logo Sign In

Moth3r

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Oct-2004
Last activity
16-Jul-2017
Posts
4,892

Post History

Post
#371165
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time
dlbsyst said:
adywan said:

yes his is better. I would have assumed that all the laserdisc pressings were the same, which is why i didn't bother to see if i could borrow his in the first place. We both purchased our copies off ebay. There is another difference too. On his he has a dolby digital video before the movie starts whereas mine goes from the fox opening directly to the movie. No dolby digital vid at all. very strange indeed

But the sound is so much better than my disc and now at least i won't have to work with all the filters in vegas to try and eliminate the DRC from the original recording.

 

WOW. It sounds like yours is a bootleg. I didn't even know they existed.

This is a fascinating discovery.

Bootleg laserdiscs did exist, but they were extremely rare. I've heard of unauthorized releases of Titanic, Jurassic Park and Lady and the Tramp that were available in Singapore or China, but I've never heard of the existence of a bootleg LD of TPM.

Ady did you check the mint marks? The official disc should be manufactured by Pioneer Japan.

Post
#370972
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time
dlbsyst said:

...

I can hear massive amounts of dynamic compression going on in this mix especially in the loud parts. It sounds to me like the soft parts have been brought up and the loud parts have been brought down. E

...

Is it possible something slipped in when you assembled/recoded the sound in Vegas?

It is possible that Ady decoded the AC3 to six channels with DRC enabled. Unlikely though, BeSweet defaults to a straight decode with no DRC or DialNorm, and I would expect that Ady knows what he's doing.  I don't even know if AC3 on LD contains the same DRC profile metadata as AC3 on DVD.

schorman13 said:

Ady, is there any chance you could make the actual LD ac3 audio available?  Why did it need to be re-encoded in the first place?

It needed patching to fix the gaps at the LD side changes.

Post
#370858
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time
Mielr said:

Just for clarification- the script used for these discs stabilized the gate-weave and improved the aliasing as well (like in the PWNAGE edition)? The reason I ask is because in addition to everything else, the aliasing seems improved too.

Yes, g-force's script includes an anti-aliasing stage (it uses the newer NNEDI2 filter, which wasn't available when I did the Pwnage Edition).

 

Post
#370744
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time

From that image, there does seem to still be a bit of horizontal EE, but almost no vertical EE. From what I remember the R1 DVD was a vertical EE nightmare, with ringing apearing over every bright horizontal edge.

The old article I remember reading is here:
http://www.videophile.info/Review/TPM/TPM_01.htm

Post
#370737
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time

So PowerDVD says the audio is Dolby Digital 5.1 EX 448kbps. I thought the maximum AC3 datarate on a laserdisc was 384kbps? Or is PowerDVD giving the wrong information? (Too lazy to demux and check myself.)

Also, the official R1 NTSC DVD has horrendous halos due to edge enhancement (the R2 PAL disc had them as well, but not as bad). I've read that the HDTV source still had some halos, but was much better. Anyone with the R1 DVD want to do some screenshot comparisons?

Post
#370652
Topic
Avisynth help needed please.
Time
dark_jedi said:

Well the above crop is good until about half way through the avi file then it dramatically changes,so what I want to know is this,can I manually IVTC and manually crop at the same time,and if so how would this be added to the script?

DirectShowSource("C:\JSC SW 1-0001.avi")
DoubleWeave() 
part1=Pulldown(2, 4).trim(0,-13224).Crop(12,58,-8,-152,align=true)
part2=Pulldown(1, 3).trim(13225,-39130).Crop(12,58,-8,-152,align=true)
part1+part2


Post
#370500
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Mr Ghostface said:

... You can hardly call what I put off-topic, considering it's entirely relevant to the very fan edits we're discussing.

...

