logo Sign In

Tiptup

User Group
Members
Join date
4-May-2006
Last activity
26-Apr-2012
Posts
1,696

Post History

Post
#223041
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
Originally posted by: jack Spencer Jr
there were literally hundreds of Star Wars wanna be's in the last thirty years, and only a handful even come close. The main reason was that many of the other movies had piss poor stories and relied on the special effects to hold the audience interest. And it did for an opening weekend and then tapered off and then no one bothered to think of them much after that. With this approach, Lucas has made Star Wars into the worst knock off of Star Wars. This boggles the mind.


Heh, that's very true. The worst tragedy of the prequels is how they unintentionally turn the Star Wars universe into a caricature of itself! I suppose can't get angry at Lucas (well, beyond his arrogance anyways). I suppose he's doing the best he can, but what a freakin' let down.

That reminds me: how many times during the 90's did we here about how such-and-such movie was "the Star Wars for the next generation" in their stupid ads?! The OT is the Star Wars for the next generation. Hopefully Lucas will reaize that as well and give its fans access to every version of the great films and not just his latest edits.

Otherwise, about the PT story, the more I think about it, the more I believe that it shouldn't have been about Anakin or the actual Clone Wars at all. At the most it should have had Obiwan at a young age and the Palpatine's rise to a place of power (with foreshadowings), but otherwise with completely different characters and none of this the-saga-is-about-Darth-Vader plot nonsense. Darth Vader is one of the greatest villains ever and should not have had his mystique ruined.
Post
#222041
Topic
Ages of Luke & Leia
Time
Originally posted by: Yoda Is Your Father
Originally posted by: trickbaxter
Leia remembering her mom/the ending of ROTS has never bothered me
Me neither, because I ignore everything in the prequels.


Amen to that.

The real Lea was with her mother at a young age (not just at birth) and she remembers her mother as sad because her mother's husband became evil. Enough said.
Post
#221709
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
Originally posted by: CO
SW '77 was in some ways the same way. It had the typical Wizard, Princess, Farmboy, Bad Guy with a mask, and Smartass Rogue character, all stereotypes, that weren't totally explored because of the standalone movie. Both movies work to perfection because they are basic in their fundamentals of movie making and don't try to be anything else. The simpleness of Star Wars is what I love, it doesn't try to show Vader conflicted, it doesn't show too much of each character that would have overidden the basic good vs evil story.


I have to disagree somewhat. Star Wars was of course light in the way it focused on the action and suspense primarily, but there was so much dark past to the world and its characters that everything felt much more real than a set of stereotypes would have allowed on their own. Darth Vader's and Obiwan's conflict and bloody history from old wars . . . Luke's father being killed by Darth Vader . . . Han Solo's smuggling problems and shady history . . . the politics of the empire, the old republic, and the rebellion . . . there was so much that was specifically important on the actual screen to give the film's story a nicely interwoven plot.
Post
#221699
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
Han dying would have been very hard to pull off in a good way. Based upon what Kurtz describes there, his death sounds random and the character deserved better than that. I know very little about what execution they wanted for that plot point though, so I guess we may never know what would have been better.

I think I agree with Kurtz that Raiders of the Lost Ark was very light on the pregnant story elements. It was a much more straightforward film and not much actually happened on the screen that truly spoke of deeper things. Sure, you had characters with "pasts," but those pasts were never explored in detail. In other words, Raiders had many possibilities for subtext, but practically no real subtext was ever explored or specifically mentioned. Still, the dialogue and acting in Raiders were great, causing all of us to love the characters, and the action was very fun to watch. It deserved to make the money it did, but I can easilly see a shallow guy like Lucas arguing that it proves that people want mindless, feel-good action and nothing else.
Post
#221609
Topic
PT Bashing? What brought it back?
Time
Originally posted by: DorK313
For a time things were calming down about the PT. We all agreed, for the most part, about the problems it had and it seemed the conversation had started to become old news. Then suddenly threads started popping up again with all sorts of new posts pretty much covering what has already been said. Once again, I'm no fan of the PT either, I was just curious as to why we decided to pick up our clubs and beat at it some more. It's not a pinata, we aren't going to find candy inside you know but then again I can see the sence of satisfaction to be able to look at it lying on the ground dead.


