- Post
- #208726
- Topic
- ***//BUILDING EMPIRE\\: PAL & NTSC DVD - NEW EDITION NOW ONLINE! ***
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208726/action/topic#208726
- Time
TR47
This user has been banned.
- User Group
- Banned Members
- Join date
- 16-Nov-2003
- Last activity
- 26-Jun-2007
- Posts
- 388
Post History
- Post
- #208361
- Topic
- The Official 2006 Discs Will Be No Better Than What We Have!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208361/action/topic#208361
- Time
Originally posted by: THX
The most likely scenario, IMHO, is the one painted by zombie84. LFL would want an anamorphic 24p disc, two reasons not to use the D1/D2 master. Given the advances in video technology, they'd want to do a new telecine/digital scan form the best available source, which would be the '93 interpositive. All this is entirely consistent with Jim Ward's comments, both on starwars.com and in the USA today article. The quote about video quality, which is from the journalist, not Ward (although he is presumably paraphrasing Ward) is: The original films' video quality will not match up to that of the restored versions. This seems most likely to refer to the fact that these editions will not have the digital "restoration" as performed by Lowry for the 2004 editions. To me, this is another plus point.
Now, the worst case scenario is that these are just being compressed from the D1/D2 letterbox masters used for the DefCol & "Faces" LDs (and the last VHS release). Even if this is the case, they will still be the best available version of the OOT on DVD: I will be happy to buy them and I strongly urge everyone else to do the same. This is a good example of an opportunity to vote with our wallets. We all want the OOT to live on into future formats and support for this product now is the best way to encourage that. If it is a big hit, LFL (other than Lucas) and Fox will want to keep re-releasing it to make more money - which is great for us. If it is boycotted because 'it should have been better', there will be no future for top quality versions of the OOT on home video.
The most likely scenario, IMHO, is the one painted by zombie84. LFL would want an anamorphic 24p disc, two reasons not to use the D1/D2 master. Given the advances in video technology, they'd want to do a new telecine/digital scan form the best available source, which would be the '93 interpositive. All this is entirely consistent with Jim Ward's comments, both on starwars.com and in the USA today article. The quote about video quality, which is from the journalist, not Ward (although he is presumably paraphrasing Ward) is: The original films' video quality will not match up to that of the restored versions. This seems most likely to refer to the fact that these editions will not have the digital "restoration" as performed by Lowry for the 2004 editions. To me, this is another plus point.
Now, the worst case scenario is that these are just being compressed from the D1/D2 letterbox masters used for the DefCol & "Faces" LDs (and the last VHS release). Even if this is the case, they will still be the best available version of the OOT on DVD: I will be happy to buy them and I strongly urge everyone else to do the same. This is a good example of an opportunity to vote with our wallets. We all want the OOT to live on into future formats and support for this product now is the best way to encourage that. If it is a big hit, LFL (other than Lucas) and Fox will want to keep re-releasing it to make more money - which is great for us. If it is boycotted because 'it should have been better', there will be no future for top quality versions of the OOT on home video.
- Post
- #208345
- Topic
- Pizza Stone v.2
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/208345/action/topic#208345
- Time
- Post
- #207724
- Topic
- Bad News For Men
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/207724/action/topic#207724
- Time
- Post
- #207502
- Topic
- Info: The LID Project: Laserdisc is dead.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/207502/action/topic#207502
- Time
Originally posted by: SephirothTNH
I've seen other
Preservation threads get closed down because an
official dvd existed even if you did have to order it
from another country, Ong-Bak. It seems like we have
some double standards here. X0 as well as any
straight preservation of the OOT should now be
considered bootleg.
I've seen other
Preservation threads get closed down because an
official dvd existed even if you did have to order it
from another country, Ong-Bak. It seems like we have
some double standards here. X0 as well as any
straight preservation of the OOT should now be
considered bootleg.
I'm glad at least someone else noticed this; all I really wanted was a reasonable explanation of why my thread was closed. I can handle it being closed, but even after making an irrefutable argument in its defense, I was brushed off. I find that insulting and hypocritical, since others have provided titles which already do exist and are domestically available, and yet are allowed to get away with it.
- Post
- #206019
- Topic
- ORIGINAL STAR WARS TRILOGY OUT 09/2006 BY LUCASFILM
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/206019/action/topic#206019
- Time
- Post
- #205780
- Topic
- Info Wanted: Gettysburg - 270 min LD cut - has anyone done a preservation of this?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/205780/action/topic#205780
- Time
- Post
- #203241
- Topic
- New Star Trek Movie
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/203241/action/topic#203241
- Time
- Post
- #202803
- Topic
- Info Wanted: a 'Battlestar Galactica 1980' preservation?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/202803/action/topic#202803
- Time
- Post
- #201431
- Topic
- A SPARK OF HOPE FOR LASERMAN
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/201431/action/topic#201431
- Time
On another note...
