logo Sign In

NFBisms

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Jun-2015
Last activity
1-Apr-2025
Posts
636

Post History

Post
#1600685
Topic
What Do YOU Think Star Wars Should Do Next?
Time

If I had to be earnest, I think Andor is the best Star Wars media probably ever produced? It’s perfect. So I will always be grateful for that.

But I think weirdly enough, Andor more than anything is what has allowed me to feel at peace with Star Wars? Like, I can put it to bed now. When I joke about ending it all, it’s coming from a real place of love and satisfaction. Not trying to be cynical.

The middling/bad nature of the prequels - and to a lesser extent, the sequels - has always left Star Wars an unresolved question in my mind. There’s potential here, I’d always imagined it, and I’ve always been looking for it - in books, in comics, in cartoons, the shows. I developed so much understanding of the universe along the way, to speculate about it like it was real, find interesting conceits to explore. I’ve never been fully satisfied with any one thing, and it only got harder as I got older, as I branched out and became a fan of other things.

But I always saved a place in my heart for Star Wars. So when the perfect cross section of where I am now as a film fan, and all this “language” I’ve honed over the years as a nerd came out - it was, idk, meaningful to me. I could “grow up” now, move on. Gilroy took every nerdy way I’ve thought about the Star Wars galaxy and put it into something I could genuinely enjoy as an adult. So removed from the canon being built on the other side of the franchise, so singular in its refraction of the OT story I already loved. And it was a Gilroy project through and through! As a big Michael Clayton-head, I couldn’t be more pleased.

I only came to this realization after not really feeling the subsequent releases (Mando, Ahsoka, Acolyte), but also not really feeling any kind of desire to “fix” them like I would. I wasn’t even disappointed. They just weren’t for me.

So Andor really changed the franchise for me, from an investment in its world and timeline, to a complete series of films I adore, a TV show that I love. I’ve gotten what I’ve always wanted from this whole thing and those movies aren’t going anywhere. And I think ultimately, even if it’s not Andor for you, that’s the end of the line for everyone at some point.

Post
#1600155
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

Vladius said:

Acbagel said:

  1. The Culmination of the Jedi Cover-up - This whole show has painted Vernestra as some sort of independent agent with the Order, able to unilaterally make decisions and act without any oversight. Her entire role here continually prompted my brain to ask “How is she allowed to do this?” and “Why is no one else getting involved?” The way this played out with her ability to constantly put together “secret” teams of 6-12-man Jedi squads and deploy them across the galaxy without Council oversight significantly undermined the established hierarchy of the Jedi Order. Then the episode’s conclusion, Vern convenes a meeting with the Supreme Chancellor and several Senate members, during which she fabricates a story implicating Sol. The blatant lie is presented without any pushback or skepticism from other knowledgeable Jedi or senate members, even though it’s been presented as if this knowledge is not at all secretive. Many seem to have an understanding of what happened, yet this beyond-out-of-the-blue explanation goes through this committee without challenge, and also somehow through Yoda. The episode further suggests that many Jedi are either complicit in or oblivious to this deception. This scenario assumes a level of collective ignorance or compliance that is difficult to reconcile with the established character and vigilance of the Jedi Order in this time period. The notion that the Council would not make it the #1 priority to investigate and verify the causes of the deaths of about a dozen Jedi, especially when linked to such a significant cover-up, strained all plausibility. Given the interconnected nature of the Jedi community, it is just inconceivable that such significant events would go unnoticed or unexamined. The deaths of multiple Jedi would inevitably become a major topic of concern for hundreds if not thousands of Jedi who interacted with so many of these fallen brothers and sisters, especially since we’re talking about murders of both Masters and Younglings… This episode outright asks us viewers to accept the reality that no other Jedi, many of whom would logically be aware of at least some of the true events, would speak out against Vern’s falsehoods. Sol is supposedly the killer, and when it is talked about, you’re telling me no one would be like, “Hey, uh… wasn’t Sol actually here on Coruscant in this very temple when Indara was killed a few days ago…?” “Hasn’t he been training the Younglings right here in this room?” “Yeah, he was showing me how to meditate at noon 3 days ago during the murder! Someone go check the schedule and the cameras!” Not to mention, didn’t we have multiple witnesses that IDed Mae, who is also now in custody at the temple? How does the Council not seem to care about any of this mountain of evidence? How are Jedi being killed en masse and they’re turning a blind eye to all of it? How does Grandmaster Yoda not sense any of this and deploy the most prominent Jedi Masters to investigate? He sensed Anakin killing Tusken Raiders across the galaxy, yet he can’t sense the massive conspiracy of murders happening right under his nose? This is not even a time when the Dark Side is “clouding” the vision of the Jedi. Sidious was responsible for that and Yoda is seeing these visions through that cloud, THAT’S what we’re supposed to see as Yoda struggling, but here he looks like a complete chump having no control over the Order. I don’t even understand what Vern feels like she needs to cover up? Is she hiding ALL of the truth simply because she still cares about… Qimir? Her former apprentice, apparently, as that was suddenly revealed (but extremely obvious, like every other “reveal” in this show). I genuinely don’t understand what is wrong with the truth here. Implicating Sol as a fallen Jedi seems WAY worse than just about any other explanation. Here is a short list of everyone who can easily give first-hand eyewitness accounts that directly contradict this lie:

