logo Sign In

Mocata

User Group
Members
Join date
8-Feb-2017
Last activity
3-Jul-2025
Posts
2,664

Post History

Post
#1455497
Topic
The <strong>random YouTube / Vimeo etc video finds</strong> thread for the Original Trilogy
Time

Yeah he’s still going, he released this today https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY4mNIPmNnw

Is it me or have certain SW related channels got squashed by the algorithm and have next to no views? Jamie Stangroom has the same problem, but that could be because he tried to rebrand everything and add other types of content too often.

Post
#1454076
Topic
Why Rogue One doesn't work well as a prequel to Star Wars
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

Luke is very Vader like when he heads into Jabba’s but that is deliberate. You see him wearing all black. He force chokes a Gamorrean guard. He is there to get revenge on Jabba for his treatment of Han Solo and to free his friend. He at first tried to bargain with Jabba but Luke was prepared to carry out murder if necessary.

Well that’s the whole point, you’re not sure if he will turn in the finale. It’s a character moment, like in a real movie.

Post
#1450736
Topic
Why Rogue One doesn't work well as a prequel to Star Wars
Time

SparkySywer said:

CarboniteSolo said:

Vader was only trying to get the plans that were stolen. All these people were in his way shooting at him, it’s either sit there and let the firing squad kill him, or mow them down with a lightsaber. I myself, in that situation would have done the same thing.

Because if he loses the plans, he has to face the Emperor and the consequences for failing.

Darth Vader’s a fictional character though, justifying a story decision with in-universe facts doesn’t work. The writers could have just not had that be the case.

Imagine if a WW2 movie, which people like to reference to RO, ended with a scene in which a Gestapo agent slaughtered a bunch of resistance fighters. And then people cheered.

Post
#1448241
Topic
Why Rogue One doesn't work well as a prequel to Star Wars
Time

thebluefrog said:

Infernal Affairs II
Twin Peaks Fire Walk With Me

Better Call Saul

These were referenced above–now, I haven’t really watched much of them, but are people saying them because they are good PREQUELS or because they’re just good QUALITY? What did they change about the perception of the original story?

I chose these specifically, and didn’t pick Temple of Doom or The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly for example.

Post
#1447871
Topic
What do you think of the <strong>Sequel Trilogy</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

Shopping Maul said:

I see Star Wars in general as being a ‘band effort’ rather than the sole vision of one man. Yes, SW is/was Lucas’ creation, but the input of folks like Kurtz, Dykstra, MacQuarrie, Johnston, Burt, Marcia Lucas, Kershner, Kasdan etc etc really helped shape this universe significantly. If anything I see the PT as the equivalent of Mick Jagger reforming the Stones with an all-new lineup. So I don’t buy into the ‘George as canon’ thing at all. A Lucas-ST probably would’ve sucked.

Harsh. But fair.

Post
#1447641
Topic
Favorite Episode title?
Time

SparkySywer said:

The Empire Strikes Back. There’s no screwing around, you know exactly what this movie is going to be about. It’s not that I think more interpretive titles or more vague titles are bad, but I just think it’s kind of funny how absolutely straight to the point it is. If you count “Star Wars” instead of “A New Hope”, this is why I’d also say “Star Wars” has the second best title.

Yeah, this.