- Post
- #442672
- Topic
- Reasonable posts thread (all posts must be reasonable, no visible pictures, no fink-isms)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/442672/action/topic#442672
- Time
A B C said:
^
A-freakin'-mazing!!
A B C said:
^
A-freakin'-mazing!!
Thanks?
ANAKIN: You are so beautiful!
PADME: It's only because I'm so in love . . .
ANAKIN: No, it's because I'm so in love with you.
PADME: So love has blinded you?
ANAKIN: Well, that's not exactly what I meant . . .
PADME: But it's probably true!
They laugh.
xhonzi said:
...VIII. It was interesting to see some other locales and planets. Naboo was nice to look at it. After the OT did "Forest Planet, Jungle Planet, Ice Planet, Cloud Planet, and Desert Planet" it left a lot of people thinking, "What's left?!" But of course, "Tuscany Planet, City Planet, Volcano Planet, 50's Diner Planet, Stormy Oil Rig Planet, and Honey We Shrunk the Kids and put them in a Day Glow Mushroom Kingdom Planet" were yet to come. If only that darn, out of the way, "furthest from the bright center of the galaxy" planet didn't keep coming up so often.
Too bad there isn't Pay Extra Attention To or a Stalk specific user feature. The total opposite of the Ignore feature.
TV's Frink said:
Sluggo for the loss!
Maybe then I'll fit into these old pants.
Come to think of it...
These Old Pants
JediTray said:
Bingowings said:
Is this an example of the sort of tactics Ewoks and Rebels would use against the Empire?
No, it's yet another example of Frink filling a thread with off-topic nonsense.
To some, it's no more nonsensical than ferocious ewoks and adding bloody stumps.
Ripplin said:
I don't know if it was ever mentioned, but were there ever any official transport ship model available, perhaps from MPC?
MicroMachines made a playset one or two.
Radi0n said:
Hell no! :)
Funny performance, real funny, but there's only One God! :)
He even endorses and promotes his own material! ;)
My favorite line from this is "Luuuke... Chapter 2"
Nope, not a hipster.
Honestly, when ever I listen to Radiohead it just doesn't do it for me. I throw in some Talking Heads and that does the trick.
TV's Frink said:
Sluggo for the win!
Erikstormtrooper said:
none, very nice!
Sluggo concurs. Very nice!
I found that old thread on the original crawl, complete with discussion of specks of dirt.
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-1977-Crawl/topic/6555/page/1/
Bingowings said:
The sin offering is they type of offering, in contrast to the burnt offering. It was an offering of animal sacrifice, mostly of anointing the sacrificial altar with the blood of the animal. The burnt offering is a different category where the sacrificial animal is generally consumed in flame on the altar.
In the instances of these specific sacrifices in question, the word sin is attached to the name of the offering rather than the action it is purifying.
I've seen more shameless.
Hey! A super saver! Lucky!
sean wookie said:
...
Do I have to dress nice? I'd imagine I shouldn't wear a Rage Against The Machine shirt.
I'd suppose you may want to dress nicer. I'm curious to hear about your experience.
Warbler said:
I, for one, do not believe that the Levitical laws were inspired by God. They just don't make sense. Callings a woman's menstrual cycle, something they can't avoid doing, a sin??? An all knowing all powerful god would not be that stupid.
I wouldn't say that the text goes as far as saying it is a sin, but rather that it is uncleanliness. To keep the people of Israel in a state of Holiness, which is what the Levitical laws were for, the impurity of blood and menstruation must be dealt with.
Maybe you would call it semantics, but the difference seems clear to me.
Is there anything here you could use?
It was, but they changed the name when it went to syndication, so that show about those school kids kept its harmony.
A snappy salute to you, sir! That's just what I needed. Ditto to A B C.