logo Sign In

Tiptup

User Group
Members
Join date
4-May-2006
Last activity
26-Apr-2012
Posts
1,696

Post History

Post
#267988
Topic
The end of Star Wars?
Time
You seem like a good poster, UncleOwen. I’m sure you’re very welcome here.


Originally posted by: Fang Zei
He saw ROTS about a week or so after I did and his first comments to me were "Oh my God, Oh my God, it actually felt like Star Wars!" Several months later he'd refer to that comment as a false alarm and say he'd had more fun watching "The Aviator."

I know exactly what your friend went through. The first time I saw RotS, I thought that it was great and thought that it might have saved the PT. I desperately wanted to have the PT to be good and to have a decent Star Wars “saga.” But, upon reflection, when the newness wore off, its flaws began standing out to me. Then, when I heard that those damn 2004 DVDs were all that we were going to ever have of the original films (which are the true films), I decided to reject the whole damn thing. To me Star Wars is bigger than George Lucas’ revisionism.


Originally posted by: vote_for_palpatine
What happened to the Star Wars name is what happens so very often in life: Potential becomes reality and so very much is lost in the process. Lucas and company had a huge slab of stone to work with and made two masterpieces with it. But George chipped away a little too much over time.


Heh, a good friend of mine compared the SEs and the PT to George over mixing chocolate/vanilla swirl ice cream until the swirl is gone. Though I don’t believe that George Lucas simply diminished the saga, the worst part was how he added crap that totally conflicted with what had come before. Stuff that nobody was asking for or could have ever wanted.


Originally posted by: vote_for_palpatine
But because Lucas chose to go down this road, there's no easy way to have a discussion about the material. You have to identify which camp you're in and by the time you've spent energy and time defending your stance, you don't really feel like discussing the content very much.


Uhg, I know what you’re talking about there. My friends and I once loved to quote and talk about Star Wars endlessly. Now we avoid the topic because it simply reminds us of everything George Lucas has done.
Post
#267835
Topic
Video Games - a general discussion thread
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Final Fantasy X is a good game. It redesigns a LOT about the Final Fantasy system--no over-world, and the battle system now takes place based on turn progression instead of whoever gets their little meter charged up first. There's a lot of strategery to it, and the game isn't as ridiculously unbalanced as the older games.


Hmm? The old games weren't unbalanced. Well, maybe FF7 and FF8 were (despite being fun anyways), but the rest were pretty kick-ass, classic games.
Post
#267830
Topic
The end of Star Wars?
Time
I was never truly obsessed with the details of Star Wars. When it came to some of the glaring questions, I would simply have fun thinking about it all myself and get answers from the films only. I saw no need to discuss anything endlessly or consult bad EU. The films were my canon and I needed nothing else (beyond some basics).

But, I can still totally understand your point of view, Zombie. I agree that Star Wars is getting old again. What makes everything sad this time is how it will have the venom of the PT and the SEs to help twist everything good from the series into meaninglessness. (And the TV series will be frightening if the PT was any indication. Hello new revisions. Hello new contradictions. Hello cheese. Hello boring repetition.)

I intend to divorce myself from it all and return to where I was before 1997 and focus only on the first three movies again. The only reason I'm even chatting at a Star Wars site was because of the supposed OOT release on DVD (which I didn't even purchase due to its substandard qualities). If we can get an actually good release then I might come back for awhile. Otherwise, I’m guessing that George doesn’t want my interest or money.
Post
#267579
Topic
Horriffic Violence Theater
Time
Hah, I liked it. I gave it a rating of 3 stars.


When i think back about my violent drawings and comics, I had many. (I still draw violent things from time to time.) One of the more memorable episodes involved a number of images depicting Minnie Mouse being tortured, dismembered, and generally killed. (If you ever played "Mickey Mousecapades" for the NES then you'll know why.) I actually remember my father sitting me down and telling me that violence against women is wrong after he saw them. It was funny.
Post
#267489
Topic
General Harry Potter Discussion
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Hmm, I looked into the whole Bilbo and dragon thing a little more. Actually that whole sequence is very similar to parts of Beowulf. Tolkien borrowed plenty of things from plenty of different myths and legends. I think he would actually be proud that new writers and borrowing from the legend he wrote.


I agree with you that Tolkien's world is beyond Rowling's, but what scene in the first Harry Potter book mimics Bilbo riddling with Smaug? I can't think of one.
Post
#267216
Topic
General Harry Potter Discussion
Time
Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
In all fainess i think J.K. Rowling is a hack i mean I read some of the first book and the writing was fairly juvenile and derivative and ripped off of tolkien very badly in some obvious places. I think it's funny because I saw an interview with her on t.v. where she does even try to disguise that she ripped off tolkien heck she said she read those when she was a kid. the fact that she intirely plagiarised one of my favorite moments in the hobbit the one between bilbo and smaug the dragon in the first potter book told me this book belonged thrown in the trash.

What?

I'm a huge fan of the Hobbit and of the Harry Potter series and I have no idea what you're talking about.

As for Rowling's skills as a writer, she's a very good communicator, her world is logically coherent, and best of all she has a good sense of humor. Just what were you wanting exactly?


Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
I do like how It incorreges listeracy in the young people of the world though especially children even though I find it to be lacking in most points as a piece of fiction. It incorreges young peope to dream and teaches them values myths etc yada, yada yada.


Good Lord. Are you even being serious, skyjedi?
Post
#266797
Topic
Superman 2 The Donner Cut
Time
The Donner cut should involve Clark, Louis, and Jimmy getting lost in a mountain blizzard and subsequently eating each other's flesh to survive.

Anyways, about going back in time, that never made sense to me in the least, but, I don't think these were meant to be serious movies. Maybe they were, but something gives me the feeling that they weren't.