logo Sign In

TheCassidy

User Group
Members
Join date
16-May-2005
Last activity
22-Sep-2011
Posts
1,111

Post History

Post
#270795
Topic
Info & Help: Looking for... Raiders Of The Lost Ark - on HDTV
Time
Originally posted by: cashflagg
Originally posted by: TheCassidy
the only difference between the HD broadcast and the commercially available DVD was the TV edited dialogue track with no swearing.


What swearing? I think Indy says 'shit' once in DOOM.


I thought we were talking 'Raiders.' But if you want specifics, here goes.

'Raiders' - Goddamned, Son Of A Bitch, Holy Shit
'TOD' - Bastards, Shit
'Last Crusade' - Jesus Christ

I've watched 'em a couple of times.
Post
#270776
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: sean wookie
I put in a application at Burlington Coat Factory. Which if you don't know they sell clothes and stuff there.


Jesus Christ, who would've guessed?


You know on the internets how people write things like "LOL" as an overused figure of speech?

Well, SD, that literally made me chuckle - there may have even been a tear...a tear of humor.
Post
#270775
Topic
Star wars Refferance in Lost
Time
Originally posted by: Johnny Ringo
It's obvious that the creators are star wars fans and like to slip in references. It's odd IMO tho that they give these lines to Sawyer, Essentially making him the star wars fan, He just doesn't strike me as that kind of guy. I guess tho that star wars is so widespread that just about everyone gets the quotes. btw, the 'red shirt' reference was way before JJ became involved with star trek...A sign of things to come?

Re:23 - that there is lost referencing lost.


I find it totally fitting for Sawyer to get the Star Wars reference lines. He's the least likely character to say things like that, because there is a perception that he is an ignorant hillbilly, when in fact, he's quite well read, articulate and pretty pop-culture saavy.

Post
#270622
Topic
Info & Help: Looking for... Raiders Of The Lost Ark - on HDTV
Time
Originally posted by: digitalfreaknyc
And there was no isolated tracks on the dvd's purhaps someone could create one from the expanded cd release and LP for at least raiders. I know film score monthly released a expanded temple of doom cd.


There is a complete Raiders 2CD that I released. All the cues are without sound effects.

There was never an expanded TOD release...EVER.

I believe the HD versions of the first two movies were just 720p. I could be wrong.

And I always find it funny when people want a movie "just the way it looked in theaters"...20 years later. Do you really think you remember it?


If I want 'Raiders' the way I remember it looking, I'll need to get ahold of a 35mm print scratched to shit.
Post
#270616
Topic
WTF? Anna Nicole Smith Dies!
Time
Originally posted by: Stinky-Dinkins
Originally posted by: TheCassidy
Wow...didn't see this one coming...


Either you're a master of sarcasm or an idiot.


Very much tongue-in-cheek sarcasm. This lady had train wreck written all over her, and to be honest I'm surprised it took this long.

I'm thinking stock in Trim-Spa just went down...it sucks for her new daughter, though...
Post
#270615
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
I love Duel, too many people find it too boring to sit through, which is sad and unfortunate. Honestly by the time you get to the end ever second was worth it. Duel isn't a film, it is an experience

Good point about trilogies. Seriously I would have loved for there to have been a good number of Indiana Jones movies. I am sorry they stopped at three, I would have been in line at the cinema for as many Indy movies as they would be willing to throw at us. But that isn't what happened. They made three and for as long as I can remember there has been a rumor of a fourth. I guess we all kind of gave up on it, then we saw TPM and decided maybe it is best a fourth Indy never happened. I guess the PT just has us all concerned about what this may end up being. Maybe we shouldn't be using the PT as our standard. There is no reason Indy 4 can't be a good movie. While I don't agree that ol' Steven knows no wrong when it comes to movies, I have not personally been a fan of his recent stuff, there is no reason Indy 4 automatically has to suck or even to be the blacksheep of the Indy movies. Thanks Cassidy, you got me looking on the bright side of this.

*C3PX walks away smiling while Monty Python sings Always Look on the Bright Side of Life in the background*


LOL - no problem, man.

Your point is well taken about being aprehensive about the film based on the Prequels. The fan base for Star Wars is pretty much the same fan base for Indiana Jones, so cynicism is to be expected as we've become a pretty disilluisioned lot, but every major participant with the exception of Douglas Slocombe (Deholm Elliot, Pat Roach, Lawrence Kasdan...) is back for Indy IV, so I have no reason to believe that it will be shit until I see it.

Post
#270605
Topic
The Go-Mer-Tonic™ Thread - Today's Topic: Whose your favorite author and why?
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
In America it is common practice to circumcise our sons, but why? You all say you are circumcised and that it doesn't bother you, and it shouldn't. But have you ever wondered why you were circumcised? If you are Jewish or Muslim it is not even an issue, you have your answer, but for the rest of us, why?



Honestly, it's a practice dating back centuries and most kids (who I assume make up the demographic here) born in the 70's and 80's were circumcised.