Tasi Lowa, Yord’s Apprentice who was investigating Indara’s killer in episode 1. She investigated the initial murder scene and interviewed eyewitnesses of Mae’s attack on Indara. Every single piece of evidence pointed to Osha/Mae, nothing could’ve possibly indicated Sol. Can you imagine how bewildered she would be to hear this news? Surely she’d think something was amuck?

The bar owner from episode 1 who positively ID’ed one of the twins and dozens of other bar patrons who saw Mae walk up to Indara and threaten her in a combat stance.

The entire outpost of Jedi on Olega who are WITH Sol the entire time when Torbin is discovered to be dead.

Eyewitnesses on Olega like the young girl who was bribed to let Mae into the Jedi outpost.

Ki-Adi-Mundi and everyone in the room during that scene who watches footage of Mae ATTACKING Sol. Did Vern delete this footage…? Even assuming so, isn’t that MORE suspicious since multiple Jedi would testify to the exact same thing? Sol was not using a single act of aggression against Mae. CLEARLY, she was the aggressor trying to kill him. Like what possible explanation is there to point to Sol as a deranged fallen murderer according to the dozens to hundreds of pieces of evidence from Olega? And if the cover-up is that Sol used Mae to murder the Jedi, that’s even more unbelievable because everyone in this show has commented about how she’s not that strong and looks slow, she’s way outclassed by Sol without a weapon on camera, yet we’re supposed to believe she has murdered 3-4 masters and an entire squad of elite Knights in lightsaber combat. No.

Bazil. He is friendly with the Jedi and saw EVERYTHING. There is no way he’d defend Vern here.

Everyone on the Brendok Jedi team that saw how Sol didn’t have any self-inflicted wounds, and then suddenly Sol’s body is gone and didn’t return to Coruscant so they’re unable to perform an autopsy. Did this group of 11 other Jedi not discuss amongst themselves like “Hey, did you move Sol’s body?” “No… Did you?” “No…” everyone glares suspiciously at Vernestra

Any Jedi who arrested and processed Mae. Since apparently, they believed she murdered Sol, they told her as much, and then Vernestra waited until she was on Coruscant to make up this lie.

Every Jedi in the Temple who can confirm Sol’s whereabouts at the time of all these murders. Folks, this is not like Sol is within a 30-minute drive and could sneak out, kill a master, and make it back to Youngling Class in time (though this show does indicate starships can enter orbit and teleport across the galaxy in mere seconds). The accusation is that he was stealing starships, or has some unregistered personal starship, flying across the galaxy, killing Indara, sneaking around Olega and being involved in tons of other events and killing Torbin, sneaking to Khofar and killing half a dozen Jedi and Kelnacca, then flying to Brendock to kill himself. Sol. SOL. The softest, sweetest teacher… COME ON.

