logo Sign In

TM2YC

User Group
Members
Join date
25-Apr-2013
Last activity
5-Sep-2024
Posts
3,634

Post History

Post
#705047
Topic
[fill in the blank] Just Died!
Time

*Sigh* Giger was one of the reasons why I asked for an airbrush and set of inks for my 12th birthday. This...

...is still one of my favourite artbooks. FYI He didn't just draw the Alien creatures and props...

It's a shame he didn't have that same level in involvement in the rest of the franchise because they would have been much improved IMO.

Post
#704871
Topic
The Secret History of Star Wars Audiobook Giveaway!
Time

ryanvb said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Wow! Free code for a free book on Audible if you sign up for a free trial,

or

free book on Audible if you sign up for a free trial.

So sad I missed out on the awesome exclusive deal. So jealous of the 5 that got that code!

There is a difference. The code means no trial is necessary.  The trial requires a credit card.

 Okay fair enough, my apologies.

Post
#704813
Topic
What we like about the Prequels
Time

Easterhay said:

imperialscum said:


Anakin was an extremely annoying unlikable jerk.

you've decided to picture Anakin as the way you want him to be. There's nothing in the OT to suggest he was beyond reproach apart from Obi-wan, an old man who was telling it how he saw it and had a hidden agenda anyway - why would he tell Luke his father was an arse if he wanted Luke to honour his death and kill the man apparently responsible?

 We know Anakin was a great guy because Alec Guinness can actually act. When he says "and a good friend" it is said with such a glowing genuine warmth and wistful nostalgia, it simply couldn't have been any other way. On the other hand when Guinness replys to Luke's question of "How did my father die" with a deep intake of breath and roll of the eyes, we know we aren't gonna get the whole story.... again this is acting beyond what is on the page. The OT didn't just have a great script it had amazing actors reading it out... unlike the PT which had neither (Also having a good editor who knows a great performance helps too).

Post
#704810
Topic
<strong>STAR WARS: REBELS</strong> (animated tv series) - a general discussion thread
Time

Tobar said:

Was reading another interview Dave did for Nerdist and then this awesomeness came up:

Joel Aron and I very consciously decided to make it like what you saw in the ’70s... the blades in the prequels actually... taper to a very specific sword point.

 Huh.

and holy mother of dragons, it would have been awesome if this had been hand animated and looked like this...

Post
#704595
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

ITV (One of the older UK TV channels) has been running the PT over the last few weeks and I've dipped in to them when channel hopping. ITV seem to always chop down the films they show to 16:9... because they are philistines clearly. So these were 16:9 versions of the PT.

My gods, if you thought the PT looked bad in scope, then you ain't seen nothing yet. Zoomed like this they look soft to the point of cheesy and cheap daytime soap-opera and being closeup on the actors faces further reveals how horribly, horribly these films are edited together e.g. TPM uses shots of Cpt Paneka quickly glancing off camera at the crew/director/something while speaking (Like he was reading lines off of an idiot board). I hadn't seen how bad these moments are at the distnce that scope provides and the SFX looks considerably worse. So sloppy for films produced on these budgets.

Contrast that, with me repeatedly watching ANH footage (Almost frame-by-frame) for my 'Lost Workprint' cut and it's night and day. I reccomend the next time anybody watches ANH, they just train there eyes on Alec Guinness' face. There is a whole 'nother film going on there while the action is happening and the other actors are talking.