logo Sign In

Moth3r

User Group
Members
Join date
26-Oct-2004
Last activity
16-Jul-2017
Posts
4,892

Post History

Post
#551581
Topic
'Raiding The Lost Ark' - a filmumentary. (Released)
Time

As usual, you've managed to dig up some great anecdotes for the commentary. Fascinating stuff, those 17 minutes had me thoroughly absorbed.

A couple of tips for the final version:
1. Take care with the volume levels, the original film music sounded too loud in some places when compared to some of the lower-quality audio sources used.
2. Run the text through a spell-checker!

Post
#551170
Topic
Star Wars coming to Blu Ray (UPDATE: August 30 2011, No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!)
Time

georgec said:

You know, the dust has settled after the BR release, but seeing that image made me shudder. How awful! Not only that, most people have been raving how great the movies look on BR but it's obvious that these transfers are extremely faulty.

Come here... put your hand on the desk.

*picks up hammer*

Now then, which two fingers will it be?

Post
#550426
Topic
Warwick Davis - Life's Too Short
Time

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b017cj76

A new series starting this Thursday on BBC2, might be worth a look.

Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant's follow-up to Extras, a spoof documentary following the showbiz life of actor Warwick Davis. With his career on the slide, a massive tax bill and a wife who is divorcing him, the star of Willow has no choice but to open his doors to a film crew 24 hours a day in the hope the exposure will get him back to the top of the showbiz ladder. He begins by seeking advice from old pals Gervais and Merchant - only to discover Liam Neeson has beaten him to it.

Post
#550253
Topic
Info Wanted: Is Netflix streaming a legitimate source for preservations?
Time

Asaki said:

Why can't we just plug a 360 into a capture card?

I know I keep saying that, but nobody's explained yet.

It should be possible (so long as the "analogue hole" hasn't been plugged), but obviously there are losses involved in re-digitising. A direct stream capture or a pure digital (screen capture) solution would be preferable.

Post
#545743
Topic
StarWarsLegacy.com - The Official Thread
Time

Darth Editous said:

And in case anyone cares, his hatred of fan-edits (his recreating starfields in Maya notwithstanding, I think that counts) was already burning six years ago - must see if I can dig out that email...

Try here.

Mike has always had strong views about fan edits (and fan films, too). It's ironic that you took some inspiration from his original Legacy project, and your edit went on to inspire Ady. 

Like most people here, I would rather watch a properly-restored version of the original (without fixed lightsabres, added motion blur and smoothed jump-cuts) than a fan edit. But I don't resent the fact that projects such as Revisited exist.

Mike may write harsh words on the subject, but expressing his honest opinion doesn't justify calling him a dick. I'm not surprised he's gone again (last time he "left" was after someone likened him to a crack dealer).

Post
#544210
Topic
Star Wars 1977 70mm sound mix recreation [stereo and 5.1 versions now available] (Released)
Time

hairy_hen said:

...

There are a few places where the 70mm definitely added sounds that weren't in the stereo mix...

Really? Up until now I thought the Dolby Stereo mix was identical (in content) to the Dolby 6-track (although some of the mixing choices are obviously different, to take advantagae of the better dynamic range offered by the 70mm format).

Can you give an example of where sounds were definitely added?

Post
#542256
Topic
Info: the Galactic Trade Federation website
Time

Thoughts:

1. This thread might be better in the preservation/other forum. I'll move it.

2. Yes we definitely need an up-to-date list and summary of the various projects created by members of this forum.

3. The current lists at the top of each forum (eg here) quickly become outdated.

4. A wiki-style approach seemed like a good idea, it worked briefly on that dvdholocron site, but takeup of the ot.com/fanedits.com project wiki (here) was disappointing.