Of course, Vern knows the actual killers of Osha/Qimir could easily present evidence and wreck her entire scheme if desired. And we’re supposed to believe Yoda looks at all of this, gives Vern a thumbs up, and moves on.

Any way that I try to understand this cover-up, I cannot begin to fathom how it’s believed by even a single member of the Council, let alone the entire Order and Senate. Sorry, but you are required to suspend reality and sensible writing in order to accept this cover-up plot device. It makes absolutely no sense in-universe. It’s a good idea for a story on paper, but the idea itself was not fleshed out in any sensible way.

  1. Sol’s Guilt - Poor Sol. Read my earlier reviews and you’ll see that he was a character I actually liked for much of this show until they turned him into an absolute idiot here in the end. He confesses to Osha that he murdered her mother without trying to explain why he did what he did. I thought he had indisputable probable cause so this entire arc has never resonated with me. Mother Aniseya, a dark side using witch, was turning into a demon-looking monster with sharp teeth, dissolving a child who he thought was Osha (who wanted to be freed from this world), there was mention of the fire, and thus Sol was trying to protect Osha, as well as himself and Torbin who had been previously violently attacked. So let’s say even if Sol would 99% be justified for his actions in a court of law, even in a Senate tribunal outside the Jedi Council, let’s just say he still carries some guilt from that night because, yeah, I guess it would be traumatic (though the events here do not seem that much greater than any ordinary Jedi mission where death occurs. These guys train their entire lives for situations exactly like this and have presumably seen worse already as a Jedi Master). So he has been wanting to tell Osha the truth and he’s been wanting to explain himself to Mae for 16 years. So here he finally gets the chance to talk to his beloved Osha, the closest thing he will ever have to a daughter, and out of nowhere she just murders him by force choke without even wanting any kind of explanation about why he confessed to killing her mother. The man she has looked up to as a father figure for years upon years for most of her life. And Sol, being an idiot, lets her kill him, lets her fall to the dark side, and ruin the rest of her life by walking away with a child-killer. Even if you want to say it’s “loving” in some twisted way for Sol to just let Osha “be herself” or something, Sol watched Qimir butcher a squad of Jedi like a day or two ago. He watched him gut Jecki, a child. Does he not care enough for Osha to stop her from being seduced to the dark side by a deranged mass murderer? I get that Leslye wanted to tell his story to show “flaws” in the Jedi or something like that (and see the KOTOR comic line if you want an actually fantastic deployment of such an idea), but like above, the idea looks like an idea on paper and not one that makes sense as a sequence of events in a very interconnected plot. Sol’s entire character arc was a massive letdown

I’m sure you know this already but the answer you’re going to get will always be
*The prequel Jedi (possibly all Jedi) are bad and were always corrupt and the real villains
OR the lite version, *The Jedi were “flawed” so it makes sense that they’re “flawed”
*“Watch the prequels” “Watch The Clone Wars” “Watch Tales of the Jedi”

I really don’t want to get into politics here but Osha and Mae’s mom basically unalived herself by cop. You’re supposed to think Sol is in the wrong because she was “unarmed”. He’s like a cop thinking someone has a gun when they reach into a glove compartment and really they have a hairbrush or something, and shooting first and asking questions later. Like you said that’s not the situation at all because they were already attacking the Jedi and she was literally transforming into a shadow demon and starting to evaporate a child, but I’m pretty sure that’s the idea and it worked on much of the target audience for the show.

On the contrary (and I know this won’t move the needle for you), something I actually kind of appreciated here was the effort this went to show the Jedi not as space cops. I think that angle gets overplayed a bit; it’s easy to villainize them in that lens, but that’s hardly the point. This has a more productive distillation of the subtext.

The group on Brendok was doing botanical/geological surveys. They are scientists and researchers, practitioners in the Force. Not knights-errant, or even diplomatic peacekeepers. (This is what Torbin is lonely and frustrated about!) Even around the temples, we see these very particular Terry Gilliam-character, nerdy British guys as Jedi. Vernestra herself isn’t comfortable with hyperspace and being out there in the field. The show articulates that in this era, they are wont to be academics. They aren’t even tied closely to the Senate yet!