I'll make this very simple:

  • If you have feedback, comments or questions regarding Adywan's Star Wars Ep IV Revisted, post them in this thread.
  • If you want to discuss the illegality of fan edits in general, post in General Discussion.
  • If you want to moan about another site censoring your reviews (or not), or to point out that their disclaimers are nonsense, post in that site's forum.
Post
#370012
Topic
Maximum Size Of Member Signatures... (as of 25th Feb '18)
Time

We previously had maximum dimensions for images in signatures of 600px (horizontal) and 120px (vertical)…

As a growing number of members now use the site via their mobile phones or tablets, and whilst some others have slower internet speeds, or limited usage data… we have now decided that the maximum allowed size in total for anyone wishing to have a signature image will be 600px horizontally & 120px vertically - plus one additional line of default-sized text.

Animated GIFs are allowed, as long as they do not exceed the maximum image size limit stated above (600px horizontal, and 120px vertical), and are not greater than 100KB in size.
 

Any signatures containing non-compliant images may be removed without notice.
 

For clarity, the white rectangular image below is 600px by 120px:-

 

‘Text only signatures’ should contain no more than 7 lines of default-sized text in them - this includes lines used for any line breaks / paragraph breaks or gaps.

For example, the picture of a signature below uses 7 lines of text; 4 lines of text and 3 line spaces in between:-

 

Note 1 : Please do not have signatures that resemble anything like those of Jay & the moderators on here.

Note 2 : Site Contributors or Editors etc are allowed slightly larger sized signatures - IF required to help with informing fellow members of their projects/work. They are advised to ask a moderator beforehand if they feel they need a much larger sized signature.

 

This may be of interest on how to post images on the site etc - and some more other useful info too…

‘How do I do this?’ on the OriginalTrilogy.com - some information & answers to queries

 

Thank you.

 

Post
#370087
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time
adywan said:

Edit:

It's ok i just nominated myself for the biggest dick head award. The original bit for bit recording is fine. I had recently updated the drivers for the soundcard and there's an extra feature that doesn't seem to be linked with the main audio control panel and this one has extra effects. turns out that the problem lay within one of the new filters for playback. In the main panel all effects are disabled but in the new one there was a few new ones that were enabled by default. So the final DVD will have the bit-for-bit  laserdisc audio after all. I feel such a bloody idiot :(

I'm just glad you discovered where the problem lay. Reminds me of a similar problem I had a while ago - I couldn't work out why LAME was missing off the first half a second on my MP3 encodes, and it turned out to be a DirectShow filter causing playback problems.

Post
#370009
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time
adywan said:

EDIT: just done a short rerecord of the laserdisc 5.1 but this time i recorded it with the soundblaster X-FI crystalizer enabled and this seems to have cured a lot of the problems and also made the whole mix amazingly better. I think i may well go with the laserdisc audio for this project now if all goes well with the whole recording

Woah just a minute, I'm sorry but alarm bells are ringing now.

When you "record" an AC-3 stream off laserdisc surely the stream that you end up with is bit-for-bit identical to the digital data stored on the laserdisc?

The "sound" that comes over the SPDIF is effectively just "noise" (as it's encoded digital data). So how would running it through a proprietary processing system improve it?

Oh and BTW I Googled X-Fi and found this:
http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=54212

Post
#369995
Topic
Laserdisc revived - pics added - Japan Definitive Collection &amp; Special Collection (WIP)
Time
Aleksbmw said:

The best of these players is Ld-1010 if you can find one in good shape, it got much of the hardware from the LD-S1.

Funny you should say that, as I recently added the CLD-1050 to my eBay favourite searches. Is it reasonable to assume that the CLD-1050 would be a good option for capturing PAL discs?

Post
#369992
Topic
The Phantom Menace -Theatrical Version - NTSC DVD- ADYWAN - NOW AVAILABLE
Time

gltaylor74 said:

When comparing the Star Wars Episode I DD DVD (at 448kbps) to the DD on the LD (at 384kbps) it is no contest. The LD is far more agressive of a mix and faithfully represents the theatrical viewing experience that I had. The DVD sounds "dumbed down" so to speak.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Superbit/topic/4794/

So who's right?