Originally posted by: Fang ZeiHe saw ROTS about a week or so after I did and his first comments to me were "Oh my God, Oh my God, it actually felt like Star Wars!" Several months later he'd refer to that comment as a false alarm and say he'd had more fun watching "The Aviator."
I know exactly what your friend went through. The first time I saw RotS, I thought that it was great and thought that it might have saved the PT. I desperately wanted to have the PT to be good and to have a decent Star Wars “saga.” But, upon reflection, when the newness wore off, its flaws began standing out to me. Then, when I heard that those damn 2004 DVDs were all that we were going to ever have of the original films (which are the true films), I decided to reject the whole damn thing. To me Star Wars is bigger than George Lucas’ revisionism.
Originally posted by: vote_for_palpatine
What happened to the Star Wars name is what happens so very often in life: Potential becomes reality and so very much is lost in the process. Lucas and company had a huge slab of stone to work with and made two masterpieces with it. But George chipped away a little too much over time.
Heh, a good friend of mine compared the SEs and the PT to George over mixing chocolate/vanilla swirl ice cream until the swirl is gone. Though I don’t believe that George Lucas simply diminished the saga, the worst part was how he added crap that totally conflicted with what had come before. Stuff that nobody was asking for or could have ever wanted.
Originally posted by: vote_for_palpatineBut because Lucas chose to go down this road, there's no easy way to have a discussion about the material. You have to identify which camp you're in and by the time you've spent energy and time defending your stance, you don't really feel like discussing the content very much.