Just wanted to put out there that I think it’s very different from the prequel Jedi flaws. It explains how we get there, but I think Sol’s mistakes here are more as a man of faith, not a cop. He thinks he’s hearing the Force, but he’s really feeling his own fears and desires. Personal paternal instincts, filtered into something external he needs to answer to. He doesn’t realize he is driving the action, not just following the whims of nature.

I end up liking this because I think the prequel’s cop thing ends up muddling what is actually kind of wrong with the Jedi pedagogy and how institution exerts pressures. The cop thing has always been something unique to the Clone War era and context, but there is something more real and timeless about organization and positing a “correct” side of the Force here. Sol is just unfamiliar with other ways of interfacing with the Force - the Jedi way tells us everything else is a corruption - and to be fair it does look bad.

This all feels really nuanced, because Indara is a good example of a master working within the guidelines. She is able to step outside their beliefs and tell Sol that the markings could just be a cultural thing, not necessarily an abomination in the Force. She explicitly tells Sol that Torbin needs to make his own mistakes and gives him the space to do so. Indara wants to leave everyone be. And I think if Sol isn’t there, this doesn’t go bad. But he fails as a Jedi more than because he is one. It’s important that the Jedi are human and that’s okay, what is bad is the need to cover it up to not rock the boat, to minimize mess. The organizational pressure that pushes these human characters to lie.

i wish the show was good

Post
#1599736
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

The reversion-back-to-“good” is a central tension to the read I’m putting forward here. To tie it back to the OT Vader discussion, in this perspective it’s a performance. Not even necessarily a mask on his true self, but a desperate grasp on to his better self. Gradual or abrupt, linear or nonlinear - is beside my point, I think it’s just supposed to be a struggle. And I do think that has interplay with ROTJ’s portrayal of Vader’s redemption. It’s playing with the question of ontological good/evil. Can someone fundamentally be “just” a psychotic killer? [is it] too late for me son

He wants to believe he has the morals not to kill Dooku, he buries the memory of the Tuskens because that’s not what a good Jedi [master] does. I think the amount of time spent in ROTS of him angsting about his responsibilities vs desires makes it relatively intuitive that he is performing, deferring to doctrine and procedure harder than ever before. (“Not the Jedi way” “against the Jedi code” “never been done in the history of the Jedi”) Compensating for his failure and disappointment in himself into rigidity

This especially when that’s not how he was characterized in AOTC. It’s basically Catholic guilt, sin motivating piety. The Tuskens being evoked early in ROTS as a response to Anakin’s performed morals is functional in that lens.

I do think you’re right about the weirdness of Padme being super cool with the massacre in AOTC, though.

The other things that muddle it is stuff like the Padme death anxiety simply making no sense, and yet being given central focus. The fascism that peeks out also generally just makes Anakin unsympathetic. It’s odd because these explain motivations for different parts of his arc - but they barely if at all synthesize with one another.

  1. Padme is cool with Anakin killing those Tuskens because they need to be in love
  2. The nightmares of Padme’s death motivate the deal with the devil
  3. Anakin’s failed search for absolution explains the upfront costs
  4. The fascist side of Anakin gives him something to stay around for when it all goes bad

It’s all a mess BUT i think can be kinda compelling to think through

Post
#1599353
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

I’m someone who didn’t like the show up to this point, but I think the finale did kind of save it for me? I at least really admire what it was trying to do; I think the unsettling nature of the whole story kind of came together in the end. It did feel “evil” to me, the payoff of Osha being the one to strangle Sol to death in Jonestown just feels dark and appropriately uncomfortable, even if it wasn’t fully earned.

But yeah, it’s very weird and bad throughout, Osha and Mae never really work as characters, but I’m sold enough on this as the relatively mundane start of a secret rotting that informs the whole saga. It’s intimate with big implications, deceptively fucked up. I think that feeling it leaves me with is generally just a fun impression. I had fun with a trashy show.

