Yeah it was a lie, but the fact that he was scarred he was able to use that as evidence he was attacked.
Palpatine used his disfigurement against the Jedi in the senate. Saying the attack had left him "scarred and deformed."
The TPM Yoda puppet has been replaced by a CG one like in AOTC and ROTS, it just has not been released to the public on DVD yet, but there is a brief snippet of it on the ROTS DVD so that argument is a moot point now. But if you were stuck in a swamp for several years, some different you would look! Plus I don't think Palpatine looks so different in those two comparison pics you posted. You also have to remember Ian aged over 20 years since the make up was last applied by a different make up artist, and in ROTS he is seen unhooded and in many differing lighting enviroments as opposed to being stuck pretty much in the throne room in ROTJ. Whatever differences there were in the Emperor's face from ROTS to ESB/ROTJ could easily have come in the 20 some years between the movies.
Shadowman99 said:
doubleofive said:
doubleofive said:
That's what I'm saying! Obi-Wan is tiny! I've always found his close-ups funny in this scene because I'm imagining them zooming in on a tiny Alec Guiness!
After thinking about it, I'm guessing they had him tiny so that they could have this shot:
which is cool, but weird if Obi-Wan is standing 15 feet behind Yoda and impossible if Obi-Wan is just made larger.
Alright, back to mini-Obi-Wan for a second. I think this shot could work if we go for the "Obi-Wan is standing really far away from everyone". Yoda would have to be out of focus while Obi-Wan is talking, then as he is vanishing Yoda would come into focus, rack focus style. If focuspuller on the boards is really a focus puller, he could tell us more about it.
I can't think of any OT FX shots that used rack focus or DOF. I'm not sure they could have done it with the technology of the time.
I always thought Obi Wan was standing away from Yoda and this was a perspective thing. The branch is the one shot screws it up, but like the tiny TIE in Jedi it's a mistake in the layer order. I hope Adywan includes a fix.
What is wrong with this scene? Because one or both should be out of focus? Just because something is not technically correct, doesn't mean it isn't romantically correct.
So there will be no Jabba's palace music number, or you will be reverting back to Lapti Nek with the static Sy Snootles puppet?
Joshua_Blue said:
GoodMusician, I don't see suggestion to remove the tape from the tubes Vader cuts in the Suggestion Terminal.
Here is a picture posted by Darth Stewie.
To add to this, Ady could make the cut parts glow like some things do in the prequels when a lightsaber cuts thru them.
Will someone please show me this redness in the AT ATs? I have never seen it.
I think the cloud city vane shot is a matter of perspective (windows) of where u are viewing it, it looks fine on the DVD to me. On a side note, some people say this entire vane is too small to house the carbonite freezing chamber at the top but if you get the DK Star Wars COMPLETE LOCATIONS book, you will see it fits nicely. Now if someone could just post those stills of the gray tape that turns into black char marks in the next shot on the vane thing vader cuts in half before he cuts off Luke's hand.
seven said:
Love the new gun on the MF. I did always think it never looked right.
Since screen shots are more fun, thought I would give a visual for some suggestions.
We see Boba Fett's Range Finder in the down position. At the bottom of the Range finder is a display lens that clearly has no display. Could we see something there that he may be looking at for the reason the range finder would be down?
In this shot Fett's Chest lights are not really moving, which we see that they do move in the Carbon Chamber scene
Could use some prequel elements of the cockpit graphics, changing then enough to suit this scene. Looks like there is some "blue screen spill" that could be corrected too.
Erikstormtrooper said:
Here's the image I keep going on about. Forget the shadows. If I had to come up with just 2 words to describe what's wrong with screne, they'd be "bad photoshop".
Look at the size of the railing compared to the size of the people. The railing comes up to the middle of their thighs. They look about 10 feet tall! ( I guess that makes Chewie about 14')
The hallway is not wide enough for the railing to be normal size. Am I the only one who sees this?
I've been places where they have low railings (about like the one in that scene) for whatever reason, they are not always just to keep people from falling over them.