Hmm, true. I wouldn't want to be critcizing the the PT out of malice or pride. But, i do believe it is useful and interesting to give meaningful discussion to the prequel trilogy's flaws. At the very least, it gets my mind thinking about proper aesthetics.
Post
#221607
Topic
Why the PT fans love the PT so much, not as diehard as we think
Time
I respect everyone's opion here, but for me, personally, I see little to no redeemable value for AotC or RotS as basic movies. In other words, they are only liked by people to any degree because they are in the Star Wars universe. If they weren't, they would have failed at the box office. Even TPM would have had a tough time making a profit in my mind, despite being the only movie of the PT that can stand as a movie on its own.


Originally posted by: Nanner Split
I just look at 1-3 as just more Star Wars fan films, sort of like the ones on Youtube, except with a bigger budget.


That's probably the healthiest way to regard the PT.
Post
#221605
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
Originally posted by: jack Spencer Jr
Lucas took the easy way out with the prequels. He basically made up a list of events that he figured people wanted to see: (when Obi-wan met Anakin, when Anakin met Luke's mom, when Anakin turned to the dark side, when Luke and Leia were born, etc) and made a vulgar checklist so that he could give people what they wanted, or he thought they wanted, and then just filled in the blanks. However, this made the prequels function piss-poorly as the first three installments of a six-part series.

That's most likely an exact description of George Lucas' motivation for creating the stupid plot points we all payed to sit through.


Originally posted by: jack Spencer Jr
They should never have shown Anakin becoming Darth Vader. Vader's identity should have been hidden somehow. In fact, it should have looked like what Obi Wan said in ANH, that Darth Vader was a pupil of Obi Wan's who turned evil and betrayed and murdered Anakin. Now how to do that when they are both the same person is difficult, but not impossible.

Yeah, that would be hard but not too hard. For a quick and messy example: Give Obiwan multiple pupils and have a number of them disappear along with Obiwan at some point, then have Obiwan return just as some masked villain appears, calling himself Darth Vader, hunting down the Jedi in some fashion. Then you have Obiwan state that he knows who the evil man behind the mask is, but never actually openly declare his identity onscreen.


Originally posted by: CO
Lukes rescue in Jabba's palace, I still dont know what the plan was? Leia saves Han as Jabba and his boys sit behind a curtain, why would they let her get Han out and then reveal themselves? Yoda telling Luke the only way he can become a jedi is by confronting Vader, yet thats the reason he wouldn't let him leave in ESB? Vader wanted to take out The Emperor in ESB, but now is loyal to him when he first meets Luke? Leia says after Luke tells her he is her brother, "Somehow I always knew." You did Leia, then why did you kiss him in ESB? And then ObiWan, "From a point of view" That was a cop out, and could have been written so much better, like it is ObiWan who is feeling so much guilt for everything that happened that Luke is the only hope.


Heh, yeah, the “plan” at Jabba's Palace always made me scratch my head, even at a very young age. Jabba's trap for Lea also seemed a tad implausible and silly. And yeah, the "certain point of view" line by Obiwan was somewhat lame (though fun to quote with my friend). Obiwan could have admitted that he wanted to manipulate Luke and still have been cool.

Otherwise, Yoda didn't want Luke to leave in ESB because Luke was too inexperienced with the force. The "failure at the cave" was Luke using the force to attack Darth Vader and destroy him. Since the force is never meant for attacking, Luke was being seduced by the dark side at that point and becoming that same as his enemy. That made Yoda greatly worry if Luke was ready or not. When Yoda sent Luke off in RotJ he told him to "confront" Vader, not necessarily kill him, and certainly not using the force to accomplish the actual attack, which would have been of the dark side.

And as for Lea kissing Luke in ESB, that is really awkward when you think of them as brother/sister, but you could say Lea was acting wildly because Han's advances made her very uncomfortable. Still, the brother/sister revelation was always far-fetched. A high degree of credulity on my part was never needed for the second Death Star compared with that revelation. Lucas should have devised a more meaningful way for the Luke/Lea relationship to grow in RotJ and that would have given Han more ways to be explored as a character. But, even then, it was very moving to have them as brother and sister, so I can forgive the choice (and pretend that the force fated them to be reunited).

