SilverWook said:
Computer Voice: There have been five versions with that name. Please specify by edition number.Scotty: 1977. No bloody 1981- 1997 - 2004 - or 2011!
Hahaha!
On the Death Valley pics - that’s great. I didn’t know some parts of Tatooine were outside of North Africa. I would love to check that out.
Well they are already doing the annual release thing now. Will they restrain themselves? I think it’s unlikely unless they have real concerns about the bubble bursting. Maybe they will not do the Marvel thing which has TWO annually now, but releasing less is another thing entirely. Unless they need that Christmas release window for another product line.
nickyd47 said:
I said, go to Google and type unaltered and you tell me what the first or second search suggestion is
No what I am saying is that who has heard of Smuggler’s Revenge, and who even buys books? It’s a niche inside a nerd fanbase. People that buy movie tickets to everything in the latest ‘Cinematic Universe’ are not going to care because they buy what they are told to. A few hundred people looking on Google or a dozen phoney eBay sales don’t amount to the kind of numbers needed to sell a real product on the global scale Disney wants.
“I shot first” was said during the Smuggler’s Revenge audio story and the entire audience clapped and cheered. You don’t think people get that the films were changed?
Well, some suggest that the reason we don’t have the OOT on Blu Ray is because not enough people know or care about the theatrical cuts but we beg to differ
The real question is what is Smuggler’s Revenge to a mainstream audience?
Cannot unsee Luke’s janky face or Leia’s tiny hands.
The idea that single unique negative for a film exists that has been forever altered is ridiculous to begin with, but the suggestion that digital effects and alterations done were “permanent” is more so. Lucas and his BS was always this way. Maybe he even believes it, since he came out with this line with talking about THX-1138 a few years after, but y’know the guy is missing a few marbles.
PTOTST in that order said:
I’m not a prequel troll.
Sorry bub you signalled this one too early.
I guess I’m fine with that. I just hope they haven’t changed TLJ scenes to have that happen.
Plenty of people do wear it.
Gary Fisher is there! Someone on reddit saw him and he pooped in the convention hall. Gary is leading the protest about the lack of a proper OOT release.
Sorry what is this about?
This makes me want to read it more
You just have to believe in yourself
Do my eyes deceive me, or are there some OT X Wings in the teaser?
I kept thinking that too, but I think it’s just the paint job maybe? A-Wings are there too but could also be slightly altered. Hard to pause the thing in motion.
Rogue One… or how I realised how to stop worrying and watch TFA. This is a cold, grey movie. I overlooked certain flaws (while admitting it’s lacking character development) on the first viewing, but seeing it again today one thing crept up on me. It’s kind of a dull slog up the end when they throw in a big spectacle. Tarkin is horrible. His head is even the wrong shape never mind the bad CGI or the bad voice acting. Leia is horrible, especially the way her lips move on her teeth when she says “hope” which is clearly not a new piece of audio. I want to like this movie, really. But it’s not happening, despite my lukewarm first impression which was more positive than not. The things that I liked before just didn’t provide the excitement another time around, and it doesn’t hold up. Sorry for the weird complaining but I just wanted to get it out of my system.
Instead of learning about Rogue One, we get to watch Warwick Davis fuel his ego. Shame, but I suppose that’s a perk of actually going there.
XD
Was that it, I thought I just missed the Rogue One segment
anyone figured what the whispers are in the trailer - if you listen carefully you can hear these whispers - but I can’t make them out…
I heard Yoda from ESB? Maybe Obi-wan too.
A trailer image gallery http://imgur.com/a/ByJ18#hRzdNqN
It reveals basically nothing.
Really like the poster, nice over saturated neon 80s throwback like Bob Peak.
suspiciouscoffee said:
Slashfilm? Blech.
Hahaha
Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) – ★★★1/2 (Ebert scale)
Good movie. The comedy works well and it’s a fun ride. Sam Neil is good, along with the rest of the cast. Good performances all around. I actually never knew that he was a New Zealand guy until I read some after watching the film.
Movie of the year!
More like triple. 😉
ROFL
I get the impression some of the people in this thread are the same split personality forever battling itself, maybe even agreeing with itself too.
Ray Park just came on to really give us that anniversary feeling
The problem is that taking action doesn’t really show a mass gathering, it actually just highlights how small the number of people is in comparison to those who just don’t care or can’t tell the difference. A few people demanding the OUT versus all those who just go and buy whatever edition is on the shelves; that’s the bigger issue.
So wait is really the only part of the event to directly talk about 40 years? What the hell.
