logo Sign In

Mielr

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2006
Last activity
27-Dec-2024
Posts
2,805

Post History

Post
#753361
Topic
Film cells from a Technicolor print on ebay
Time

The history is fascinating, though unfortunately I know of few people outside film-themed forums whose eyes wouldn't glaze over at such discussions. ;-)

There used to be a dye-transfer lab in China (after the last Technicolor lab in England closed in 1978) but I think that one is gone now too. Richard W. Haines used the Chinese lab for his films and he wrote an article in 1991 for The Perfect Vision magazine called "The Return of Glorious Technicolor" which is very informative, if you can find it.

Post
#753277
Topic
Film cells from a Technicolor print on ebay
Time


NeverarGreat said:


So essentially the Technicolor film would be created based on the color separations, which were printed on Eastman stock.


Right, but the separations aren't "prints". They would be b&w negatives, 3 of them, each recording one color record (Red, Green, Blue).

"Three b/w color separations were produced from the Eastmancolor negative and printed by dye transfer on blank film"

This essentially re-creates the process of the 3-strip camera, without the film having to be originally shot that way. The resulting print would be dye-transfer (non-photochemical). Only the negs would be photochemical. This is how the IB prints for Star Wars were created.

The 3 B&W negs have to be combined to produce a full-color print, so if you're looking at something full color, you're not looking at a separation master (and nobody would have access to one to cut up and sell, anyhow).

With new blu-ray releases of older films, they're using sep masters to create photochemical prints for the new transfers. But even if Technicolor makes them, they're no different than if they were done by Kodak or Rank or any other film lab. The Technicolor name doesn't mean anything anymore since all their dye-transfer operations are long gone.

Post
#753257
Topic
Film cells from a Technicolor print on ebay
Time

If they are from SE prints, it's doubtful much fading would be evident. Willitts Designs sold 70mm cels from all 3 OT films from pre-SE prints in the mid-90's and so far only the ROTJ prints show significant signs of fading (different stock used).

True dye-transfer prints did not use a photochemical process so there was no Technicolor "stock" per se. They used blank/clear strips of "film" for their printing (which was a lithography-type process).

On a side note, I don't think any true IB Print would say "Eastman Safety" because that denotes a photochemical stock.

http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/oldcolor/technicolor1.htm

It's interesting, though, and definitely worth a bit more research. It's too bad that the cels are 'scope.

Post
#734973
Topic
Which version is better for the OT? Laserdisc or the limited edition 2006 2 disc dvd (GOUT)?
Time

msycamore said:



Not that this answer of mine has any bearing on althor1138's original question. But it depends on what pressing of the DC you own. At least one shot utilizes another source on early pressings of the DC (lightsaber shot in Ben's Hut). While the replacement seen on the Faces LD and the Bonus Feature DVD fixed a quite severe case of DVNR, it introduced another flaw here which is incorrect aspect ratio. But on the other hand those early DC pressings lacked the "Leia welding scene" in ESB among other things, so it's more of an early production flaw than a "true difference."

Ridiculously enough, the tranfers on the LD's overall displays slightly more vertical detail compared to the Bonus Feature DVD's and if we're going to be even more picky, different amounts of complete frames. And the LD's of course contains the 1981 re-release crawl on the first film. The latter might be enough to some collectors.


I knew about the welding scene and I was very careful to get a later pressing because of that (but instead got a copy of ROTJ with laser rot one one disc), but I've never heard about the lightsaber/Ben's Hut scene being different on later pressings.

I don't see the extra vertical detail on the LDs (even on the X0 screenshots from way back when--IIRC they were pretty fuzzy compared with the Gout). I think the LDs lost a lot of picture detail when they went through the extra analog pressing step, that the DVDs were able to skip. To each his own, though. I'm not a proponent of the blu-rays, either. ;-)

Post
#734917
Topic
Which version is better for the OT? Laserdisc or the limited edition 2006 2 disc dvd (GOUT)?
Time

There is a fun novelty in owning a LD player and LDs, but I personally don't think I would have spent money on a LD player if I'd known the GOUT DVDs were coming out. The image quality is far better on the DVDs, and you can find the JSC and other releases on fan edits if you're interested in seeing the differences between the different sources. The only real advantage the DC and Faces discs have are the PCM soundtracks, which blow the GOUT discs away, but the PCM tracks are available on fan edits as well.

althor1138 said:


It is not present in the DC. I can't say for sure about the faces. I only own esb(faces).


Isn't it the general consensus that the DC and Faces discs are the same, except that one is CAV and one is CLV? They are from the same masters, I believe (as is the GOUT).

Post
#734596
Topic
"Star Wars Costumes" (OT) book due in October...
Time

Wolfman said:


Costumes are displayed on mannequins but there are some costumes such as Chewbacca which show the individual mask and feet.
Great stuff !


Are there any photos of the actors in their costumes (like the front cover) or are all the interior pics of mannequins? I was hoping to see some rare/unseen pics of the actors posing in their characters' outfits. :-/


Post
#728994
Topic
What did Ghost Obi Wan mean?
Time


SilverWook said:


Mielr said:

Leia clearly had some "force" powers when she heard Luke calling her, post-duel, under Cloud City. Maybe she wasn't Luke's sister at that point, but I think she was the "other" Yoda referred to and it wasn't much of a stretch then in ROTJ to reveal she had acquired her abilities due to being part of the Skywalker clan.