Post
#1599265
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

Channel72 said:

NFBisms said:

When he chooses Palpatine, he’s making a deal with the devil to “save Padme’s life”, liberating himself from the [Jedi-informed] conscience he did have. It’s not that what he does from here “doesn’t count” but it’s not a reflection of who he is (well, idk, loaded philosophical question) or who he wants to be. Hayden crying is some of the most striking imagery in ROTS and it happens several times.

I think the problem with Anakin’s decision to follow Palpatine is the absurdly extreme cost of doing so that Anakin has to pay right up front. I mean, I can understand Anakin (or anybody, really) agreeing to do some seriously evil stuff in order to save the life of a loved one. But Anakin is told that, in order to save Padme, he has to basically mass-murder everyone he’s ever known, including children. That goes well beyond “my first Dark Side experience”. The justification, I guess, is that Anakin desperately wants to save Padme and he’s slightly pissed off at the Jedi for denying him a Council seat. But this is so weak - the character-work really isn’t there in the script to justify Anakin’s decision. It’s a ridiculous and jarring leap to go from “well I’m now an accessory to Mace Windu’s murder, I might as well just roll with the whole Dark Side thing” to “I will now methodically murder hundreds of people including defenseless children on the off-chance this Sith stuff pans out and saves Padme”.

I think it’s important that those upfront costs aren’t his First Dark Side Experience™. It’s still the Tuskens.

What I’m positing is that the guilt and self-hatred of that has permanence, informs his internality, even by the time of ROTS. When he bows to Palpatine, he can agree to the terms because he’s already spent the past three years haunted by what he’s done, already knowing well the shape of evil inside him. It’s what he’s been running away from, to reputation as a hero (a good man), and what he hopes is masterhood (vindication as a Jedi).

In the face of the Jedi’s persistent doubt and rejection, that protective self-image crumbles and he is left to confront the darker projections - the guilt, the secrets, like the wife he’s hiding, who he cares about most in this moment. Who has he been fooling? As a Jedi, he’s already failed.

So this all has more to do with himself than it does the Jedi Order’s faults to him, or even the politics of the situation. Anakin is lacking in the tools to actualize as anything more than the monster he’s feared himself to be, who Yoda always warns him he’d become. He’s fulfilling his own internalized hatred, and that started with the Tuskens. imo

(sorry btw, i don’t mean to be a prequel apologist, i also am disappointed with these movies, i just end up here when i have to think about it)

Post
#1598872
Topic
What do you think of The Prequel Trilogy? A general discussion.
Time

A perspective that can kind of make it all work for me is that Anakin does this stuff and hates himself for it.

We do see him struggle with guilt over the sand people (albeit in a badly written, painful-to-watch scene), so it’s in the text. But what’s crucial is that he wants to be a good Jedi and hero, that he knows what his responsibilities are, what’s expected of him. He isn’t overtly sociopathic - he cries about having done these monstrous things, and even in ROTS, just about his unbecoming feelings.

I think the evil he ends up doing - while contradictory to - can still inform, the colder more balanced Vader we get in the OT.

Anakin throughout the first half of ROTS defends the Jedi council and their doctrine to Palpatine; looks to it first, to Yoda, when having a crisis of faith. He performs The Hero, and his relationship with Obi-Wan is great: brothers with someone who thinks him to have grown wise, a good friend worthy yet to be a master. There is something re: his ambition for power there, but I think importantly with the context of his original sin (the Tusken massacre), a question also of absolution. And he clings to all of it. He yearns to be validated by the Order and find in himself that “hero” (to his 9 y/o self’s eyes) - up until it’s clear they would never let him in. Not because Mace doesn’t take him seriously, but because of what Anakin comes to accept about what he’s hiding.

When he chooses Palpatine, he’s making a deal with the devil to “save Padme’s life”, liberating himself from the [Jedi-informed] conscience he did have. It’s not that what he does from here “doesn’t count” but it’s not a reflection of who he is (well, idk, loaded philosophical question) or who he wants to be. Hayden crying is some of the most striking imagery in ROTS and it happens several times.

I think after burning down all that has caused him strife - good and bad - more than just an empty shell, is the motivation to meaningful affect control on his world. It is kind of a reset into the dignified agent of justice he wanted to be as a Jedi, just without the guardrails. And once again performing that role in cover and self-loathing of what more he’s done.

