- Post
- #238844
- Topic
- Close call for "Attack of the Sith"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238844/action/topic#238844
- Time
Originally posted by: mverta
Speaks volumes.
_Mike
Speaks volumes.
_Mike
In what way?
In what way?
Mike O
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 20-Jun-2006
- Last activity
- 12-Jul-2025
- Posts
- 2,347
Post History
In what way?
- Post
- #238843
- Topic
- LOL Look at How They Try to Explain Away Continuity Problems!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238843/action/topic#238843
- Time
Originally posted by: Cable-X1
Can someone please ban this twit? He's worse than AdamWanKenobi......at least Adam has SOME redeemable qualities.
Keith is just sad AND clueless.
Originally posted by: BadAssKeith
This is Perfect material to use for some of my evidence for my lawsuit! Thank you very much!!!
This is Perfect material to use for some of my evidence for my lawsuit! Thank you very much!!!
Can someone please ban this twit? He's worse than AdamWanKenobi......at least Adam has SOME redeemable qualities.
Keith is just sad AND clueless.
Aren'y you a mod?
- Post
- #238842
- Topic
- LOL Look at How They Try to Explain Away Continuity Problems!
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238842/action/topic#238842
- Time
Originally posted by: lordjedi
I'm surprised they didn't say something like "The DVD mix is now considered the definitive audio mix for Star Wars". Of course, that'd just give us one more thing to talk about when they inevitably fix it in '07.
I'm surprised they didn't say something like "The DVD mix is now considered the definitive audio mix for Star Wars". Of course, that'd just give us one more thing to talk about when they inevitably fix it in '07.
And again for future releases.
- Post
- #238841
- Topic
- Interesting article about SW in Wall Street Journal 8/22
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238841/action/topic#238841
- Time
- Post
- #238839
- Topic
- BEAUTIFUL WOMEN NEW RULES IN FIRST POST (NSFW) UPDATED RULES
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238839/action/topic#238839
- Time
- Post
- #238838
- Topic
- So, this is how the DVDs are going to look...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238838/action/topic#238838
- Time
Originally posted by: darkhelmet
Well, there's the official line as I received from Lucasfilm Ltd. Publicity Rep John Singh that the LaserDisc source is the source "which represents the best restoration that has been possible on the original movies".
Whether this means that there doesn't exist a print or that Lucas won't allow a print to be made available is open to interpretation. Theories abound since Lucas went on a Star Wars film recall spree years ago and apparently destroyed all the prints he could get his hands on.
Originally posted by: ESHBG
I just can't get this out of my head: there has got to be some logical reason why these aren't going to be anamorphic (other than "Lucas trying to screw the fans over"). No matter how bad you wanted to prove a point, I doubt you would risk your company's reputation...right?!?!?!?!?
I just can't get this out of my head: there has got to be some logical reason why these aren't going to be anamorphic (other than "Lucas trying to screw the fans over"). No matter how bad you wanted to prove a point, I doubt you would risk your company's reputation...right?!?!?!?!?
Well, there's the official line as I received from Lucasfilm Ltd. Publicity Rep John Singh that the LaserDisc source is the source "which represents the best restoration that has been possible on the original movies".
Whether this means that there doesn't exist a print or that Lucas won't allow a print to be made available is open to interpretation. Theories abound since Lucas went on a Star Wars film recall spree years ago and apparently destroyed all the prints he could get his hands on.
Ahem.
- Post
- #238824
- Topic
- www.dvdempire.com O-OT pre-orders rankings (updated)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238824/action/topic#238824
- Time
- Post
- #238823
- Topic
- Even Cosmo Magazine is Talking About the 09/12 Release...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238823/action/topic#238823
- Time
It must be nice to be as rich as Lucas and be able to afford to sabotage a release of your own just to prove a point. But then again, did the '05 set get much advertisement?
As sales are slowly rising, his plan seems to be backfiring.
- Post
- #238821
- Topic
- Could Lucas screw movies up anymore (Indy 4)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238821/action/topic#238821
- Time
Originally posted by: auraloffalwaffle
[Pause]
[Starts to eat own head]
Originally posted by: generalfrevious
He might as well cast Hayden in the role!
He might as well cast Hayden in the role!
[Pause]
[Starts to eat own head]
LMAO!
- Post
- #238820
- Topic
- Could Lucas screw movies up anymore (Indy 4)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238820/action/topic#238820
- Time
Originally posted by: sean wookie
FUCK INDY WE NEED ALIENS 5!!!!!!!!!!
FUCK INDY WE NEED ALIENS 5!!!!!!!!!!
We did have Alien V. I was called Alien vs. Predator. This is further proof of my theory that some franchises should just be left alone and left to speak for themselves. Will Indy 4 ever happen? I hope not.