It wasn't until it became unfashionable with all this pseudo hippy bullshit parenting in the 90's that the practice started being frowned upon. Personally, I'm just glad I don't have to worry about...uh...maintenance.
Post
#270599
Topic
Info & Help: Looking for... Raiders Of The Lost Ark - on HDTV
Time
Originally posted by: skyjedi2005
has anyone actually ever done a HDtoDVD project with Raiders of the Lost Ark or Temple of doom theatrical versions?

They would be awesome having the 2.0 sound mix and just the original way they looked in theaters without lowry cleanup.

If not does anyone know where you can download them, I don't need a link just a hint for what to look for on google.

Was a HD broadcast on last crusade ever done?

also these files must be like 15 gigs at least.

Has anyone ever captured the audio off the THX VHS tapes ?

years ago they were supposed to release full bitrate PCM audio versions of the trilogy on laserdisc under the THX laserdisc program sadly they were cancelled and never released.

and regardless of whatever anyone thinks on these boards I like the digital audio letterbox laserdisc with CX noise reduction, soundtrack John Willams music has suprising better fidelity on this release over the current dvd one.

Sure the 5.1 ambience is nice and is based on burt's original 6 track but the sound effects tend to drown the music and dialogue out.

And there was no isolated tracks on the dvd's purhaps someone could create one from the expanded cd release and LP for at least raiders. I know film score monthly released a expanded temple of doom cd.

The only expanded last crusade I know of is a bootleg CD. and as much as I like last crusade's music they cheaped out and did not use the LSO like on the first 2 films hopefully on Indy IV they will be back with maestro williams.


DJ attempted an HD2DVD of 'Raiders' but it gave him a really hard time because the commercial cuts were throwing everything off. Apart from a really nice picture, the only difference between the HD broadcast and the commercially available DVD was the TV edited dialogue track with no swearing.

Post
#270597
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Ever heard of a Spielberg film called Duel? Personally I loved it, but plenty of people have described that film as shit. Yes, even worse than Hook. Anybody else seen Duel?

I think by making a fourth Indy movie they are killing the balance. The three movies are great, the second one could be better, but it is enjoyable enough. It is weird to think it will no longer be a trilogy, since that is what it has been for so long. Also Ford it looking a little old. My general reflex about the idea of a fourth Indiana Jones is "NO!" but I think it will be one worth hitting the cinema for. If it sucks just don't add it to your collection. As long as the other three are still around...


Duel is awesome. It's Jaws with a truck - what's not to love? Plus, for a directorial debut, and a made-for-TV film to boot, it's an amazing piece of work.

I think we need to re-think the paradigm of trilogies. Qaudrologies are the new Trilogies, lol. There's a big difference between a trilogy, and a film series that has 3 films in it. Lord Of The Rings - definately a trilogy. Star Wars OT - definately a trilogy. The story is contingent upon the others, and things that are established in the first one reach their conclusion and resolution in the third.

Indiana Jones, Die Hard, Rambo etc...are series that have 3 films (currently) in them. Nothing happens in 'Raiders' that reaches resolution in 'Last Crusade.' They are three-act films in and of themselves, but there is nothing established in the first film that needs to be resolved in the third. Indiana Jones has a character arc in each movie, but not one in the overall series, like say, Luke Skywalker or Frodo.

If a character is enjoyable, I see no reason that provided the quality remains high, that a series can't have multiple installments. Witness James Bond - sure he's had some crummy films in the series, but 'Casino Royale' is invigorating and introducing the character to a whole new generation.

Post
#270562
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: Davis
Filmmaking is not what it was in the 70's/80's- everything has a different feel to it. Really quick cuts, really glossy feel, and mediocre music for the most part.

I think that unless they make a conscious effort to do it in the old style of the previous ones (and if John Williams can deliver the type of score that he used to be able to) it will be a flop.



Yes. That's true.

What isn't true is that we're not talking about White Chicks. This is Indiana Jones - with Michael Kahn editing, as he has with the previous 3 installments. Take a look at Spielberg's recent films and I think you know what to expect. Apart from 1941, the man does not direct shit.

C'mon, let's have a little optimism here.
Post
#270457
Topic
New Ralph McQuarrie Book
Time
*sigh*

At the risk of sounding too cntroversial, I am so over McQuarrie.

I dig his stuff, but parading around his work like he's Michaelfiggingangelo is ridiculous.

The film industry, especially Star Wars, has become so self-congratulatory...he painted some paintings for some movies that became hugely popular...he didn't cure lepers or anything.
Post
#270392
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
I'm not sure if it counts, but didn't Young Indy establish that Indy had aged perfectly normally, as he was an old man narrating the events in the '90s?


Which has been conveniently excised from versions released after their initial television run.

Take a look at 'Mystery Of The Blues.' Ford has a great looking Indy in that episode, which takes place in the 1950's.
Post
#270391
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: SpaceOddity
Originally posted by: TheCassidy
Originally posted by: JediSage
The cup thing is often debated on Indiana Jones fansites. What the Knight says is basically the price of immortality is the cup cannot pass the seal. Now, Indy and Henry Sr. don't take the cup past the seal, but Elsa does, causing the cataclysmic implosion of the temple. So, are they immortal since they didn't take it past the seal, or do her actions cost them everlasting life? I'm thinking the latter.


