logo Sign In

Mielr

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2006
Last activity
27-Dec-2024
Posts
2,805

Post History

Post
#317493
Topic
State of the Trilogy/ annual SW depression
Time
Ziz said:

I've been reading thru this thread trying to follow the back-and-forth of the issue and I feel like everyone keeps missing something...correct me if I'm wrong.

The first thing that was logically done to create the SE's in 97 was to digitize the theatrical cuts of the films. They had to get them INTO the computer before they could start making any changes. So logically, the OOT already exists in digital form. Whether that form is up to 1080p standards, I don't know, as the conversion would be over 10 years old at this point, but I'd imagine it's close to it considering the nature of the process and why it was being done in the first place.

I gotta go with the feeling that something is in storage for a proper OOT release, he's just waiting until he's milked the SE's as far as he can. I mean, if you go back to the various interviews over the years of the creation of the OT (77 to 83), how many times did he start contradicting himself about where the story was headed and that that direction was always his intention? Old habits die hard. He's trying to constantly come out looking like the conquering hero in spite of all the numbers showing how many soldiers he's lost.

And one more thing to consider - ANH was one of the first 25 films inducted into the National Archives as historical achievements in motion pictures...this was LONG before the SE versions, so logically a pre-SE version of the film still exists somewhere outside of Lucasland. That could always be dug out of the archives and given a new restoration and transfer.


I also feel like we're going in circles- LOL! Have been for years now. :-)

I agree 100% Ziz, that probably EVERYTHING was scanned- and the decisions about what was to be changed for the SE was done later. Remember, Lucas said that when they first considered re-releasing the films, the only thing that he really wanted changed was the vaseline smear under the Landspeeder. When he realized what else could be done with computers- well, that's when he went nuts.

This is a man who kept every scrap of film from every effects shot, which is not normally done. Many times, once a composite shot is made, the separate elements are discarded.

The OOT exists- somewhere, even if just for posterity (and to use in a documentary like Empire of Dreams, CO), even if Lucas has no intention of ever releasing it again.

I don't buy the "the original negative was cannibalized to make the SE" argument. Why would that be done in the digital age? Not only would it be unwise, but it would be inconvenient as well. The entire film had to be color-corrected because it was fading, and from what I understand it was too far gone to correct chemically, so it had to be done digitally which means it ALL had to be scanned- not just the altered shots.

Now, whether or not he'll ever give in and release the OOT on blu-ray....that's a totally different issue and I really don't have a guess as to what he'll do. The ego part of him doesn't want to, the businessman part of him might.

......and remember there's also that Technicolor dye-transfer print (of SW at least) in his private collection that was used for color reference. ;-)
Post
#317392
Topic
New 'The Clone Wars' movie trailer
Time
zombie84 said:

Poster is now out.

I have to say, I am VERY impressed with the poster. Has a very oldschool Star Wars flair to it! Better than the prequel posters, I might say.

I don't care for the poster. It does look like the box of a video game, but them I'm not exactly the demographic that the film is aimed at.

I thought that the Struzan posters were one of the few good things about the PT.

Post
#317343
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
OperationBedlam said:

Sevb32 said:

That wasn't a trampoline, and you can't hear the bounce, no noise is recorded on the set like that, everything is done later in editing. You do hear Luke land, and his head pop back up from his crouched stance when he landed.


Maybe now, but sound did used to be recorded on sets. I may be wrong (I'm not doubting that) though I've always heard it was a trampoline that was the case and never anything to the contrary.



Even then, most on-set audio wasn't used. I think I read somewhere that about 80% of the dialogue had to be looped. That set was loaded with fans, smoke machines, etc. There's no way any of the audio would have been useable.

Post
#317340
Topic
Info &amp; Ideas: ESB and ROTJ Wishlist
Time
Ripplin said:

ben_danger said:

its cool how he wears black aswell.

Yeah, it looked cool. Quite un-Jedi-like.
For those of us that were around before ROTJ was released, the pre-release promotional photos of Luke in the black outfit were tantalizing. It made one wonder about whether or not Luke was going to align himself with Vader.

I've also heard that his saber ended up being green instead of blue because it wasn't showing up against the blue sky in the skiff battle scenes. It's interesting to see that it was still blue in the early trailers.
Post
#316825
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
adywan said:

vbangle said:

Ady, when the painting is finished, how are you going to scan it? Do you know what you are going to use? The techno geek in me is curious.....

I'm going to go down the photography route. I have had a few paintings scanned in the past and the results haven't been that good. the problem with scanning a painting is that the scanner emphasises the brush strokes and highlights them. the best route i have always found is taking a photograph. You need a tripod and good lighting, preferably daylight, but not too strong that there will be any reflections on the painting so never use a flash. I always use the self timer function because this eliminates the risk of any blurring when taking the picture. You do need a good camera though.
Have you had good results with photographing your art yourself? If not, it may be cost prohibitive but there are places that specialize in photographing art. When I worked for an artist's agency in NY, (the same agency that once represented the SW "circus" poster artist Charles White III, btw) they used to send all of their art to a place called Jellybean to be made into transparencies for the artists' portfolios or for reproduction purposes in magazines, or whatever. I imagine they do digital files now as well.

I have no idea what they charged, but I can't imagine that it would be too terribly expensive for one piece.
Post
#316744
Topic
Can you copy DVDs with iDVD? DVD-R newbie needs help please......
Time
Ok, so I just got my first new computer in 9 years (the old iMac finally croaked- at least the modem did) and so now I have a Macbook with a superdrive cd/dvd DL burner and I have no idea how to use it! LOL!