Originally posted by: Zion
Just a tip guys, if you select "quasi cash" as the transaction type, paypal will not charge YIYF a fee upon receipt of your donation.
Just a tip guys, if you select "quasi cash" as the transaction type, paypal will not charge YIYF a fee upon receipt of your donation.
Where is this listed at? I think the fees are the same for Paypal, regardless of the transaction type. You're essentially paying them to move numbers around in their accounts. If it's different, I'd be interested in knowing about it.
TR
- Post
- #200651
- Topic
- Question regarding sound sync issues
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/200651/action/topic#200651
- Time
- Post
- #200072
- Topic
- Question regarding sound sync issues
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/200072/action/topic#200072
- Time
- Post
- #197467
- Topic
- Help: looking for... 'Galaxy Quest' - the workprint...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/197467/action/topic#197467
- Time
- Post
- #197171
- Topic
- BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/197171/action/topic#197171
- Time
- Post
- #196821
- Topic
- The Double Standard
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/196821/action/topic#196821
- Time
I find it rather infuriating that people can freely release titles like The Game and Blade Runner, solely because they have better picture quality, yet are easily available commercially. The only real difference between them is the video quality and the extras included. I decided to release something that has improved audio quality over the commercially released version and is also the original cut, and it's somehow not ok to do so. This is just hypocrisy, because you can't deem one release is ok and another isn't just because one has better video and one has better audio. I was chastised "just" because it was a DTS version. Blade Runner "just" has better resolution. What exactly is the difference (barring the extras)?
Yes, the original cut of Ong Bak with English subs can be purchased from Australia, which is fine, if you like watching a sped up version with inferior audio. The Game and Blade Runner can both be purchased domestically, and are the same cuts, yet the only improvement is the video quality. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful for these improved releases, but I'm thoroughly baffled.
My problem is this: How does improved video quality alone make it ok? What exactly is the criteria for an acceptable release? How can there be this double standard?
I get the strong suspicion that my thread being locked has very little to do with it being "piracy", and more to do with my status on this board, which some view as less than desirable. I don't really mind the rules being enforced, but if they are going to be, then they need to apply to everyone equally, and not just because of the whims of the moderators.
To summarize:
The Game:
Only difference is anamorphic video and LD extras
Ong Bak:
Original cut in NTSC with Eng subs & DTS audio
In terms of differences, my DVD actually has more of them, not less.
I'd like a logical explanation about this, and why one is ok and one isn't.
- Post
- #196352
- Topic
- Ong-Bak: Thai Warrior Original Version
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/196352/action/topic#196352
- Time
- Post
- #196071
- Topic
- Ong-Bak: Thai Warrior Original Version
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/196071/action/topic#196071
- Time
Search for Ong-Bak on Demonoid, as I can't post a direct link.
- Post
- #195989
- Topic
- Ong-Bak: Thai Warrior Original Version
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/195989/action/topic#195989
- Time
dark_jedi:
No, I don't have a demonoid membership. Do you, or can you get me one?
- Post
- #195779
- Topic
- Ong-Bak: Thai Warrior Original Version
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/195779/action/topic#195779
- Time
- Post
- #194984
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/194984/action/topic#194984
- Time
- Post
- #194841
- Topic
- DVD Labels
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/194841/action/topic#194841
- Time
Just a note, My V2 is anamorphic, not letterbox. Other than that those labels look great.
- Post
- #194039
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the Best Quality OT Fan Preservation Set?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/194039/action/topic#194039
- Time
Imagine what you could do by taking a colour/gamma corrected DVD, and using the X0 transfer (to fix the SE elements), and one of the DVB captures (to fix certain DVD defects). One day, maybe...
That is a possibility, but the X0 will most likely be the new standard. Your idea seems like it would require more effort and time than any one person could possibly muster.
- Post
- #194002
- Topic
- Info Wanted: What is the Best Quality OT Fan Preservation Set?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/194002/action/topic#194002
- Time
My set does have its flaws, but I specifically wanted to concentrate more on sound quality than video quality, because that is what makes Star Wars great, and also because no other transfer has PCM audio. Personally, I could care less about a few extra lines of resolution if I have to listen to dull, compressed audio. This is just my opinion and I don't expect anyone to concur, so save your comments.
Hopefully, once the X0 project is complete, it will put this thread to rest as I'm sure it will be the new standard, and there will be no further disputes as to which is best.
- Post
- #193880
- Topic
- Heat: The Action Edit (Released)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/193880/action/topic#193880
- Time
- Post
- #193559
- Topic
- Ong-Bak: Thai Warrior Original Version
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/193559/action/topic#193559
- Time