Post
#1594839
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

Channel72 said:

This episode fully leans in to what was implied about the Jedi in the Prequels: they go around imposing their will on the Galaxy like the Spanish Inquisition, snatching away Force-sensitive children essentially at gunpoint. The Coven acted like they had no choice in the matter, and instead tried to trick the Jedi into leaving. Nice “Guardians of Peace and Justice”. They’re more like the Galactic Gestapo.

I never liked how the Prequels portrayed the Jedi and this show really leans into that portrayal. Ahh well, it is what it is.

I’m someone who actually loves how the prequel Jedi were portrayed, but it worked far better for me as emergent background. Here, in making a point, the whole concept becomes less enticing. Particularly because it feels like the witches were intentionally designed and written to generate friction, already starting from an oppositional perspective, rather than letting the Jedi flaws come out in organic praxis.

It’s fun to see the pursuit of selfless detachment trip into selfish moral vanity, how faith in the metaphysical can lead to inaction and neglect, how pragmatism = paternalism, how responsibility becomes authority, how peace can lack justice. These are all cool themes - that “The Jedi kidnaps children” can absolutely be a symptom of - but feels forced as a character’s primary vendetta. It leans too far into the Jedi as stickler for nonsense rules, and not Jedi as an insitution worth dissecting. And especially when the alternative, opposing way of life is so vaguely defined - what are we supposed to be getting out of this?

I think if anything - if we really are doing the Rashomon thing - this should have just leaned into portraying the Jedi as Osha’s liberators, and then show her family as loving in the recontextualization. Not this odd middle ground.

Also, I don’t think this episode was that redundant. I mean, all we knew before was that Osha’s family died in some fire and Mae seemed to blame the Jedi. I didn’t necessarily expect that Mae herself started the fire. But I do agree that the first two episodes shouldn’t have revealed so much information, especially since so much of it was revealed in rather clunky expository dialogue. Like at one point one of the Jedi actually tells Osha something like “your entire family was killed, etc.”. Pretty clunky, and completely redundant since we see these events play out in Episode 3 anyway.

Mae was actually said to have started the fire first thing when Sol explained what happened to Osha’s family. It’s later the point of Osha staying behind when Sol confronts Mae at the end of episode 2, Sol can sense that Osha still feels angry at Mae for killing their family.

I feel the opposite about how they should have handled it though. I wouldn’t have minded leaving this all to the exposition until a more complete revelation later. It was already pretty efficient. Maybe have some short cutaways like when Maarva was talking about Clem in Andor, but a whole episode? idk. Perhaps this could have even been intercut with the present day plot if they were so dead set on it. I think my biggest issue is how much of the pace it slowed down for very little returns.

Post
#1594791
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

I think what made it especially frustrating was that this was all more or less what the exposition detailed in the premiere episodes. Nothing particularly interesting about the coven or the twins or the Jedi was revealed, they could have snuck some of these details into the first two.

Just kinda feels like a waste of an episode - even though I’m 100% sure we’re going to get a Rashomon-esque revisit of these events down the line.

Post
#1594232
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

BedeHistory731 said:

NFBisms said:

sad that anyone agrees with Anjohan, it’s just empty rhetoric

Yeah, but I find it pointless to try and change minds here (outside of purely technically discussions).

Fair, just wanted to stake a claim that the post at the top of this page doesn’t represent the community. I like it here a lot because it’s full of smart, thoughtful people, not the kind of stuff being peddled above. It’s like you said, this niche corner of the fanbase has always been a bright spot, we don’t need the outside culture war to plant a flag here.


Anyway, back to The Acolyte. Even if it’s pretty mediocre at the moment, I am interested to see if it will have more interesting things to do as it goes on.

Kogonada is directing the next episode, which is a very compelling choice to me; Columbus is one of my favorite films. I’m interested to see if any of his sensuous photographical style will translate on production design this overtly “loud”, if he was even able to imbue this with any of his own sensibilities. It seems to be primarily a flashback episode based on stills released on the official site.

