Warbler

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Ask yourself, WHY are they different?

It is not opinion, it is fact. Just a look at nude pic of woman and compare it to a nude pic of man. I am sure you will be able to see differences in their bodies.

Just because it’s been that way forever?

Well it has, and it is probably going to stay that way.

Tell me, do you think females should be allowed to be exposed in G rated movie?

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Would you feel better if every public place had a roped off area for breastfeeding? Would that be ok then because it’s designated for that usage, even though you could still accidentally see one of those scary offensive nipples?

nude beaches aren’t just roped off. Also, they are not everywhere.

Anyway, what is so difficult to understand?

Adult’s mouth on breast on female = sexual

Child’s mouth on breast on female = survival

This isn’t about the age of the person whose mouth is on the breast. This isn’t about someone’s mount being on a breast, this is about female breast being exposed which constitutes nudity.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

?

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

Its called nudity, we don’t allow it in public. Again the only beaches women are allowed to go topless is a nude beach.

So…you’re ok with women being topless on nude beaches but you’re not ok with women feeding their hungry babies since you might accidentally see a quarter nipple for a second…despite the fact that both things are allowed.

There are places where nudity is ok and places it is not. I think you know that.

Why are you ok with nudity being allowed on a public beach but you aren’t ok with a woman being allowed to breastfeed in public?

I am ok with nudity on beaches specifically set aside for it, but not for normal beaches. As I said, there are place where nudity is ok and places where isn’t. You know this. You know on a normal beach if woman dropped her top, she could be arrested of indecent exposure.

Is it because you can avoid the former and not the latter?

part of it, it also has to do with how the laws work. It allows nudity at a nude beach, but not a normal one.

If that’s the reason, you should probably just get over it.

I have never used those words.

chyron8472 said:

Warbler said:

chyron8472 said:

Re breastfeeding in public: You know, Udder Covers are a thing that do exist. It’s basically an apron designed to allow for privacy and modesty while breastfeeding in a public setting. That being so, I don’t see why one even need argue about it.

hadn’t heard of Udder Covers.

I hadn’t either until my daughter was due to be born.

Seems like a good idea.

CatBus said:

Warbler said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

Charlottesville is 911 for white people. It’s an inside job as part of the operation to divide this country 50/50 and set everyone at each other’s throats. Trump is a full player in this and has been carefully crafting his response to be inflammatory while appearing sympathetic to whites.

I don’t know what the end-game is for these people, but may all those with the globalist cabal burn in agony for all eternity.

here is another guy the mods need to get rid of.

Agreed. There’s a line, and race war conspiracy theories, even if so inarticulately phrased as to be almost indecipherable, are fully on one side of it.

I wish the mods would see that, or at least explain why they let the like of thejediknighthusezni and Generalfrevious remain here.

chyron8472 said:

Re breastfeeding in public: You know, Udder Covers are a thing that do exist. It’s basically an apron designed to allow for privacy and modesty while breastfeeding in a public setting. That being so, I don’t see why one even need argue about it.

hadn’t heard of Udder Covers.

thejediknighthusezni said:

Charlottesville is 911 for white people. It’s an inside job as part of the operation to divide this country 50/50 and set everyone at each other’s throats. Trump is a full player in this and has been carefully crafting his response to be inflammatory while appearing sympathetic to whites.

I don’t know what the end-game is for these people, but may all those with the globalist cabal burn in agony for all eternity.

here is another guy the mods need to get rid of.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

Its called nudity, we don’t allow it in public. Again the only beaches women are allowed to go topless is a nude beach.

So…you’re ok with women being topless on nude beaches but you’re not ok with women feeding their hungry babies since you might accidentally see a quarter nipple for a second…despite the fact that both things are allowed.

There are places where nudity is ok and places it is not. I think you know that.

And possibly showing a nipple for a half second while feeding is not OK?

possibly.

Ok.

Seriously, I don’t understand how you can tell black people what they shouldn’t be offended by and then turn around and get offended by a woman breastfeeding a child.

