Originally posted by: SammyTheBull
The fact that only Lucas has so far saved the world from Indiana Jones IV is another reason why he should be praised. There is nothing worse in the film world than remakes, but the second place in the hierarchy of idiocy is occupied by belated, unwanted sequels that no logic accepts (especially when you have a self-standing trilogy that opens and closes itself perfectly), that only a couple of "fans" actually demand, and that only gets considered because it's easy money. There are about four exceptions where a sequel was actually good enough to be comparable to the original,
there are exactly three cases where the sequel was better (Godfather II, Bride of Frankenstein, Star Trek II), and there are a few cases where a sequel is so different that it makes an excellent film on its own (Return to Oz), but 99,99% of the cases are cash-in trash. The Indy IV crowd probably consists of the same ones that are now wondering "duh, me want know when Peter Jackson shoot Lord of the Rings IV, duuh". (Of course, half of Hollywood executives ejaculate over that very same idea, too)
I would agree with you regarding sequels, were it not for the fact that I think Indiana Jones IV really is coming from a genuine place with good intentions. Spielberg, Lucas and Ford have all said that the Indiana Jones films were the most fun they've had in their careers, and I don't think anyone should fault them for wanting to do one more. Were it all about money, it would have been produced by now.
Indiana Jones fans on the whole are a pretty intelligent bunch, and for the most part are very far from the image that you have put forth. A lot of them really care about the series, and are very protective of it. They want to see a fourth film done right, in the spirit of the other 3. Most of them don't care how long it takes, as long as it's good. I think Spielberg, Lucas and Ford share this ideal.