 It can be interpreted both ways. Leia was the only one Luke could try to contact because of the strong feelings between them. He knew something had happened to Han. It might have been dicey to try calling Chewie, and he certainly didn't know Lando.


I don't know---I think they were clearly communicating that Leia had some sort of special force powers, sibling or not. I can't see Luke communing with Chewie or Lando via ESP. :-P

Post
#707360
Topic
General Star Wars <strong>Random Thoughts</strong> Thread
Time

Tobar said:


<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5Zg-UBTr1U">Does anyone know where this footage originated from?</a>

Doesn't look like the Behind the Magic CD-ROM as I don't recall it having behind the scenes footage like that. Guy says the whole thing is 12 minutes long.

Is that Marsha Lucas in that one shot?


I'm getting a "video does not exist" message. :-/

Post
#707173
Topic
Blu-Ray Of Unaltered Original Trilogy Rumour
Time

I've enjoyed the efforts of both Harmy and Adywan, and the recent releases of SW '77 and SW SE by TeamBlu are just fantastic, for anyone who hasn't seen them yet (I prefer the '77 version, of course). ;-)

I hope Disney decides to release the OOT soon, but if they don't, there are some wonderful options for purists (like myself) and revisionists alike.

This thread is starting to resemble some of the conversations on the YouTube OOT clips that I uploaded in '06. I'm astonished at how little understanding some people have for art in the context of the time period in which it was created. If someone constantly wants something upgraded and revised so that the current generation can "relate" to it, you're never going to persuade them on the merits of history or art, or even nostalgia. It's pointless ---- they will never understand. They have a flawed thought process, IMO.


pittrek said:

I'd love to see an 8K transfer of the Technicolor prints they still have


Some say you can't make transfers from Tech prints, some say you can, but they only made a print of the first film, anyway.

Post
#706829
Topic
Star Wars OT &amp; 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

You_Too said:



Mielr said:

I've only had a quick glimpse of SW SE so far, and it also looked very good, though a bit softer than SW '77, which I'm guessing is due to the LD source(?)


First of all thanks for your nice review! Anyway, the source for the SE is the TB version. It's a digital broadcast which is not perfect and does have some compression artefacts too. We did our best to make it look as good as possible.


I got to watch the rest of SW SE last night; I had to skip the Mos Eisley/cantina scenes, though...I just...can't. :-P In any case, it actually looked much better (sharper) than my initial impression. It's very obvious to me now that it couldn't have been from an LD source---I don't know why I didn't see that right away.

I did notice some of the compression artifacts you mentioned (an occasional smeary effect on moving/panning objects?) but overall it looked excellent. Great job on both versions! :-D

Additionally, I listened to the '97 PCM 2.0 track on the SE and it sounded wonderful. Also the extras and menus on both discs were great/unique, as were the cases.
Thanks again!

Post
#706203
Topic
Star Wars OT &amp; 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

You_Too said:



Mielr said:

I've only had a quick glimpse of SW SE so far, and it also looked very good, though a bit softer than SW '77, which I'm guessing is due to the LD source(?)

Anyway, the source for the SE is the TB version.


Ah, ok. I wasn't sure. That makes it even more astonishing that SW '77 still looks better considering it's from a letterboxed DVD source. Amazing!

riddler95 said:


I wonder if they'd go as far as giving the 1997 Special Edition Versions the same treatment as well?


I somehow doubt it. The real demand is for the OOT and I'm sure Disney knows it.

The "Special Editions" have been watered down so many times by alternate versions, that probably few people besides ourselves even remember the differences between the '97 theatrical versions and the various video versions that have come out since. :-/

I'm starting to not care if Disney ever releases the OOT on BluRay--- I'm sick of getting old waiting for it, especially with the great-looking efforts of TeamBlu and others.

Post
#705924
Topic
Star Wars OT &amp; 1997 Special Edition - Various Projects Info (Released)
Time

I just finished watching SW '77 and I am very pleased with the results of all your hard work (I listened to the '93 PCM mix). If I didn't know better, I never would have suspected that it was sourced from the GOUT. This really is an improvement over previous versions; you seem to have managed to squeeze every ounce of detail available from the source while minimizing flaws, so that (to my eyes) it nearly looks HD. This will become my default viewing copy of SW until Disney decides to release the OOT on BluRay.

I look forward to your versions of ESB '80 and ROTJ '83 even more now that I've seen what great work you've done on SW.

I've only had a quick glimpse of SW SE so far, and it also looked very good, though a bit softer than SW '77, which I'm guessing is due to the LD source(?) Hopefully, I'll find time to finish watching it tonight.

Anyhow, bravo! Keep up the great work! :-)


Post
#694735
Topic
A link to petition to name one of the stages at the Pinewood studios Cardiff after Richard Marquand
Time

I put the link on my SW facebook page in case any of my followers care to sign.

https://www.facebook.com/savestarwarsboycotttheblurays?sk=wall

Is there more than one stage to be named? Maybe both Richard Marquand and Richard Burton can have one named in their honor? ;-)

Marquand did direct one of the most successful films of all time and he was Welsh.
Name a Pinewood-Cardiff stage after him? Sure, what the heck. :-)