Possessed

I was asleep. I should still be asleep. Hopefully I’ll fall asleep. Otherwise I won’t get enough sleep.

Sleep.

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

So it’s a donut but without the goodness that makes a donut a donut? I’ll pass.

Bread is a donut but without the goodness that makes a donut and also without the roundness and hole-ness that makes a bagel, so you should pass on bread too.

But could you imagine a balogna donut though?

HEY.

dahmage said:

Possessed said:

So it’s a donut but without the goodness that makes a donut a donut? I’ll pass.

So are life preservers donuts to you? Is the letter O a donut? What about the Apple campus?.

All donuts.

So it’s a donut but without the goodness that makes a donut a donut? I’ll pass.

Then why would I just eat bread?

But see I don’t really care for sweets or pastries or anything like that. Regular glazed donuts are the farthest I’ll go.

I’ve never eaten a bagel.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

I guess the Jay/mods had enough of the bickering. But again I find it odd the thread of deleted instead of locked.

I believe it was the subject matter, not the bickering, that got it taken without word or warning. I know there is at least one person in the room walking around like a proud peacock even if we never know who it is. No-one was dragged in to the thread. Everyone had a choice to ignore or respond. If anyone chose to respond it was their own doing, they had something to say.

Oh well, so much for discussions that matter.

I think he was referring to you mentioning him being fond of calling people names even though what little he had said so far in the thread wasn’t directed at you, or mean spirited, but at this point it doesn’t matter.

Tsmuxer and imgburn can do it.

Surely there’s a timeline where George IS the doppleganger.

I quoted you with the intention of only quoting the part where you explained #2 but editing quotes is a pain in the ass on my phone so I just left it. But yeah I wasn’t talking to you. “It’s unknown” who I was talking about.

It was probably neglify.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Dek Rollins said:

Warbler said:

Well, you said I did the SAME THING when you were temp-banned that I did today. We both agree that today I posted a clapping gif to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. Therefore you must think that when I posted the clapping gif when you were temp banned, I must have been doing so to show agreement with a post of Darth Ender’s. So again I ask, which post of Darth Ender’s do you think I was agreeing with?

it was Ender’s “victim card” post.

Piss off Dek … I was perfectly clear.

You brought up the fact that he posted a gif when you were temp banned, and that seemed to be the biggest issue of confusion in the conversation. When Warb asked for further clarification because he wasn’t fully understanding your statements, you blew him of and didn’t answer the question. And no, I won’t piss off, because I was trying to clarify it simply for Warb when you apparently refused to do so.

He got you to think he was confused. He did post the Orson Welles applauding gif when I got temp-banned because he had already stated he was looking forward to it happening so him doing it in an innocent way was a no brainer and related to his Orson Welles applauding for rule#6 in the updated rules thread. Making innocent is just a loophole.

This gif was Shia LeBouf applauding because he agreed with enders post talking shit about me being a “victim”. Something else warbler has shown approval for. He knew I would get it but he again did it in a way that wouldn’t make it look as if he was “openly” breaking rule #6.

warbler got sloppy with his little modus operandi so I said something. Making himself again looking innocent by saying he doesn’t understand … he’s not as innocent and his posting around the forum shows he’s more knowledgeable than he’s saying he is now.

It’s the last I’m saying on the matter. I hate that I let myself get bent about this stuff but finding ways to circumvent the rules innocently is still breaking the rules. I’m not trying to be a jerk to you Dek, I’m just ticked off that this shit never stops and most everyone is okay with it.

1. I posted the gif when rule 6 was announced because I was agreeing with it and nothing more, it had nothing do with looking forward to seeing you get banned.

2. I posted the gif when you got temp-banned, “for something or another”. If you can prove I was doing because you got temp-banned, prove it.

3. I posted the gif today because I agreed with Ender’s post.

4. None of the three above had anything to do with each other, except they happen to include a clapping gif. They were not part of deep plot or conspiracy to “get you”. n

5. You are completely crazy and deluded.

6. Take your persecution and victim complexes and your conspiracy theories and your tin foil hat and shove them up your ass.

I’ll admit that I sure was glad when you were banned, no bones about it. I hope it happens again too. The sad thing is I’m sure you’re a nice guy but your presence on this forum is a constant irritation. Every time I start to think you’re getting easier to tolerate you stay up with the bullshit again.

Jetrell Fo said:
I’m just ticked off that this shit never stops and most everyone is okay with it.

Yeah that’s how most people here feel about your posts, just replace “everyone is okay with it” with “everyone is annoyed to shit by it but it doesn’t technically break any rules so we have to suffer through it while you try your best to suck the fun out of the forum”.

Of all the threads to ask that question…

No dek it’s okay, rule #6 only applies to Fo remember?

Just fuming about it because I was just reminded of it while doing my edit and having to take the time to replace footage from another source just for this. I’m sure it’s been talked about already but…

The cgi Doug in jabbas palace. JUST. FUCKING. WHY. It’s not that it technically looks bad it’s just the timing (oh everybody’s sleeping… Except this guy!). If they wanted to add him to a different shot that had other (awake) creatures I wouldn’t have really cared… But I would still wonder why.

Everywhere, you are obviously just antagonizing Fo to further cement his status as the shit stain of the forum (or whatever his latest self deprecating “joke” was), remember?

Jetrell Fo said:

Possessed said:

Jetrell Fo said:

He was probably more interested in taking another “victim” shot which he is becoming known for instead of actually reading it first.

Lmao, no, the text that he was talking about is genuinely unintelligible due to the low resolution.

But the fact that you think that proves that he would have been right.

This is not the first time him or you have said such things so there is no proof needed for that.

I believe, had he taken the time (which maybe he didn’t have when he posted it) to read the small print on the bottom right, he would not have posted that specific one.

Pretty simple observation, yes?

Unless he also agrees about those groups often playing the card and was subscribing to the theory that it was put there as sarcasm?

TV’s Frink said:

Possessed said:

I’m 99% sure I agree.

Which if I’ve done my math correctly, means you are roughly 98% sure that _ender didn’t post the Victim Card image for the small print.

Correct. I never put anything past anybody.

Jetrell Fo said:

He was probably more interested in taking another “victim” shot which he is becoming known for instead of actually reading it first.

Lmao, no, the text that he was talking about is genuinely unintelligible due to the low resolution.

But the fact that you think that proves that he would have been right.

I’m 99% sure I agree.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

huh?

That is the small print on the bottom right of the card, you said you couldn’t read the small print, I typed it out so you could.

That’s not the print he said he couldn’t read. He said he couldn’t read the bottom in the middle.

I can’t either though.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

btw, can anyone tell me what the fine print under the “(your name)” says? I can’t seem to read it.

DOES NOT APPLY TO: Whites, Cis-Gendered, Heterosexuals, or Christians.

Makes your “I wasn’t talking about you Fo” clapping post reference look pretty stupid now doesn’t it?

Seems Ender was off his game too because it’s kind of inflammatory.

😉

That’s not the part he was asking about.

Whether or not pretending he wasn’t clapping in reference to this being directed at you is another thing though and I’m not getting into it.

I doubt that they would even consider that fans would care what sources they used.