I don’t think offended is the right. I am not offended.

What are you then?

just someone that think nudity is reserved for certain places.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

What about when a woman feeds a baby from a bottle in public? The bottle has a nipple and you can totally see it. WHAT ABOUT THE BOTTLE NIPPLES?!?! CHILDREN CAN SEE THAT SHIT!!! WHY WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!

TV’s Frink said:

Sounds reasonable.

If you are doing that to obvious sarcasm, you are doing it wrong.

Many times you have posted that when you think I’ve said something ridiculous. I just thought I’d return the favor.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

Its called nudity, we don’t allow it in public. Again the only beaches women are allowed to go topless is a nude beach.

So…you’re ok with women being topless on nude beaches but you’re not ok with women feeding their hungry babies since you might accidentally see a quarter nipple for a second…despite the fact that both things are allowed.

There are places where nudity is ok and places it is not. I think you know that.

Ok.

Seriously, I don’t understand how you can tell black people what they shouldn’t be offended by and then turn around and get offended by a woman breastfeeding a child.

I don’t think offended is the right word. I am not offended.

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

What about when a woman feeds a baby from a bottle in public? The bottle has a nipple and you can totally see it. WHAT ABOUT THE BOTTLE NIPPLES?!?! CHILDREN CAN SEE THAT SHIT!!! WHY WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!?!

TV’s Frink said:

Sounds reasonable.

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

After the tragedy in Charlottesville I’m convinced we are in the beginnings of a second Holocaust. The GOP won’t be defeated in 2018, but even more radicalized with Trump supporters than even now. Who can stand up to Trump in the elections? The Dems are impotent and if they even get their act together they could be outlawed by an even more authoritarian government by a paranoid president. White supremacists are marching in the streets, and are going to just get stronger in the coming months. Everyone that is not them are going to die. We live in a country where one week feels like one year. By the end of four years the victims of this current are going to be either murdered or worn to complete mental exhaustion. We are reaching the point where this country chooses to be a country that only rich, white, straight, men of God only. If you don’t meet all four of these categories, the white supremacists say you can go fuck yourself. All of this is a lost cause. America is dead forever; all there is left is to scream in despair and pray that sweet death ends your suffering.

fixed

How dare you silence me like that.

President Trump is an authoritarian white supremacist. He has enboldened nazism unseen since the days of Hitler. They are shouting “JEWS WILL NOT REPLACE US” just a few days ago in the streets. One out of three Americans has pledged undying loyalty to him, and it will not be going down anytime soon. You think I am exaggerating when I say we are on the verge of a second Holocaust? Anything you would have deemed impossible only a year ago is now a near-certainty. Donald Trump will still be president in 2018. It’s possible that he could win reelection in 2020 if he can hold onto the rust belt and keep enough people disenfranchised. This is not normal. I was right all along about everything so far.

Nobody is silencing you. Dial back the drama, dude.

I wish someone would silence him. He does nothing but post crazy crap. Get rid of him.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

moviefreakedmind said:

Warbler said:

https://www.yahoo.com/beauty/powerful-group-breastfeeding-photo-declares-right-192220704.html

Ok, am I an awful person for thinking breast feeding should be done in private?

Breast feeding involves a woman exposing her breast, correct?

Is not the breast on a woman considered a private part?

What do we call beaches where women are allowed to go topless? Nude beaches, correct?

During breastfeeding the nipple is still covered. I’m not a parent yet, but I was raised in a family with a lot of kids, and breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual. It’s a common necessity of being a mother. If you don’t like it, look away.

perhaps, if the nipple is covered the whole time. And yes, I realize breastfeeding is completely natural and unsexual.

Why are you so concerned that a woman’s nipple could be shown in public during breast feeding?

Its called nudity, we don’t allow it in public. Again the only beaches women are allowed to go topless is a nude beach.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

The color of your skin matters. If everything were equal, it wouldn’t matter, but it isn’t so it doesn’t.