Lastly, the "rule the galaxy as father and son" statement from Vader was hard to believe even within ESB. First, the level of devotion Vader displayed to the Emperor was too high for us to take his statement seriously. Plus, what about all of the work Vader went through to capture Luke in a way that he could bring him before the Emperor unharmed? Thirdly, who's to say that Vader truly wished he could have taken on the emperor but that in practicality his enslavement was too great? There are many ways that vader could have been lying to Luke to some degree, and bad guys do tell lies. Fourthly, perhaps Vader's ambition had no available options to use Luke in RotJ.


Originally posted by: CO
I always ask the PT gushers the big question, why didn't Anakin question Palpatine about how this trick of saving people once? Why doesn't he atleast explore if this is true before going off and killing a bunch of jedi kids and choking his wife. He doesn't ask once, "So how do you do this, because I am about to turn on every Jedi I have been friends with since 10 years old." That to me is just plain stupid, and makes the greatest villain Darth Vader, look like a complete moron.


Anakin behaved so irrationally in every encounter with Palpatine in RotS. Once you got to that scene where Anakin simply bows before his new master without asking any questions or showing any real inner conflict or remorse, the movie is completely laughable. Sure, maybe we could argue that Anakin had completely lost to the dark side the very instant he cut off Saruman's head, but if that's the case, then the dark side works in an irrational and pathetic way. It's far easier to believe that the PT Anakin was an evil asshole that didn't mind killing kids.

In Empire, Darth Vader had a line that didn't make it into the movie where he tried to get Anakin to destroy him using the dark side of the force. Then, in RotJ, we see that if Luke kills Vader using the dark side (which was probably his only realistic option before the Emperor) he would most definitely become enslaved by evil. I always believed the primary reason for this was because Luke would have killed his father in destroying Vader and that would have devastated him on a personal level. Coming from that thought, I always believed that Anakin had become enslaved by the dark side in a similar way. Some dark tragedy committed by his own hands that he could never forgive himself for. The PT kind of went that way with Padme’s cause of death, but not really since Anakin had to have been completely enslaved by evil by the time he strangled her and thus no tragedy was needed to make his mind prisoner to the dark side and to the emperor.


Edit: An Example of a good tragedy for Anakin would have been his own reckless use of the dark side in his pursuit of power result in the death of his mother. For instance, he could have tried destroying some ship or something that his mother was on in order to defeat his enemies and gain control of the galaxy. Then, when he learned that he had killed his own mother in the process, that could have given the Emperor a high-enough level of grief to exploit and enslave Anakin's will.
Post
#221446
Topic
Yoda slices first.
Time
Originally posted by: Skyranger
I just noted on ROTS that when Commander (Captain, Colonel, or whatever) Cody gets the message from the Emperor to execute "General Order 66", and somehow telepathically communicates this to the other Cody, that Yoda slices them in half. Yoda didn't even give them the chance to fire at point blank range and miss.... I guess Yoda is just cold hearted, unlike the warm hearted Han Solo.


Good point.
Post
#221444
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
The hunting down of the Jedi was sadly one-dimensional and not a gradual, epic process like I thought it would have been. The transformation to the twisted forms for Vader and the Emperor were also simplistically instantaneous. I always thought Vader lost more and more pieces of himself as he hunted down more and more of the Jedi. Hmm. :\

Originally posted by: CO
There was really no way Lucas could have done this trilogy well without spoiling something, it is just too hard, and too much stuff would left out that ties it up. But that is the whole point why it should be watched 4-6, 1-3, the PT is a simple backstory, and if it were better, it would work great with the OT.

I agree, but that assumes there was actually something worth seeing in the prequel trilogy. Now I simply wish George had never tried tying anything together. He should have made a more distant story. Then again, I should say that a master writer could have still dealt with the same characters and themes while keeping the juicy, latter revelations unmolested.


Originally posted by: CO
But by Lucas giving all these petty tie ins of Jango Fett, Anakin making C-3PO, and Yoda having good relations with the wookies, it only cheapened the OT, cause it looked like he was running out of ideas. Lucas was probably like, "Well I don't know who originally owned C-3PO, let me have Anakin build him!" "I have to get this wookie planet in one of the movies, let me have Yoda go there." These things bring zero depth to the saga, and make it just plain stupid.


Exactly. So much of the supposed "back story" isn't back story at all. Its cheap and unimaginative crap flung at OT story facets. Almost everything compelling about the PT’s story relies completely upon the way those very same elements were important in the OT. Unfortunately, nine times out of ten, what we see in the PT hurts everything more than it enhances.