- Post
- #238817
- Topic
- General Batman Talk
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238817/action/topic#238817
- Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
Kevin Conroy was a great Batman. He was also a pretty kickass Bruce Wayne as well. I really can't say enough about that, except that the first few seasons of the Animated Series was just perfect... until FOX had to stick its nosy business into it.
Kevin Conroy was a great Batman. He was also a pretty kickass Bruce Wayne as well. I really can't say enough about that, except that the first few seasons of the Animated Series was just perfect... until FOX had to stick its nosy business into it.
WB were the ones who shifted gears over to The New Batman Adventures
- Post
- #238816
- Topic
- Tom Cruise dumped by Paramount.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238816/action/topic#238816
- Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
What about 'The Last Samurai'???
What about 'The Last Samurai'???
More John Ford that Kurosawa, and Cruise was his typical self, but Zwick's direction was excellent.
- Post
- #238814
- Topic
- How George Lucas created the O-OT fanbase...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238814/action/topic#238814
- Time
Originally posted by: Mielr
One way to settle the format wars would be for one the camps to convince GL to release the SW films in their format. People would go out and buy either a blu-ray or hd-dvd player, for the sole purpose of watching the films. I know I would- but only if the OOT was included.
I begged my Mom for my first VCR so that I could buy a tape of Star Wars and watch it, and I bought a LD player so I could watch the OOT on LD. I'm sure many others can say the same.
One way to settle the format wars would be for one the camps to convince GL to release the SW films in their format. People would go out and buy either a blu-ray or hd-dvd player, for the sole purpose of watching the films. I know I would- but only if the OOT was included.
I begged my Mom for my first VCR so that I could buy a tape of Star Wars and watch it, and I bought a LD player so I could watch the OOT on LD. I'm sure many others can say the same.
Lucas cannot seem to grasp this concept, which is a shame, as a proper OOT DVD release would earn him tons of money. Sigh. Pray.
- Post
- #238813
- Topic
- Tell imdb.com to separate their rating system for theatrical and altered versions of movies.
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238813/action/topic#238813
- Time
Originally posted by: theredbaron
Yeah, that'll REALLY help...
Originally posted by: BadAssKeith
Steven Spielberg or George Lucas?
Spielberg! 8424 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------(68.5%)
I like them both equally! 1810 -------(14.7%)
Lucas! 1254 ---(10.2%)
OOOOOOUUUCH!!!!!!!
LETS MAIL THIS STATISTIC TO GEORGE LUCAS AND PISS HIM OFF!!!!!
Steven Spielberg or George Lucas?
Spielberg! 8424 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------(68.5%)
I like them both equally! 1810 -------(14.7%)
Lucas! 1254 ---(10.2%)
OOOOOOUUUCH!!!!!!!
LETS MAIL THIS STATISTIC TO GEORGE LUCAS AND PISS HIM OFF!!!!!
Yeah, that'll REALLY help...
Yes, like I keep saying, we really don't want to piss him off.
And would the IMDB really listen to us?
- Post
- #238812
- Topic
- O-OT Star Wars "Bonus Disc" menus (www.starwars.com)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238812/action/topic#238812
- Time
Originally posted by: Darth Richard
Seriously those menus are facking awesome, I might just buy these when they go on discount at Tower Records, but arg I don't want them at the same time cuz I'm holding out for the Saga set. *Sighs*
Originally posted by: Mielr
LOL! "You want this....don't you?"
Originally posted by: Darth Richard
dammit those menus are so nice
must.....not...buy....but...menus....are....sooo......cool......aargh!
dammit those menus are so nice
must.....not...buy....but...menus....are....sooo......cool......aargh!
LOL! "You want this....don't you?"
Seriously those menus are facking awesome, I might just buy these when they go on discount at Tower Records, but arg I don't want them at the same time cuz I'm holding out for the Saga set. *Sighs*
What if the saga set doesn't contain the OOT, which it looks like it probably won't?
- Post
- #238810
- Topic
- O-OT Star Wars "Bonus Disc" menus (www.starwars.com)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238810/action/topic#238810
- Time
Originally posted by: JediRandy
A fan edit is a completely different thing. In any case, this is in essence the same as the bootlegs that have circulated for years, but it is made by a multi-billion dollar company and they expect us to pay full price for it.
Not by much, and nowhere near what it should be.
Originally posted by: Hal 9000
I am definatley not buying them until I see some kind of video clip from it, or am able to preview them in some way.
I'm undecided. If it looks like something I could live with, but still mumble and grumble a little, then fine. But I will not buy them if they truley do suck.
I won't suck as much as a fan edit.
I am definatley not buying them until I see some kind of video clip from it, or am able to preview them in some way.
