Possessed

I’m the opposite really. The ewoks are mostly okay by me, maybe just should have had some trims done in the cutting room. For me jabbas palace is the stinker in Jedi. Not Jabba himself, but all the Muppets he’s surrounded by and the excessive camp and cheese of many segments. (Fucking hate the thermal detonator sequence. If I ever get around to finishing my edit of rotj I’m removing it entirely and just having it inferred Leah and chewie are already there. ) marks performance in Jedi is great enough to not want to dismiss the film entirely though.

So am I like a little to the left of the hammer then? Why Silverwook!? I’ll change!

He later claimed he was joking himself. It may or may not be true, either way I think you’re looking for friendship in Alderaan places.

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

They couldn’t pass Trumpcare so they’ve instead quietly gone for a bill to sell all your private browsing history for profit.

I just happened to come across this today.

https://www.datadoesgood.com/

$15.00 a year going to charity for you to share information that could not possibly hurt you with people who do not know you nor will ever meet you, fuck that, LOL.

In what way is that ordered? Best to worst? Worst to best? Descending order of dogs or other household pets that appear in the film? Ascending order of how often your cat tries to swat the tv while watching? Balls?

darth_ender said:

Oh, we need a little Christmas, right this very minute!

What’s a big Christmas though?

DuracellEnergizer said:

Handman said:

DominicCobb said:

Also, I think it’s pretty clear DE is on the same page as you there.

I don’t. He was one of two instigators which prompted my post.

Are you referring to this?

moviefreakedmind said:

I don’t know, I’d probably rather watch Home Alone 2 than TFA.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Is your taste in film that poor?

If so, I’d like to make it clear that I didn’t know MFM was being serious with that statement; I thought he was making fun of me. So I figured I’d indirectly insult myself – resort to self-deprecating humour in a roundabout manner – as a way of showing there were no hard feelings.

And if one of the two was me I clearly said it was a joke so if you still found it condescending then that’s your problem.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Possessed said:

Mocata said:

Possessed said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

• Labyrinth (1986) – 9/10
• A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987) – 8/10
• Star Wars: Episode VII – The Force Awakens (2015) – 6/10
• Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) – 8/10
• Home Alone (1990) – 7/10
• Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) – 6.5/10
  Okay

Eh I would swap the score for Misery with Raiders and I’m not a big John Hughes fan, but you know I think this is mostly fair.

I watched Slaughterhouse-Five, it’s a cool concept with plenty of interesting ideas despite a few overly comedic bits. There are comparisons with a recent release that is also good but saying more gives away too much. Another one for the list of great pre-Star Wars 70s scifi flicks.

I only quoted the films I found the scores to be strange on. Whether you liked TFA or not, rating it lower than home alone 2 is crazy

FWIW, I think the non-Starkiller parts of TFA are worthy of a 8/10. But I really, really don’t like the Starkiller Base; I can’t forgive the movie for that so I give it a 7/10.

Fixed.

And before all the people who claim we bully people who didn’t like TFA I’m joking.

Handman said:

Possessed said:

Warbler said:

The 2nd one was a double post, I have deleted it.

You sure are alot of fun!

meow

Yeah so I don’t see what you’re getting at with the GIF then.

Also, it’s just a forum. Sometimes I think you need to remember that.

Warbler said:

The 2nd one was a double post, I have deleted it.

You sure are alot of fun!

I see you complaining about the content of other users posts, but I don’t see anything about a mod making a decision on things.

Mocata said:

Possessed said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

• Labyrinth (1986) – 9/10
• A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987) – 8/10
• Star Wars: Episode VII – The Force Awakens (2015) – 6/10
• Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) – 8/10
• Home Alone (1990) – 7/10
• Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) – 6.5/10
  Okay

Eh I would swap the score for Misery with Raiders and I’m not a big John Hughes fan, but you know I think this is mostly fair.

I watched Slaughterhouse-Five, it’s a cool concept with plenty of interesting ideas despite a few overly comedic bits. There are comparisons with a recent release that is also good but saying more gives away too much. Another one for the list of great pre-Star Wars 70s scifi flicks.

I only quoted the films I found the scores to be strange on. Whether you liked TFA or not, rating it lower than home alone 2 is crazy

Alderaan said:

darthrush said:

I’ll be seeing Beauty and the Beast tomorrow night and will leave a review here. Not crazy interested but the animated feature is quite charming so I’m mildly excited. I’m probably one of the only people on earth who wasn’t a huge fan of the live action Jungle book.

I’ve seen Beauty and the Beast live action and it was enjoyable to an extent but not as good as the original. I enjoy musicals if they are done well. The problem with this movie was that none of the actors are good singers. That’s a huge problem for a musical.

Exact opposite as you though, I haven’t seen the Jungle Book remake yet, but I actually want to because I heard they did an entirely different interpretation from the original.

I don’t know much about it, but if it’s based on the book rather than the first Disney movie I’m in. The book was much darker

moviefreakedmind said:

then he started being awful and mean-spirited.

How could you tell? Lol.

To be honest I agree. As long as it looks good I could give ashit less how “accurate” it is.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Would it be freakier to know that was only a small fraction of the cats I owned at the time that picture was taken?

That’s outrageous.

I mean it wouldn’t hurt, but it’s also probably not necessary. I’ve never heard of someone getting in trouble for downloading an edit. In fact I’ve never even heard of someone making an edit getting in trouble. A couple cease and desists but no trouble. You’re not going to be the first.

I never hated him or anything, but I can’t say I really miss random gibberish that barely qualified as English being posted in every thread.

Well from what I understand all the footage was filmed by a foreign (Japanese I think?) Company that went bankrupt and all the footage was bought by the American company and through narration retconned and edited into a movie. I believe the official story is that it’s the sane dog and cat filmed from birth over three years, but some people are claiming that they killed as many as 20 kittens filming some sections. I don’t want to believe it but I do have to admit watching the movie now there are definitely some questionable moments…

To get a nonanamorphic 4:3 sd transfer to look better than a1080p blu ray? Yeah that’d be a pretty bitchin laserdisc player

Im having a hard time believing that laserdiscs are going to look better than blu ray, even if those blu ray are flawed

Okay so what’s your guys take on the conspiracy theory that many cats and dogs were hurt and killed filming Milo and Otis? Personally I don’t see any reason not to believe the official story that it’s a single cat and dog for the whole film. But I’m open to a reasonable discussion

That’s a dangerous question to ask Duracell.

Not really. And spuffy isn’t really annoying anymore, he seems to have developed a sense of forum etiquette quite nicely and he no longer bothers me.