- Post
- #1507495
- Topic
- LOTR: The Rings of Power Spoiler Thread
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1507495/action/topic#1507495
- Time
I’ve never had much interest in ‘purist’ edits of Tolkien, mainly because I believe adaptations are sometimes strongest when they deviate from source material, and there’s often a good reason for the deviance. In fact, since adaptations are entirely different mediums it’s really hard to compare them at all. For example, you bring up plated armor in the movies and show, but it’s notable that this is a visual detail which is the primary mode of conveying the story in visual media. And while Tolkien did often describe what characters were wearing in the story, he was a linguist first and foremost and this carries into the storytelling. The tale is felt through the names of the characters, their way of speaking, their poems and songs. The word choice of the stories themselves tends heavily toward words derived from Old English roots rather than Latinate words and phrases. This gives everything in the books the feeling of entering another world, an older world of myth and legend.
All this is to say that although the Jackson LOTR movies come close, nothing can really evoke Tolkien’s writing after it has been warped and transmuted onto a screen. It’s the same sort of thing that happened to the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy show and movie. It’s the author’s writing style more than anything else that makes the work special, which only really comes through in the books and radio dramas.
Oh, and the latest episode was fine. It felt a bit weightless considering the magnitude of events, that is all.