I'm undecided. If it looks like something I could live with, but still mumble and grumble a little, then fine. But I will not buy them if they truley do suck.
I won't suck as much as a fan edit.
A fan edit is a completely different thing. In any case, this is in essence the same as the bootlegs that have circulated for years, but it is made by a multi-billion dollar company and they expect us to pay full price for it.
Not by much, and nowhere near what it should be.
Amen.
- Post
- #238808
- Topic
- So, this is how the DVDs are going to look...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238808/action/topic#238808
- Time
I couldnt agree more,I thought this is what everyone wanted,straight transfer of the original on dvd,i mean what the hell was the OT petition for,it was this right?
As these DVD transfers do not meet industry stards, I must repectfully disagree.
- Post
- #238707
- Topic
- DVD WRITING CAMPAIGN - WEEK ONE - "Entertainment Weekly"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238707/action/topic#238707
- Time
- Post
- #238697
- Topic
- How George Lucas created the O-OT fanbase...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238697/action/topic#238697
- Time
- Post
- #238689
- Topic
- www.dvdempire.com O-OT pre-orders rankings (updated)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238689/action/topic#238689
- Time
SW-66
ESB-73
ROTJ-88
Things are looking up ever so slightly.
- Post
- #238688
- Topic
- So, this is how the DVDs are going to look...
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238688/action/topic#238688
- Time
- Post
- #238687
- Topic
- Star Wars: 30th Anniversary (2007 - New Box-set)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238687/action/topic#238687
- Time
If Lucas can be convinced there is money to be made by spending what it takes to give the OOT a proper release, he will do so in the end.
I hope so too. But how long must we wait?
- Post
- #238492
- Topic
- DVD WRITING CAMPAIGN - WEEK ONE - "Entertainment Weekly"
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238492/action/topic#238492
- Time
Originally posted by: darkhelmet
Hey, Mike. A month would put us past the DVD release, so it most likely wouldn't be big news to the magazines anymore.
Now, if someone had a seedy inside scoop on the decision process inside Lucasfilm that resulted in NOT putting the OOT on its own release, then that might make it into print after-the-fact.
As far as the Mr's you mentioned, I think someone already PM'd Jay, didn't they? In the previous thread ("Addresses and Contacts")? I don't think I know the other two gentlemen.
Originally posted by: Mike O
I was thinking more along the lines of a month, if necessary. Does anyone know Mr. Sylvester and think that we could get his help? Along with Mr. Vuerta and Mr. Bulk, I find him one of the most intimidating people here, so I don't want to bug him
.
I was thinking more along the lines of a month, if necessary. Does anyone know Mr. Sylvester and think that we could get his help? Along with Mr. Vuerta and Mr. Bulk, I find him one of the most intimidating people here, so I don't want to bug him
. Hey, Mike. A month would put us past the DVD release, so it most likely wouldn't be big news to the magazines anymore.
Now, if someone had a seedy inside scoop on the decision process inside Lucasfilm that resulted in NOT putting the OOT on its own release, then that might make it into print after-the-fact.
As far as the Mr's you mentioned, I think someone already PM'd Jay, didn't they? In the previous thread ("Addresses and Contacts")? I don't think I know the other two gentlemen.
I was hoping that we could get the new out so that we could make some noise before the 30th Box next year.
- Post
- #238491
- Topic
- Star Wars: 30th Anniversary (2007 - New Box-set)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/238491/action/topic#238491
- Time
Originally posted by: Cable-X1
For crying out loud.....when is this bullshit going to end?
I seriously doubt that the OOT will be in this set. I think we're getting the 9/12 release for two reasons....one is curb the bootlegs and the other reason is so he doesn't have to release them ever again. I think that's why it's a limited release only. Lucas is doing it to get them out there, so he can say they're out there and we should leave him alone.
I wasn't going to buy the 9/12 release, but I'm going to now cuz I don't think we're ever going to see the OOT again. This is it and we mind as well not miss it.
There will be more changes to the films
For crying out loud.....when is this bullshit going to end?
I seriously doubt that the OOT will be in this set. I think we're getting the 9/12 release for two reasons....one is curb the bootlegs and the other reason is so he doesn't have to release them ever again. I think that's why it's a limited release only. Lucas is doing it to get them out there, so he can say they're out there and we should leave him alone.
I wasn't going to buy the 9/12 release, but I'm going to now cuz I don't think we're ever going to see the OOT again. This is it and we mind as well not miss it.
I think that we'll see the OOT again. As for more changes, I thought that that was a foregone conclusion.
- Post
- #237746
- Topic
- O-OT Star Wars "Bonus Disc" menus (www.starwars.com)
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/237746/action/topic#237746
- Time