Darth Vader is given the worst treatment in the PT. I always envisioned Darth Vader as having a dark and twisted tragedy enslaving him to the dark side. Instead, his turn to the dark side of the force is all about being a whiny, bitchy complainer! I hate Anakin from the PT! Sure, he wasn't as annoying in RotS as he was in AotC but he was still a completely irrational asshole. I cannot envision him as ever becoming Darth Vader or else I even come to hate the Darth Vader in the OT as some pathetic loser and that breaks my heart. It's actually sad. I can only enjoy the OT if I force everything from the PT out of my mind.


Originally posted by: CO
Stuff like the rise of Palpatine as a politican to Emperor, that is interesting! I never pictuerd The Emperor that way, and now that he rose to power, instead of just seizing power gives depth to the OT now for ROTJ. Take away Jango Fett and that stupid tiein, but the Clone Troopers being on the republics side, and Kenobi flying to Kamino to see them make the clones, gives an added depth to the OT. I now think at the end of ANH, that Vader goes right to Kamino to see how many clones he is going to need to rebuild the Empire, before he gets yelled at by The Emperor after the Death Star is blown up.


Hmm, I had always envisioned the emperor as having risen to power legitimately before seizing his ultimate power. Of course I knew there were other possibilities, but that path always seemed the most likely to me. In ANH we have the Death Star council discussing the removal of a senate as the last remnant of the "old republic" and that always conjured notions in my mind of the emperor using the force for evil political gains and then slowly destroyed the system that gave him his power.

Otherwise, I thought the “clones” as a story element were handled very badly. I didn't care about any of them at all, and it makes the Storm Troopers of the OT seem incredibly lame. I just go back to pretending they were elite combat troops as they were originally intended to be before George wrote the PT.

Also, the "Clone Wars" themselves actually made no sense in the PT and aren't consistent with how Luke and Obiwan discussed them. They weren't a series of "wars" since they were just one war and nobody lost anything important on either side except money. It was fought purely by totally-expendable droids and totally-expendable clones. How boring is that? No normal people like you or me could have ever gotten "involved" in such a ridiculous video game war. Based upon what George Lucas showed us, I don't see how, when, or why Luke's uncle could have ever told Anakin to have "not gotten involved" unless we assume Obiwan was lying to Luke about that too. What a freakin’ disappointment.

[/rant]
Post
#221319
Topic
Why the PT fans love the PT so much, not as diehard as we think
Time
Originally posted by: Invader Jenny
And what was the actual balance anyway? The Jedi in the movie believed it to be a numarical thing. All the jedi/0 Sith means balance to them. Okay, whatever.


I never understood that much either. I aways assumed it meant that Vader killed all the Jedi and then killed off the Sith. Then everything could begin fresh with Luke and Lea?
Post
#221315
Topic
ESB Scene Using Kenner Toys!
Time
That was a lot of fun to watch. The impersonations and odd music fit perfectly.

Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
I'm getting a bit self-indulgent here, but that was a lot of fun to watch. I kinda wish they'd kept the original movie audio in there. That would have been even better. The midi versions of the score reminded me of Donkey Kong Country 2 for some reason.


DKC2 had great music. I absolutely love the music written for those games . . . ahhh, the SNES era; how I miss you. . . .
Post
#221182
Topic
Why the PT fans love the PT so much, not as diehard as we think
Time
Originally posted by: Darth-Adroit
This is now a world where one is rewarded for doing nothing, where no one takes responsibility and everyone has an excuse. No wonder they relate to Anakin; they are Anakin. Everyone owes them something for gracing the Earth with their presence. No one should give them a hard time about being an alcoholic because alcoholism is a disease and daddy never loved them. What changed in the last 20, 50, 100 or even 1000 years? Alcoholism has always been a disease and many people have been shafted with less than stellar parents. What changed is that we as a society now accept and in some instances encourage mediocrity. Why do your best when everyone from the star goalie to the bench-warmer gets a ribbon? Why should you step up and accept responsibility for killing children when you can blame it on chemicals and daddy’s mental abuse?


I hope I don't make a post like that until I'm at least 60.