Which also made me realize that Torbin looked so weird to me because he wasn’t actually an old man! That was Tommen from Game of Thrones lol. He’s probably going to play a big part in the flashbacks if he was cast, which also means it wasn’t a complete waste of Carrie-Ann Moss. The flashback timeline is probably pretty expansive.

Post
#1594119
Topic
<em><strong>ANDOR</strong></em> - Disney+ Series - A General Discussion Thread
Time

We have writer-arc pairs for S2 on the updated WGA directory.

Tom Bissell is a really interesting choice for the last arc, he’s mostly known for his video game stuff, but his career has largely been in nonfiction as a political journalist and critic, much of his work based around the Soviet Union and the legacy of communism.

The first season was already freighted with historical allegory and sociopolitical themes, but now there’s real researched weight behind season 2, which is so cool. I imagine as we go further into the revolution, this subject matter becomes more pertinent.

Gilroy has also said Bissell was brought in as the Star Wars fan of the staff; that synthesis should actually be kind of perfect for the finale arc overlapping with Star Wars™ proper.

Outside of the obvious stuff his background would bring (political history, Star Wars nerddom), he wrote a book, Apostle: Travels Among the Tombs of the Twelve - a spiritual/academic investigation on the early schisms of Christianity and the historical context of the Bible’s authors. For a show like Andor, it sounds like the perfect framework for developing the Force’s role in the Rebellion, similarly to how I speculated it would eventually factor in a few pages back. I’ve already picked up a copy and am excited to read it lol. hopefully some of this helps inform s2

Tangentially, in the first season, Gilroy mentioned Simon Seabag Montefiore’s Young Stalin as inspiration particularly for the heist and Cassian himself, and I did end up reading that as well. Really interesting book too! There’s a lot of insight in these sources and the writers’ previous work towards what exactly the show is doing, if anyone else was interested in that sort of thing. It only makes the show more satisfying.

Post
#1593941
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

^^goes to show anyone successfully baited into being mad is just a loser

RogueLeader said:
It’s possible this whole assassination plot is going against the wishes of the Master Sith, who I’m assuming we actually haven’t seen yet. But, I wonder if the Sith are manipulating Mae to kill these Jedi in order to begin chipping away at the facade of the Jedi Order. I think the ‘dream’ speaks to the way the galaxy views the Jedi, and how the Jedi view themselves. I think it will be revealed that the Jedi hold some responsibility for what happened on the twins’ home planet, and if the public finds out about it it would be a scandal. I think the Sith may be trying to slowly sour public sentiment of the Jedi. And on the other side of things, perhaps they know this scandal will lead the Jedi to become more dogmatic like we see them in prequels, and even more tied with Coruscant and the Senate.

I also get a sense that this philosophy has involved into an actual tradition that Sith have for their acolytes. We’ve seen Mae/evil twin reach for her target’s lightsaber during their fights, and her targets have commented on her fighting them without a weapon. It seems like Mae having to resort to her blades or poison is something she’s reluctant to do. She told Qimir she is going to kill a Jedi without a weapon to please the Master, but I wonder if in order for an acolyte to earn their lightsaber (and/or officially become a Sith apprentice), they have to kill a Jedi with their own weapon. And that weapon becomes their red lightsaber.

It is a little confusing where Mae’s orders and her own vendetta begin and end, but I think this is right-on - if not close - to what’s going on. Qimir and Mae’s conversations alluding to her killing at least one of the four masters without a weapon (and the poison counts), could just be them misunderstanding the aphorism. But clarity on it is probably going to come in hand with the revelations of what happened on Brendok - if it’s bad enough Torbin literally kills himself over the guilt.

Does feel a little like the broad strokes of the payoffs are already telegraphed, especially when the inevitable endpoint is that this all gets buried (or just doesn’t ever resolve in a meaningful way) - which makes me hopeful there is more to it than just scandal. These episodes are scattered with 5 minute mysteries (the twin, the poison, etc) that ultimately don’t matter, it’s hard to tell if that’s just weird writing or by design. I think we’ll get a better feel for what it is as we go along, but because it’s so early in the show there’s room for it to be the latter. Actually interested to see how these checks pay off.