I'm trying to do a PiF by making a copy of a fan edit that someone sent me, so I copied the TS_video folder onto the hard drive (is that what I'm supposed to do 1st?) and then opened up iDVD to try and burn a copy of it onto a blank DVD-R but I can't figure it out.

Can you even do this in iDVD or do I need different software?

Help! Thanks in advance. :-)

(PS-before you yell at me, I DID do a search, but I'm still unclear as to whether or not iDVD can copy DVDs)
Post
#316743
Topic
Why is the GOUT not anamorphic?
Time
I agree with that part of it- I also think they did a pretty good compression job considering the source material. But I understand that compression is an issue with some dvds, and then there's the issue of the Gout's DD audio (vs. the LDs PCM sdtk ).

For me, the Gout is superior to the LDs because of the simple fact that I do not own (nor can I afford) an X0 or X9 player.

Post
#316741
Topic
How would the GOUT look upconverted on a BluRay player?
Time
It depends on the player, as well. I don't think there are many blu-ray players (yet) that upconvert sd dvds very well. The Toshiba hd-dvd players were supposed to be great with upconverting sd dvds, and a lot of people bought them just for that purpose (especially after they went on sale recently). But hopefully, future blu-ray players will get better with upconverting.


Post
#316726
Topic
Why is the GOUT not anamorphic?
Time
Fang Zei said:

I would think the reason you'd get roughly equivalent picture quality on either the DC laserdisc or the GOUT is the following:

DC laserdisc

pro: It's analog, and therefore uncompressed

con: it's analog, you need a top of the line player to make sure the laser is reading the track as accurately as it can.

GOUT

pro: it's digital, so the laser either reads it or it doesn't.

con: it's digital, so it's a compressed mpeg.
Makes sense.
Post
#316647
Topic
Why is the GOUT not anamorphic?
Time
Knightmessenger said:

Arnie.d said:


Interlace is different from telecine.

The GOUT master was probably oversharpened (which probably created the jaggies) to look better when played as a Laserdisc. And to mask the jaggies for the dvd release they probably applied a vblur.


So there were jaggies on the '93 master and laserdiscs? By oversharpened, do you mean edge enhancement? I don't remember seeing them, not even in X0 caps. What exactly would I see? And these jaggies are different from the ones that you get with an interlaced picture?
If by "jaggies" you mean the aliasing, then yes it's on the Faces and DC laserdiscs, too. The aliasing is sort of a breaking up of horizontal lines (layman's explanation) ;-)

FWIW, not too long ago Zion mentioned something in one of the threads about the Gout and the DC laserdiscs (as played on the X0 machine), being about equivalent in terms of picture quality.
Post
#316491
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Yeah, I think it was for some pick-up shots (or whatever they're called) that they didn't have time to do in Tunisia. If I'm not mistaken they ended up being the long shots of Luke and 3p0 in the landspeeder (which I guess were originally to include some close-ups of Mark). They were shot in the desert in California or Nevada I believe. I think I read in the new "making of" book that he had the accident the night before he was scheduled to shoot the scenes.
Erikstormtrooper said:

Mielr said:

As a matter of fact, there were still some close-ups that GL wanted to shoot of Mark before filming wrapped on SW, but Mark's face was too badly damaged to do them, so they had to shoot some long-shots to fill in, using a double.


Do you know what scenes these were?
Post
#316490
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
Ripplin said:

Mielr said:

Ripplin said:

Say, this is a bit off-topic, but I was just wondering if anyone knows why Carrie Fisher adopted a fake accent during her part with Tarkin. It was obviously a conscious decision (if it wasn't, they would've told her to cut it out, no?), so why was it done?
I remember reading in one of the SW "making of" books that she attended acting school in London, so she sometimes had a bit of a British accent when acting.

Interesting! Boy, that sure went out the window when she yelled "into the garbage chute, flyboy!" :D

Well, I guess that was her "real" voice, the other being her "official" voice. Better than Natalie Portman's, anyway. ;-)
Post
#316489
Topic
Why is the GOUT not anamorphic?
Time
see you auntie said:

totsugeki said:

....... Your DVD player or widescreen TV has a button to control aspect ratio - use it.


But the subtitles still display in the black space thus being cut off.
I guess it depends on the gear you have. On my Macbook, the subtitles aren't cut off, even when I zoom in to fill the screen on the L and R.

Also, my sister's RCA DVD player re-positions the subtitles when you zoom in.
Post
#316443
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
ben_danger said:

Mielr said:

He had a severely broken nose which was never to look the same again, and some facial scars, most noticeable near his upper lip.


dare we ask ady to unbreak his nose then for empire and rotj?...... then again i guess its an indirect form of method acting.

does anyone know if there were any scenes filmed before the accident that chronologically appear later in the film?

Hamill's nose was broken before SW was released, so.....no. As a matter of fact, there were still some close-ups that GL wanted to shoot of Mark before filming wrapped on SW, but Mark's face was too badly damaged to do them, so they had to shoot some long-shots to fill in, using a double.

He looks so dramatically different pre/post accident, I don't think there's anyway they could combine footage.
Post
#316424
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
ben_danger said:

Sluggo said:

Why would you want more Wampa?

Less is more.



and none would be infinitely better perhaps!:D .....but damaging to the story i guess.:P

wasn't it just put in because mark hamill had a car crash and his face looked a bit red?
He had a severely broken nose which was never to look the same again, and some facial scars, most noticeable near his upper lip.