Warbler

They have to impeach this bastard now! Before he starts WWIII.

agreed, but admin or owner would prevent confusion to new forum members.

maybe makes Jay’s owner or administrator.

Which do you think is worse?

This:

or

This:

oojason said:

Maybe something like this in the signature space for the time being?
 

 

Hopefully should look ok in there?

It will do. But you did not need to delete your line about justice for the Hillsborough victims.

You should be able to add an image to your sig like you do a regular post.

Mark’s Down On Your Syntax said:

Glad Warbler’s come back.

Sougouk said:

Welcome back Warbler!

Thanks guys. 😃

TV’s Frink said:

http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/354205-former-apprentice-producer-trumps-behind-the-scenes-comments-were-very-much

The missing word in that link text is “racist.”

why am I not surprised?

TM2YC said:

A former(?) forum-member proudly claimed in this very thread that he shed a tear of joy at his little daughter’s gun use and collection of weapons. Some of us were horrified no doubt but I think it’d be fair to say ALL of us would be horrified if he’d proudly declared that his young kid was already a full-blown alcoholic after he’d started her on Absinthe at an early age (we’d probably hope he was arrested). Why is a relatively (I want to emphasise that word) harmless thing like alcohol treated as worse in the eyes of the law than weapons designed specifically for the mass slaughter of human beings?

I think the forum member you refer to is Ferris. He is still a forum member here(he hasn’t been banned or anything), he has hasn’t posted for a while. Yes, his daughter is allowed to use guns. But to be fair, I think he made clear that she was only allowed to use guns while he was there(or perhaps the mother or other responsible adult) using reasonable gun safety, which I think he takes seriously. I think he made clear the girl was not allowed unsupervised access to guns.

Could someone tell me what is so funny about a female sports reporter talking about routes?

Moderators should be clearly marked as such to avoid confusion. This would be good for new forum members so it would be clear to them who is and who is not a moderator. It could also be useful for everyone when new moderators are added.

Ban bump stocks and anything else that can turn a semi-auto rifle into a full auto rifle. Totally ban full auto rifles. Ban all semi auto rifles that are too easy to convert to full auto.

One thing I will say that that we need to be more sensible with these bans. From what I’ve learned, the last time “assault rifles” were banned, we ended up banning rifles on look rather than on function. Lets not make that mistake this time. Lets make sure we understand what we are talking about when we past gun control laws.

dahmage said:

welcome back Warbler!

Thankyou

one69chev said:

Hey brother welcome back.

Thanks!

Jeebus said:

And welcome back, Warb 😃

Thankyou.

SilverWook said:

Apparently this is a real product.
https://youtu.be/i9qv8RSreIM

There is no way I would display that bear with the American flag.

darthrush said:

Welcome back Warb! Good to have ya back again

RayRogers said:

Welcome back Warbler! Person I barely know.

Bingowings said:

Welcome back Mr Bler

Handman said:

Welcome back! You might not know me well here, but I certainly missed reading your posts.

Thanks guys.

chyron8472 said:

I didn’t know Heinz made that.

oojason said:

Good folk - please lay off using words like ‘dick’ when criticising or critiquing fellow members.

What about when referring to Trump or the nut in N. Korea?

Thanks, it is nice to be back.

Tyrphanax said:

Warbler said:

ironically, when discussing gun control in the past, I brought my concern about bump stocks. Unfortunately, my concern was justified. I would be curious what Ferris would say.

You were actually the first person I thought of when I saw this video, because I remember you asking me what I thought of bump fire stocks.

The gun community consensus is that a “Gat Crank” was used here (basically a little crank handle you attach to your trigger guard and crank like “ye olde gatlinge gune” in order to actuate the trigger faster than your finger likely could [but not as fast or as smoothly as an actual automatic weapon]), but the basic objective remains the same: simulate automatic fire with a semi-automatic weapon for fun at the range.

It annoyed me because A. I knew this was going to happen, and B. I hate things like that because the gun rights issue is contentious enough without people deliberately going in and stretching the rules and trying to see what they can get away with in a legal grey area, because then we end up in this kind of situation where something has to give and a lot of the time what gives are our rights.

Hopefully we see a nice ATF ban on Gat Cranks and Bump Fire Stocks and that’s the end of it. Good riddance.

Welcome back, btw.

JEDIT: Just looked at the pictures of the guns and it actually looks like a bump fire stock rather than a Gat Crank. Whoops.

I agree both Gat Cranks and bump fire stocks should be banned.

Tyrphanax said:

Welcome back, btw.

Thanks!

I don’t think I have ever seen him insulting beyond belief, but I have seen him be entirely unreasonable 😉

Thanks, ChainsawAsh.

SilverWook said:

Well, if you find such a post, link me to it so I can look at the code. 😃

I got no idea where to look. I don’t know a date or a thread. 😦