I basically agree with all of your points though. While I don't see modern society falling apart compared to the past, I do see the shift of values in the dominant culture. The PT seems to reflect these shallow and selfish values well. In addition, nobody can identify with Anakin in RotS unless they are completely irrational and missing half a brain. So many nonsensical plot points:

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=episode3
Post
#221177
Topic
Watched ROTS on HBO, UGGGH!
Time
Originally posted by: JediFlyer06
Vader NEVER should have been shown, or even referred to by name in ROTS. He only ever should have been seen physically as Anakin Skywalker, and referred to as Anakin Skywalker. Vader should be seen for the first time in ANH, and not fully revealed as Anakin until ROTJ. That would maintain the mystery, the drama, and the surprises of the OT when the movies are watched chronologically. The last we should see of Anakin as an audience is when Kenobi supposedly kills him. As an audience, you think he's dead. Then, in the OT you're shocked to learn that he survived and has become Darth Vader. That's good storytelling, something Lucas has made every effort to avoid.


Ah crap, I just made a thread about this. Oh well.
Post
#221170
Topic
George ruined the drama in his own stories.
Time
I just had a thought the other day that isn't very complicated or original. I'm almost sure it was a worry to quite a few Star Wars fans before the prequel trilogy was ever even released. It certainly was to me, but, strangely enough, the thought hasn't consciously troubled my mind for quite a few years until just a few days ago. Basically it was an old worry of mine that any prequel trilogy would ruin the most important dramatic moments in the original trilogy for anybody who might be newly exposed to the series. I knew I would have hated to see the father/son revelation between Luke and Vader ruined by matter-of-fact story elements in a prequel. Yet, I always had faith that Lucas knew what he was doing and that his masterful artistic vision would heighten the experience far beyond anything that might have been lost. Essentially I believed that the lessening of important plot points in the original trilogy would, in the end, be worth experiencing the rich history behind the first Star Wars movies. Boy was I ever wrong.

My question for George Lucas and his supporters:

What is the point of making a prequel trilogy for Star Wars that so heavily relies upon the best dramatic revelations and other story elements from the original trilogy? If, as George Lucas says, the Star Wars “saga” is now intended to be watched in numerical order, does that then mean that the plot revelations in Empire and Jedi were never meant to be anything special beyond our sympathy for the immediate characters?

He should have made the prequels as I always thought he should have years ago. Leave them mute regarding the most dramatic revelations in the original trilogy, and have a new plot in the prequel trilogy that is unpredictable for those exposed to the original trilogy. Then, no matter which trilogy you began with, you would have new perspectives added and new dramatic moments enjoyed.

As it is, George Lucas ruined every plot revelation in one trilogy if you have watched the other first. And, since the original trilogy is easily the greater artistic achievement, the greater crime is committed against them. How could George not have seen what he was doing? I've lost all respect for him. He has proven to me that he cares nothing for the Star Wars universe beyond making money and satisfying his petty megalomania.
Post
#221169
Topic
The last time you saw one of the Star Wars films
Time
Originally posted by: Darth_Evil
Heh, Same Here. It's the complete oposite of my affection for the OT. The first time I watched TPM, AOTC and ROTS, I thought they were pretty cool. Each subsequent time I watched them, they were worse and worse for me, especially ROTS, which I thought was good in my initial viewing of it. I was taken in by the special effects and amazing lightsaber duels in each film, not noticing the horrible dialouge and numerous plot holes they created. Now, I can't even stand to watch PM. AOTC is ok, but now I can't stand most of ROTS. (In fact, AOTC is probably the one in the PT I can find the most enjoyment in.)


I know exactly what you and Gaffer mean. I actually thought RotS was the best of the prequels the first time I saw it. Now I think its probably the worst when judged as an everyday movie. There is so much useless crap in that movie to sift through. What the hell was the plot? At least you could claim that Attack of the Clones tried to be a mystery/love-story despite totally failing with both. Though to the credit of Revenge of the Sith, it does actualy have some amazing sequences and by far the most moving dramatic moment in the PT at its end.
Post
#219532
Topic
Moving in from the Basher's Sanctuary (TF.n)
Time
Haha, 13-year-old, snott-nosed moderators are so cool. TF.N is a site I would definitely never post on. There are too many people and that's far too confusing. Plus, I like relaxed moderation. If people say what they want when they want it filters out the weak. Over-moderation simply keeps out anything that might be disturbing.

Anyways, that statment of yours made a lot of good points, Zombie, but you should learn to make your points more concise in future. They would be more powerfully communicated that way.