I think I’ve seen clips with actors sat in that same space, but I can’t remember where it’s from.
If only the prequels had any real creativity in them. Instead it’s all embarrassing ideas that good editors had the sense to cut from the OOT, mixed with George’s idea of fanservice. You could argue it was at least the creator’s original vision, but then how much of the original vision is really his to begin with? After all George has always been more of an accountant than an artist. See? You can argue this either way just the same. Endless circular debates.
Since it’s already pirated I don’t think so, but I see what you’re saying.
I’ll wait to see if there is a Jimpressions or ACG video.
Speak of the devil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPXhyQ5S-nQ
What do you guys think? Would you watch this order?
Nah.
I’ll wait to see if there is a Jimpressions or ACG video.
So what language was Greedo speaking before ROTJ?
Sure I know “your skills are complete”. And yet still Yoda and Palpatine using a saber is a terrible idea.
Your_friendly_Imperial said:
Jedi don’t choke or electrocute people with the force.
Is this another Pigmen being sent to sleep thing
Both suck. Palpatine in the 2004 version has worse lines and gives a worse performance. He also has the crappy ROTS makeup.
Yeah it’s dumb but it’s better than the CGI rope being added.
It looks like a bootleg typeface you get free online.
“This weapon is your life” is a horrendous piece of dialogue. Like really… can all Jedi even hold a weapon like that? Or even need to?
Having just watched the Mandalorean, which was graded by the same colorist as the OT, I can see what they are going for. It’s revisionist, but in a less radical way.The Mandalorean is awesome by the way.
Would you say they are putting everything in line with the grading of Rogue One? Standardising / flattening the colors…
Yes, I think so. The Mandalorean in particular has a very barren look to it. I think the Star Wars movie/tv universe will look more gritty from now on.
Yeah that’s about in line with what I suspected.
Having just watched the Mandalorean, which was graded by the same colorist as the OT, I can see what they are going for. It’s revisionist, but in a less radical way.The Mandalorean is awesome by the way.
Would you say they are putting everything in line with the grading of Rogue One? Standardising / flattening the colors…
Damn I might be here a while
I hereby propose “Mandy”
I was just going to say this, so it’s now factual.
Why can’t they just pull a Blade Runner, in which they release another Special Edition while packaging it with the previous versions (original cuts, 1997 versions, 2004 versions, and 2011 versions)?
I think everyone would love that, but this is something they could have done for years and haven’t. Many have said Disney/Lucasfilm is either contractually obligated by Lucas to only release the revised editions, or they feel beholden to Lucas to not go against his wishes. I used to think that sounded like a crazy conspiracy theory, but here we are with a restored 4K HDR version of the Original Trilogy, that was done years ago, and no sign of the unaltered versions.
Could they be included in some way on the inevitable disc release? Maybe, but I wouldn’t bet my credits on it.
Or they like having one version only. The myth of one vision at this point is stronger than the reality, which is fractured. Beyond contractual agreements in handing George the money, this is the only reasonable conclusion. The Mouse House wouldn’t want to be seen as weak.
Except now they’ve put up the 4k hdr versions on the streaming service ahead of the physical UHD release and not the other way around. There’s bound to be a lot of overlap between fans signing up to see The Mandalorian / Cassian / Obi-Wan and those who were planning on buying the eventual 4k disc release of the OT. Now those in the overlap have one less reason to bother with the latter since they can just stream it whenever they want. Unless of course Disney were to throw something else into the package to sweeten the deal.
I don’t follow you? New releases, old releases, all that matters is the idea this was the “original vision”. Most people think George Lucas created Star Wars already and they will watch or buy any version without questioning it. Most people probably don’t care about streaming or HD or anything, they just consume stuff when it is presented to them. We are now on the 4th Special Edition it still says “1977” on the new service but only super nerds like us will even notice.
My point is that a lot of those same fans probably also signed up for D+ and can now stream the latest version of the movies, in full 4k and hdr if they so desire, whenever they want. So why would those fans bother to spend additional money just to own it physically? If Disney really wants the discs to sell, and sell big, they’re now going to have to throw something in other than just the same streamable versions with a higher bitrate and better compression, and I think we all know what that something is.
Well that depends on whether Disney wants physical media at all.
Why can’t they just pull a Blade Runner, in which they release another Special Edition while packaging it with the previous versions (original cuts, 1997 versions, 2004 versions, and 2011 versions)?
I think everyone would love that, but this is something they could have done for years and haven’t. Many have said Disney/Lucasfilm is either contractually obligated by Lucas to only release the revised editions, or they feel beholden to Lucas to not go against his wishes. I used to think that sounded like a crazy conspiracy theory, but here we are with a restored 4K HDR version of the Original Trilogy, that was done years ago, and no sign of the unaltered versions.
Could they be included in some way on the inevitable disc release? Maybe, but I wouldn’t bet my credits on it.
Or they like having one version only. The myth of one vision at this point is stronger than the reality, which is fractured. Beyond contractual agreements in handing George the money, this is the only reasonable conclusion. The Mouse House wouldn’t want to be seen as weak.
Except now they’ve put up the 4k hdr versions on the streaming service ahead of the physical UHD release and not the other way around. There’s bound to be a lot of overlap between fans signing up to see The Mandalorian / Cassian / Obi-Wan and those who were planning on buying the eventual 4k disc release of the OT. Now those in the overlap have one less reason to bother with the latter since they can just stream it whenever they want. Unless of course Disney were to throw something else into the package to sweeten the deal.
I don’t follow you? New releases, old releases, all that matters is the idea this was the “original vision”. Most people think George Lucas created Star Wars already and they will watch or buy any version without questioning it. Most people probably don’t care about streaming or HD or anything, they just consume stuff when it is presented to them. We are now on the 4th Special Edition it still says “1977” on the new service but only super nerds like us will even notice.
Why can’t they just pull a Blade Runner, in which they release another Special Edition while packaging it with the previous versions (original cuts, 1997 versions, 2004 versions, and 2011 versions)?
I think everyone would love that, but this is something they could have done for years and haven’t. Many have said Disney/Lucasfilm is either contractually obligated by Lucas to only release the revised editions, or they feel beholden to Lucas to not go against his wishes. I used to think that sounded like a crazy conspiracy theory, but here we are with a restored 4K HDR version of the Original Trilogy, that was done years ago, and no sign of the unaltered versions.
Could they be included in some way on the inevitable disc release? Maybe, but I wouldn’t bet my credits on it.
Or they like having one version only. The myth of one vision at this point is stronger than the reality, which is fractured. Beyond contractual agreements in handing George the money, this is the only reasonable conclusion. The Mouse House wouldn’t want to be seen as weak.
Fang Zei said:
I have to wonder if Disney isn’t planning on restoring the OOT –
I think you sentence is more appropriately ended there.
Isn’t ‘Art’ just some guy’s name…?
From the word Artifice, Artificial. Someone made it so it’s art. Whether you like it or not is a different matter.
https://abload.de/img/benvaderp8ktk.png
Jeez. Everyone is waiting for some miraculous OOT release and they’re doing THIS?
…Wait is Vader’s red/green suit control button been changed to red/blue like in ESB? Weird thing to notice… but y’know.
This is a creative use of the old artwork and audio version with the obvious limited budget for animation, kudos.
Oh what I mean is it’s literally called Our RoboCop Remake, as opposed to the actual remake that got released. It’s on youtube.
But that lends the weapon importance, which I kinda hate.