If the worst thing your skin color has brought you is flak when you criticize black people, consider yourself lucky.

I suppose you do have a point there. There are definitely people whom have experienced worse.

Thank you.

Or continue to cling to the white privilege that is so important to you, despite the fact that it doesn’t matter in the slightest.

I don’t cling to white privilege. You however do, to win arguments.

Sounds reasonable.

Thank you.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

dahmage said:

darthrush said:

Warbler said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

ah the answer that justifies all bigotry towards white people, including from some that are white themselves.

fixed.

Sounds about right.

I find it funny that Frink’s only response in any race argument is to devalue your opinion because of your skin color rather than address your opinion directly.

I find it funny that you are all so worried about bigotry toward white people. not that such a thing can’t or doesn’t exist, it does. but i don’t think you have shown any legit examples of it.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

That’s bigotry?

Hahahaha.

quit lecturing and policing my opinions.

As soon as you learn what bigotry is.

I know what bigotry is.

Clearly you don’t. If you did, you’d know that pointing out white privilege is not bigotry.

whatever.

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

I have the right to my opinion and I have the right to speak it.

Well then I’ll just say I think your opinion is “unreasonable” and “ridiculous.”

if you say so.

generalfrevious said:

Warbler said:

generalfrevious said:

After the tragedy in Charlottesville I’m convinced we are in the beginnings of a second Holocaust. The GOP won’t be defeated in 2018, but even more radicalized with Trump supporters than even now. Who can stand up to Trump in the elections? The Dems are impotent and if they even get their act together they could be outlawed by an even more authoritarian government by a paranoid president. White supremacists are marching in the streets, and are going to just get stronger in the coming months. Everyone that is not them are going to die. We live in a country where one week feels like one year. By the end of four years the victims of this current are going to be either murdered or worn to complete mental exhaustion. We are reaching the point where this country chooses to be a country that only rich, white, straight, men of God only. If you don’t meet all four of these categories, the white supremacists say you can go fuck yourself. All of this is a lost cause. America is dead forever; all there is left is to scream in despair and pray that sweet death ends your suffering.

fixed

How dare you silence me like that.

President Trump is an authoritarian white supremacist. He has enboldened nazism unseen since the days of Hitler. They are shouting “JEWS WILL NOT REPLACE US” just a few days ago in the streets. One out of three Americans has pledged undying loyalty to him, and it will not be going down anytime soon. You think I am exaggerating when I say we are on the verge of a second Holocaust? Anything you would have deemed impossible only a year ago is now a near-certainty. Donald Trump will still be president in 2018. It’s possible that he could win reelection in 2020 if he can hold onto the rust belt and keep enough people disenfranchised. This is not normal. I was right all along about everything so far.

fixed.

TV’s Frink said:

The color of your skin matters. If everything were equal, it wouldn’t matter, but it isn’t so it doesn’t.

If the worst thing your skin color has brought you is flak when you criticize black people, consider yourself lucky.

I suppose you do have a point there. There are definitely people whom have experienced worse.

Or continue to cling to the white privilege that is so important to you, despite the fact that it doesn’t matter in the slightest.

I don’t cling to white privilege. You however do, to win arguments.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

dahmage said:

darthrush said:

Warbler said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

ah the answer that justifies all bigotry towards white people, including from some that are white themselves.

fixed.

Sounds about right.

I find it funny that Frink’s only response in any race argument is to devalue your opinion because of your skin color rather than address your opinion directly.

I find it funny that you are all so worried about bigotry toward white people. not that such a thing can’t or doesn’t exist, it does. but i don’t think you have shown any legit examples of it.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

That’s bigotry?

Hahahaha.

quit lecturing and policing my opinions.

As soon as you learn what bigotry is.

I know what bigotry is. One doesn’t need to be black to know that.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

dahmage said:

darthrush said:

Warbler said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

ah the answer that justifies all bigotry towards white people, including from some that are white themselves.

fixed.

Sounds about right.