I always thought Indy and his dad couldn't have been immortal because they left the temple. As the Knight said, the price for immortality was that they had to remain there forever. The other Knight left and died of extreme old age, which is what ADM touched on. Indy and his dad aren't immortal because they drank from the grail, but they could be aging a lot slower... Hence the possibility of an Indy movie in the present day. That would be an interesting idea, but I don't know how well it could be pulled off.



Not exactly. What the Knght said is that the price of immortality is the Grail cannot pass beyond the seal. Doesn't mean someone couldn't drink from the cup and leave. But Elsa crosses the seal, and there you have it.
Post
#270361
Topic
Indiana Jones IV
Time
Originally posted by: JediSage
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
What if it was set in modern day? Since Indy and Henry Sr. drank from the cup of life, they could pull a Green Mile and have them aging very slowly. Not that I think this would happen, but it would be a very interesting plot twist. Perhaps more interesting than Soviets-under-Kruschev as the bad guys.

Maybe in a star-powered crossover, Indiana Jones and Robert Langdon can debate about whether or not the Holy Grail really was a cup.


I've wondered about the cup drinking since I first saw Last Crusade. It is an interesting premise. Too bad Denholm Elliot isn't still around. He was classic in that movie.


Nah, he was classic in 'Raiders' but a total fool in 'Last Crusade.'

The cup thing is often debated on Indiana Jones fansites. What the Knight says is basically the price of immortality is the cup cannot pass the seal. Now, Indy and Henry Sr. don't take the cup past the seal, but Elsa does, causing the cataclysmic implosion of the temple. So, are they immortal since they didn't take it past the seal, or do her actions cost them everlasting life? I'm thinking the latter.

As far as villains go, they are shooting in and around LA as well as the jungle, and have apparently scouted San Francisco. The new Indiana Jones video game in the works has sequences in San Francisco with the Chinese Triads as the villains. Recently, there has been NO NEWS at all of this game, which is kind of weird.

It's got me to thinking that they are somehow related, meaning we could see Chinese Triads going after Indy, maybe a bunch of Lao Che's goons, I don't know.

I just hope the movie isn't too on the nose, and that it stays away from constantly winking at the audience. Each sequel had it's nods to the others, to be sure, but I don't want to see things like "Oh, there's the idol, hey, check it out - there's the Ark." Hopefully it's sentimental in the right spots and not too cheesy.
Post
#270358
Topic
Movie Making: Tools of the Trade (opinions from Mac Folks welcome)
Time
Couple more things...

For a beginner, FCP is way more user friendly than Premiere. When you look at the screen, it just makes sense. There's my video tracks, there's my audio tracks, perfect. There's my master window, there's my edit window, cool.

I always found Premiere's layout to be confusing and convoluted. One of the biggest turnoffs for someone starting out is a confusing layout. Same goes for After Effects, which, unfortunately is the route you're going to have to go if you want something "affordable."

I can't say enough good things about FCP, it is such a well designed program and everything is really intuitive. I'd seriously stay away from Premiere unless you know what you're doing.
Post
#270356
Topic
Movie Making: Tools of the Trade (opinions from Mac Folks welcome)
Time
Originally posted by: JediSage
I'm looking to do some basic movie making with a DV camera. Mostly so I can learn it. Not sure what my options are as far as what good packages (editing, low-level effects, soundtracks, etc) are available. I keep seeing Final Cut for mac, but as always my problem with that is the Macs are so expensive. Would FC run on an iMac vs the Mac Pro? Is there a good WinTel equivalent to the FC studio? Can anyone recommend a reasonably priced camera?


Dude, spring the dough for a Mac because by the time you get a PC with enough RAM and processor speed to cut down on rendering time, you're in Mac range anyway.

It's so damned easy on a Mac it's ridiculous. Shoot movie. Plug camera in. Dump footage. Import to FCP. Edit away.

Post
#270355
Topic
great quote on the radio re the changes
Time
Originally posted by: Puggo - Jar Jar's "Yoda"
Yesterday I was listening to the John & Ken show on the local radio station... they were discussing having watched Star Wars on television the night before. The hosts commented that the 1977 special effects didn't stand the test of time, and the example they used was -- the scene with Han and Jabba!!!

George, are you listening?


Oh, I KNOW. It's so bad. He doesn't even look like Jabba but a fat Scottish dude, instead.
Post
#270353
Topic
NON-Star Wars Fan Edit and Alternate DVD Covers SHOWCASE
Time
Originally posted by: ReverendBeastly
Originally posted by: TheCassidy
Nice, but you've got the aspect ratios wrong. Dark_Jedi's HD2DVD transfers of 'Monster Squad' and 'Twilight Zone: The Movie' are both 1.85:1, and DD 5.1.

And you've still got the aspect ratios wrong! They're both 1.78:1. On a widescreen TV display, 1.85:1 still has small black bars at the top and bottom of the screen, whereas 1.78:1 fills the whole screen.

I'm a nitpicker for aspect ratios


Those were the specs DJ gave me. BTW, 'From Beyond' is going out to you on Friday when I make my weekly mailings, cool?