logo Sign In

Mocata

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Feb-2017
Last activity
24-Apr-2024
Posts
2,396

Post History

Post
#1196290
Topic
The Last Jedi: Official Review and Opinions Thread ** SPOILERS **
Time

I actually felt like the jokes felt less well… jokey watching at home. Probably because there was no audience laughter. But that also means people enjoyed them at the time, before I heard any negativity. Other things also “felt” different, least of all the visuals of the movie were less striking on the smaller screen.

Post
#1196234
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

snooker said:
World-building can only be as interesting as the characters inhabiting that world, and all of the characters in the Prequel trilogy are so wooden. We see Mos Eisley for only a few minutes in Star Wars but it’s far more interesting and exciting than the Coruscant senate chamber.

Agreed. Tatooine as a whole in the first act of SW feels more fleshed out than anything in the prequels which just added that whole awkward Ben-hur slavery / racing pastiche.

Post
#1195871
Topic
Ranking the Star Wars films
Time

Handman said:

That’s a new one, for sure.

I’m not sure if my ranking has changed since the last time I posted, but:

  1. Star Wars
  2. Empire
  3. Jedi
  4. TFA
  5. TLJ
    … And then a huge dip in quality/enjoyment.
  6. Phantom Menace/Rogue One
  7. Attack of the Clones/Revenge of the Sith

I’m not sure Rogue One is down with those others, despite not being a fan. But otherwise a fair ranking.

Post
#1195377
Topic
Most Disappointing / Satisfying Aspect of the Sequel Trilogy?
Time

The villains and the Force went back to being interesting instead of embarrassing.

Meanwhile everything that crept in from the writing style of JJ-Trek is terrible, big loud emotional beats first, logic second. Especially Death Star III and R2D2’s magic map.

Not going to lie, the third instalment is very concerning to me now that Abrams and … some guy from Batman V Superman are on script duty.

Post
#1195313
Topic
Han - Solo Movie ** Spoilers **
Time

TV’s Frink said:

MalàStrana said:

Would be a weird move since Episode I-II-II already exist and are better than R1-VII-VIII…

paja said:

Ryan-SWI said:

Spending years watching this site trash the prequels for “ruining” their beloved characters and mythos but then championing this film as some innovative landmark is the funniest thing I’ve seen all day, thank you.

Comment of the year.

But only because I haven’t laughed so hard at a comment all year.

I was just going to say. I’ve missed this kind of thing since the other comedians all got banned.

Post
#1193051
Topic
What's Actually in the Movies? (for a GURPS RPG)
Time

But you don’t need to speculate, the stun is a visually different energy blast. It causes no physical burning or carbon scoring as Luke puts it. Everything else does. Maybe it’s not clear what happened to the troops, but I suspect that the fire and high temperature impacts kill them since they don’t react in any pain from the visible burns after they are down. I don’t think Han said “sorry about the mess” because Greedo was out cold and drooling on the table.

Post
#1193045
Topic
What's Actually in the Movies? (for a GURPS RPG)
Time

But the facts are the blue wavy projection style beam is for stun, as used in those two scenes. If people are secretly switching to a non lethal mode that also looks like their usual red blaster bolts so they can be more heroic or something, I’m not buying it. Han’s gun decimates the wall of Bay 94, and they usually do the same elsewhere. If the Imperial troopers wear armour to actually protect themselves then I don’t see that as a fact. It could be paper thin and designed for style over function for all we know.