I find it funny that Frink’s only response in any race argument is to devalue your opinion because of your skin color rather than address your opinion directly.

I find it funny that you are all so worried about bigotry toward white people. not that such a thing can’t or doesn’t exist, it does. but i don’t think you have shown any legit examples of it.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

I am sure if tree falls and no one is around, it still makes a noise. But obviously, if no one was around, no one heard the noise.

Ah ok so it’s ok to lecture black people as long as they aren’t listening.

All I am saying that I ought to be able to give my opinion on these things without being raked through the coals just because of my skin color.

Oh hi there white privilege, nice to see you again.

That’s bigotry?

Hahahaha.

quit lecturing and policing my opinions.

devaluing my opinions because of the color of my skin is bigotry and so is your attitude.

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

DominicCobb said:

Let me get this straight.

You guys think black people can’t have an opinion on this ESPN thing.

That would be incorrect. Please do not put words in my mouth. Unlike some people, I would never say someone can’t have an opinion due to skin color. Nor would I call an opinion lecturing due to the skin color of the opinion holder. Nor would I hold a holier than thou attitude towards someone because of their skin color/gender.

I don’t know how you can pretend you’re not policing people’s opinions.

I am not policing people’s opinions, I am giving my own opinions.

There are plenty of things you’ve gotten offended by here (whether it be about religion, America, or what have you). How would you feel if you felt uncomfortable about something and then someone told you your feelings were unreasonable?

I have been told that many times. It doesn’t change this:

Warbler said:

Fact: People sometimes get offended at things that aren’t reasonable to be offended over.

Some complaints are reasonable and some aren’t. I am entitle to have an opinion on what is and is not reasonable and I am entitled to speak that opinion. I am sick and tired of my opinions being devalued due to my race.

I seem to recall a moment recently when Fanfiltration made light of your father’s death. You weren’t to happy about that were you? And he told you it was nothing to get worked up over, but it wasn’t his place to say that. They were your feelings and you had a right to your own reaction.

The thing that really upset me there was not his initial comment, it when I told him I didn’t his comment was funny, he told me to go f___ myself.

Please understand that black people have a right to their own feelings and a right to feel uncomfortable by things that might not make you feel anything.

agreed. But sometimes people feel uncomfortable about ridiculous things, things that really shouldn’t make them uncomfortable. Also some people look for things to feel uncomfortable about. I think some people claim something makes them feel uncomfortable when it actually does not. Some people have agendas.

That’s what Frink means when he talks about white priveledge. He’s not being “bigoted” against white people, he’s just saying that maybe, just maybe, it’s possible that people of other races might be offended by things that don’t make you feel anything,

I agree, it is possible. But just because something doesn’t make me feel uncomfortable doesn’t mean I can’t see how it is reasonable that something would make a black person feel uncomfortable. In this case, I am just not seeing it. I think I have the right to say that I am not seeing. I think should be able to give my opinions on these without getting an attitude from Frink and told I am lecturing black people or policing black people’s opinions all because of the color of my skin.

and it’s not really your place to call their feelings unreasonable.

I have the right to my opinion and I have the right to speak it.

generalfrevious said:

After the tragedy in Charlottesville I’m convinced we are in the beginnings of a second Holocaust. The GOP won’t be defeated in 2018, but even more radicalized with Trump supporters than even now. Who can stand up to Trump in the elections? The Dems are impotent and if they even get their act together they could be outlawed by an even more authoritarian government by a paranoid president. White supremacists are marching in the streets, and are going to just get stronger in the coming months. Everyone that is not them are going to die. We live in a country where one week feels like one year. By the end of four years the victims of this current are going to be either murdered or worn to complete mental exhaustion. We are reaching the point where this country chooses to be a country that only rich, white, straight, men of God only. If you don’t meet all four of these categories, the white supremacists say you can go fuck yourself. All of this is a lost cause. America is dead forever; all there is left is to scream in despair and pray that sweet death ends your suffering.

fixed