Possessed

Yeah, that's not getting old.

Now that I think about it, I can only even recall one instance in the whole prequel trilogy where a ship goes to lightspeed, in AOTC.  

Of course I haven't seen them in a while.

You must have put alot of vodka in that punch if one cup knocked him out man!

Darth Lucas said:

But I like the idea that he could be even more powerful than Palpatine ever was.  So much so that he was able to deceive Palpatine in believing him to be dead while he waited for the perfect moment to rise up.  It's something that could be extremely cool if it was done well and would actually give the prequels SOME kind of purpose in this saga besides pointlessly setting up the OT and pissing off alot of fans.

 I would hate it if the new villain was "more powerful than palpatine ever was".  That would cheapen the movies that came before it IMHO, and sequels should never cheapen the originals.

He said he dislikes turkey, not red meat

Darth Lucas said:

I have a theory.  Everybody is talking about the hooded figure speculating he may be an ancient warrior of some kind.  What if this character turns out to be Darth Plagueis?  He actually DID manage to save himself from death and has been in some form of hibernation for years and years. The shot from the trailer is him waking up and igniting his lightsaber ready to kick some ass.  The force awakens.  As in the ultimate user of the force awakens.  Huh?  Huh???

I know it's dumb but I love speculation like this ^-^

 I would really hate that.  Palpatine thought he killed him.  And I've always thought he was strong enough with the force/wise enough/aware enough to know whether or not he killed someone.  And he could feel the "disturbance" in the force Luke showed... and he couldn't since a sorth lord?  I would really hate to have Palpatine turned into a little bitch like that :P

I could have sworn it was for a while, but who knows with my mind.

Everybody needs to just calm down.  It's an 80 second teaser and everybody's already picking it apart and saying the movies going to suck based on these things.  Jeez, have a beer and chill out.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Possessed said:

You don't know what I thought!  I personally thought the whole thing was a euphemism. 

LOL. I was being sort of tongue-in-cheek there, but I guess it didn't show.

JFTR, it's just my own personal theology of sorts -- something I'd like to believe in some day.

 Nah, it showed, but responding the way I did was much more fun than saying "Interesting take on the classic stories of humanity my good fellow"

Actually that was sort of fun.

You don't know what I thought!  I personally thought the whole thing was a euphemism. 

RicOlie_2 said:

 I'm not sure, BUT I CAN'T SAY I'M PARTICULARLY SORRY ABOUT IT.

 You already did.

I'M PARTICULARLY SORRY ABOUT IT.

I added no words and changed not the order of the words.

You, sir, are a fraud.

I hardly think think a lunch meat sandwich filled with facial hair is appropriate.

I'm satisfied with that.

Christ.

Make of that what you will.

I see where Frink is coming from but I don't agree.

I don't see "no homo" as meaning to slam or insult homosexuals.  Of course I am not homosexual so I can offer no "personal" insight as to how it feels to hear the phrase, but I can tell you anybody that I've known who uses the phrase is not meaning to be insulting.

It is to me just a humorous way to clear up that you are not a homosexual, even though what you just said might lead people to believe that.  As a "funny" way to stop people from thinking things about you that aren't true.  I never understood it to be an insult to people that are "homo", just to clarify that although they like some characteristic about another member of the same sex, they don't want you to think they are homo.

I don't see it as insulting, but it is unnecessary and tacky, I don't really "approve" of it as a phrase.  I think it's kind of rude and I can see how it *could* be taken offensively, I just don't think that's the intent of people that say it.

So basically you could say I agree with both sides of the argument and this has been one long waste of time neutral post.

Never said it was true, just said it reminded me of it.

Yes, I am bluffing.

Reminds me of how donald duck was banned in finland for a long time because he didn't wear pants.  XD

Since when do even the most proper of ducks wear pants anyway?

Oh well, almost all of my favorite music comes from Finland so I'll give them a pass.

DuracellEnergizer said:

TV's Frink said:

Possessed said:

Pooh and piglet porn is probably to come out soon, although it might not be what we expect.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_34_%28Internet_meme%29

I assumed he was talking about ... ahem ... literal pooh and a literal piglet. 

 Which, sadly, exists as well.

Pooh and piglet porn is probably to come out soon, although it might not be what we expect.

Agreed.  They banned something for being perverse, when really the only thing perverse is thinking about it in a way that they should get offended.

Well okay not ALL of Poland, just a certain town in Poland.  Because of "unclear" sexuality of him.

You'd think, in this day and age, he would be a mandatory acceptance because of that...

At least they didn't ban Winnie the Pooh on playgrounds like Poland did.

Or that.

You can't wipe your asshole with that.

generalfrevious said:

Possessed said:

generalfrevious said:

Possessed said:

Well I'd hate to be that guy to push drugs or drinking on somebody.

 Thank you very much: now I'll go overdose on some heroin.

 Why jump straight to heroin?  I was thinking like some pot.  That'd help you be more at peace with the world, and without overdosing  or dying.  I'm not even being that sarcastic, you really seem like you could use a good joint.  It wouldn't hurt you and it would help with your general despair.

 It's illegal though, even with a prescription. Not to mention if marijuana will even survive climate change.

 Yeah, well where I live you get a greater penalty if caught pirating movies than smoking pot.  Just sayin.

(and I know morally fanediting isn't piracy, but to the law it's pretty hard to say that it isn't.)