Warbler

TV’s Frink said:

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

nudity is nudity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo)

you’re point? What do you think would happen if guy standing next to the statue exposed his penis?

You really don’t know how to make comparisons. If you can’t understand the difference between a woman breastfeeding and the woman next to her that takes off her shirt just to scare you, no one here can help you.

That was not the point of what I said there. I was trying show that just because we allow nude statues in an art museum, doesn’t mean we allow nude real humans.

Of all the things in this world to get bent about, … breastfeeding? Does it really have any impact whatsoever on anyone but the mother and baby?

It has an impact on mother, baby, and Warbler. That’s it.

*sigh*

*sigh*

maybe.

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

I don’t think MPAA ratings should exist at all in their current form, so…

Well they do exist.

If you’re gonna keep taking this stance of “doesn’t matter how things should be, it’s just how they are,” then I should remind you that this whole conversation was started because you think that women should breastfeed in private. And to that I have to say;

Warbler said:

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want.

Breastfeeding in public is legal in the overwhelming majority of states. If you’ve got a problem with it, feel free to try and change it, but that’s just how it is.

I believe I already agreed it is legal.

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

I don’t think MPAA ratings should exist at all in their current form, so…

Well they do exist.

dahmage said:

Warbler said:

SilverWook said:

If Julie Andrews is willing to expose them, yes? 😉

?

Her breasts I think. Or maybe nipples. Or maybe she would expose a man’s breast or nipple.

You make no sense.

SilverWook said:

If Julie Andrews is willing to expose them, yes? 😉

?

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

person X posts pic of a topless man, person y posts a pic of topless woman. Do you think Jay and mods would react to both X and Y the same?

Whether they react the same or not is not the point here.

Oh, I think it is very much the point.

person X posts pic of a topless man, person y posts a pic of topless woman. Do you think Jay and mods would react to both X and Y the same?

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

TV’s Frink said:

Why are chickens allowed to expose their breasts in restaurants? There are children in those restaurants…

*sigh*

DuracellEnergizer said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

And sometimes it’s the man who has the larger pair. Case in point:

*sigh*

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

Men and women are physically different. You know this.

Right now the breasts on a female are considered a private part and their exposure is considered nudity. If you wish to change this, feel free to try.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

At what point does a breast become indecent?

I think whenever Warb thinks of one on a woman.

I will allow the law to decide that.

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

And breastfeeding in public is lawfully allowed. Try to get it changed if you want.

Ironically, not on nude ‘sexy time party’ beaches.

What about the never-nude beaches? Why are those allowed? Should grown men really be allowed to wear cutoffs in a G-rated movie? What kind of monstrous society are we living in?

*sigh*

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

nudity is nudity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo)

you’re point? What do you think would happen if guy standing next to the statue exposed his penis?

You really don’t know how to make comparisons. If you can’t understand the difference between a woman breastfeeding and the woman next to her that takes off her shirt just to scare you, no one here can help you.

That was not the point of what I said there. I was trying show that just because we allow nude statues in an art museum, doesn’t mean we allow nude real humans.

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

And breastfeeding in public is lawfully allowed. Try to get it changed if you want.

Ironically, not on nude ‘sexy time party’ beaches.

It isn’t? Didn’t know that.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

And breastfeeding in public is lawfully allowed. Try to get it changed if you want.

true.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

nudity is nudity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo)

you’re point? What do you think would happen if guy standing next to the statue exposed his penis?

dahmage said:

Warb, unless you have something new to say, let go of the breast topic, you just keep saying the same thing over and over. This conversation has been milked dry.

When everyone else stops talking about it, so will I.

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different.

Lazy answer, is Lazy.

An answer and be both truthful and lazy.

That is the way it has been done for years.

So was women staying home to cook, clean, and handle the tots while men went out to win the bread.

Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

That’s the problem.

Well go try and get that changed. I am just using the common definition of nudity. For women, that includes the breasts.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Would you feel better if every public place had a roped off area for breastfeeding? Would that be ok then because it’s designated for that usage, even though you could still accidentally see one of those scary offensive nipples?

nude beaches aren’t just roped off. Also, they are not everywhere.

But babies are everywhere and they need to be fed.

So are rest rooms, private places, and these Udder Covers.

Anyway, what is so difficult to understand?

Adult’s mouth on breast on female = sexual

Child’s mouth on breast on female = survival

This isn’t about the age of the person whose mouth is on the breast. This isn’t about someone’s mount being on a breast, this is about female breast being exposed which constitutes nudity.

It’s about the fact that you can’t handle nudity even when it’s barely noticeable and is only being done to feed a child.

nudity is nudity.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Tell me, do you think females should be allowed to be exposed in G rated movie?

That is a ridiculous comparison.

why? men’s breasts can be shown in a G rated movie?