I theorize they’re doing an earnest try at a Darth Jar Jar thing with Qimir, but that’s neither here nor there to the core mystery

Post
#1593879
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

It’s not amazing or anything, but it’s very watchable IMO! I like the characters so far and am on its wavelength re: the Jedi. There are decent hooks here. The production is perhaps not as up to snuff as what we’ve seen before - we’re firmly in television ass television - but that’s no bad thing tbh, that’s literally what this is. It’s still colorful and charming all things considered.

I like it. I’m not as compelled to watch week to week, but I’ll definitely wrap around when the season is over.

Post
#1591591
Topic
<em><strong>ANDOR</strong></em> - Disney+ Series - A General Discussion Thread
Time

Yeah but it was the wealthy corporate alliance who had the droid armies. That meant something inside the prequels themselves, but importantly and especially feel like it means something in a show like Andor. Droids are purpose-built and have personhood in Star Wars to the point that it’s plausible to me that flexible human labor ends up cheaper.

Either way, it’s probably a Why Not? thing more than it is a real calculation. It’s not like we don’t have prison labor in our own world. the empire is evil, they’re trying to get as much out of everyone as possible

Post
#1591563
Topic
<em><strong>ANDOR</strong></em> - Disney+ Series - A General Discussion Thread
Time

Well, the show pointedly says that they (humans) are “cheaper than droids and easier to replace.” It sets that state of play up very specifically. Even in real life multiple tasks one human guy could turn around, need multiple machines for the different tasks.

Slavery eliminates the cost of building droids in the first place, and in Star Wars those droids would basically be humans that need more maintenance than the nutri-sludge (oil changes, repairs, etc) anyway.

RE: the transfer scam, I think it was just feeding into the idea that the Empire is too arrogant. It’s not a scam they’ve been running, it came with the P.O.R.D. and no one thought it through to its inevitabilities.

Post
#1588764
Topic
Tales of the Empire
Time

Honestly such a waste - bare bones Cliffnotes scripts really let down the concepts, there’s nothing here the trailer didn’t already substantiate in a minute of montage editing.

And sure, it’s often felt like intentional withholding of interesting stuff in these animated shows, but this one uniquely bulldozes through the concepts it puts on the table. This was supposed to be answers and payoffs. Bariss’ speculative future was so exciting and compelling in imagination, that’s gone now.

Post
#1582885
Topic
<strong>The Acolyte</strong> (live action series set in The High Republic era) - a general discussion thread
Time

Andor excluded of course, it’s so 70s right down to formally being the grimy thrillers Star Wars '77 would be analyzed as cultural antidote to. The writing is timeless, the mullets and moustaches, even the Niamos beachwear feel so in line with ANH’s time period. And don’t forget the junky analog tech! Machines are big and unwieldy; Dedra has to do what’s basically an archive search by asking an attendant to collect those files from giant tube computers. There are illegible glass interfaces of lines ala Yavin and Hoth, tons of tactile knobs and switches and buttons, etc. Modified AK-47s as the symbolic weapon of revolution circa the 70s is loaded imagery, just like the modified StGs and Mausers in the OT evoke WWII. I was hyped as hell when Cassian was sentenced to prison by a 70s credit card machine.

And it makes it thematic. Nemik has a whole right-to-repair bit about technology being lost or forgotten; one of the many ways Empire imposes its will is through centralized uniform technology, moving populace away from the different lines of communication and information they maybe once had access to. Seperatist projects like tactical droids with databases in their head, Techno Union touch screens, or Umbaran bubble fighters fall by the wayside in distinctly important ways. It’s great!

Stuff like that really puts us right back into the space A New Hope is in. Whereas, yeah, it feels like a lot of other Star Wars stuff recently just conceptualizes “Star Wars” as anything that’s been in the movies before. Fair game for inclusion at any point, regardless of its faux-historical context. Aside from looking like a very modern Disney+ show in lighting and costuming, I wouldn’t be surprised if there isn’t any real technological difference between High Republic and Mandalorian eras in Acolyte. I would have loved design that feels more historical than just “cool” for the characters.