logo Sign In

TV's Frink

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
22-Jul-2009
Last activity
19-Oct-2018
Posts
63,443

Post History

Post
#1228278
Topic
Is Star Wars "Better Than It's Ever Been"?
Time

moviefreakedmind said:

TV’s Frink said:

I’d rather have more content than less.

Depends on the content.

No, because I just ignore what I don’t like or don’t care about. See the animated shows, for example.

Back then I had three movies.

Now you don’t even have those, just illegal bootlegs of them.

Now I have seven.

Actually you have ten and several different versions of most of them along with cartoons and shows and books and TV and other stuff.

I’m talking my canon. I have seven movies. And Harmy’s versions are enough for me. Illegal or not.

Now wins.

Not for me it doesn’t.

Now wins for me. Hope this clarifies things.

And I’m not sorry.

That goes without saying. Why would you be sorry about that?

I was teasing. Warbler said “sorry no” in his response right above mine.

I believe this answers Warbler’s follow-up post as well. If not, oh well. I’m not sorry :p

Post
#1228206
Topic
Taking a stand against toxic fandom (and other )
Time

DrDre said:

oojason said:

DrDre said:

TV’s Frink said:

In my view Photoshopping her head on a hulk body is not fair game.

Is creating a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad fair game? In my view it is. That’s the way free speech works, and that right should be defended in my view, even if you disagree with what is depicted. If creating a caricature of a Prophet is fair game, then so is creating a caricature of the Star Wars character Rey. If it was a caricature of Daisy Ridley, that attempts to ridicule her personally, then I would agree with you.

That’s free speech - not toxicity. For many people they would consider a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad to be toxic, and in my view rightly so.

Well, I disagree. The only toxicity I see is in those that cannot accept the foundations of a free, and democratic society. As such, any point of view that is too foreign relative to someone’s own is considered to be toxic, evil, communist, degraded, or any other term used to label people or put them in a box for having a different or controversial opinion.

I don’t know what this is supposed to mean. Calling out someone for being shitty is not the same as shutting down free speech and democratic society.

The use of “communist” here is a weird thing as well. It has no bearing on the topic at hand.

I think I’m done here.