logo Sign In

TV's Frink

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
22-Jul-2009
Last activity
19-Oct-2018
Posts
63,443

Post History

Post
#393983
Topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Time

Davnes007 said:

Man.....this whole thing concerning VINH sounds familiar to me for some reason.

Exactly.

Akwat Kbrana said:

TV's Frink said:

I've heard a lot of good about this TPM review and I'm looking forward to watching it in the next few days.  I did sample it a bit after burning it, and I'm not sure I can take the dude's voice for 70 minutes.  But we'll see.

Don't forget that the youtube segments are about ten minutes each, so you can easily watch the review by segment rather than all in one sitting. :)

I was already going to watch it over a couple sittings, but good point.

Post
#393958
Topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Time

Vaderisnothayden said:

Please drop this myth that I get offended by people just disagreeing with me. Had you merely disagreed with me, such as saying you didn't believe the PT should be called EU and saying you believed we should stick to the official definition of the eu, I would have disagreed with you, but I would not have gotten offended.

I don't think it's your buisiness to criticise me, nor do I think you have license to poke fun at me. (And you have done a lot worse than merely "tease".)

We've both gone off topic so I don't want spend too much more time on this.  Call it a myth if you want, but I stand by belief that you are too sensitive and you get offended at the drop of a hat.  I've read through plenty of your other posts (ones I was not involved in) and it seems obvious to me.

You're right, "teasing" was a poor word for me to use, as we do not have a friendly relationship.  "Mock" would have been more fair.  I don't think it's your place to tell me that I have no business criticizing you.  If you want me to stop, either prove me wrong, ignore me, or go complain to your Moth3r or Jay-daddy.  I hope you do go complain - I suspect they'll tell you to get over yourself.  If I'm wrong, I'll drop it.

Akwat Kbrana said:

Vaderisnothayden said:

Expanded universes are an idea that exists outside Star wars. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expanded_universe We can thus acknowledge the existence of a Star wars eu without having to follow Lucasfilm's definition of it.

And you go by wikipedia's definition of eu? How follow-the-herd.

Lol.  Nice one :-)

Now then...

I've heard a lot of good about this TPM review and I'm looking forward to watching it in the next few days.  I did sample it a bit after burning it, and I'm not sure I can take the dude's voice for 70 minutes.  But we'll see.

Post
#393910
Topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Time

Vaderisnothayden said:

Chewtobacca said:

That was neither clear nor obvious to me as an impartial observer.  Your post stating, "TPM IS eu," came across as a simple factual correction to the poster before you.  You did not preface the statement with a phrase, such as "from my point of view" or "it could be argued", that might have made it clear that you were rejecting the accepted definition of EU. 

I had exactly the same thought as TV's Frink when I saw your post.  If he had not posted a link to a definition, I would have been sorely tempted to do so. 

That would have been assuming I was too dumb to know the official definition of EU.  I try to avoid making such assumptions about people when there's another obvious explanation. Like if you didn't assume I was dumb you'd figure I knew the official version and was discarding it. The view that the pt is eu despite Lucasfilm's view is common enough. 

VINH (see, I'm using your correct name now, as you are using mine), I appreciate that you are acknowledging my presence once again (no sarcasm intended).  I apologized for my childish name calling and I shall do so again here.

However, I continue to insist that you are too sensitive for your own good.  My linking to the Wookieepedia article was not an attempt to call you "dumb."  Believe me, I have read plenty of your posts on the EU to know that you are familiar with the official definition.  I just didn't feel like typing out a long argument on the subject.  And frankly, I knew it would annoy you a little, again, because you are too sensitive.

I really think you take yourself too seriously in these debates.  I will continue to make fun of you (and similar posters like skyjedi) because I do not take these debates too seriously.  I know my teasing will continue to "offend" you, but there's little I can do about that.  But I will refrain from calling you names again.

The PT kicks the OT's ass!!!!!!!!!!! (kidding)

-TVF

 

Post
#393870
Topic
RedLetterMedia's Revenge of Nadine [TPM 108 pg Resp. [RotS Review+RotS Preview+ST'09 Reveiw+Next Review Teaser+2002 Interview+AotC OutTakes+Noooooo! Doc.+SW Examiner Rebuttal+AotC Review+TPM Review]
Time

Not really. I admit that I don't know a thing about the EU (other than reading the Thraw Trilogy years ago). I just like Wookieepedia because it has a clever name and it has a page for my buddy Ric.

My opinion is that the EU is how you define it.  I don't have a problem with you or anyone else saying that everything is EU except for the OT.  I certainly understand why you feel that way and won't try to convince you otherwise.  But I enjoy the PT (well, the fanedits of the PT, anyway), and so for me, anything except the OT and PT is the EU.

 

Post
#393771
Topic
Iron Man 2
Time

Vaderisnothayden said:

ABC said:

Still, here again a new american cinema shit. (Is that racist?... Don't mind. Oh! About that, what about the US law wich obligates Hollywood & Co to have at least one black man/woman to appear in the films... I don't call that racism, I call that Hypocrisis).

Fools !

 Is there actually such a law or did you just mean that figuratively?

Wow.  Seriously?  Of course it's a law.  The problem is, finding a black man/woman who can act and looks like an actor is difficult.  A man/woman is kind of rare anyway, and most of them don't want people to know of their condition.