logo Sign In

Mielr

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2006
Last activity
27-Dec-2024
Posts
2,805

Post History

Post
#329929
Topic
Yet ANOTHER DVD boxed set...*sigh*
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

 

Yeah and the Luke avatar is my favorite moment of the entire star wars series.  It is when he throws away his lightsaber and says "Never.  I'll Never Turn to the dark side.  You've failed your highness, i am a jedi like my father before me".

I've long admired your avatar - that's also one of my favorite scenes in the trilogy. I also like the scene when he says "I will not fight you father". In some ways I like the duel in ROTJ even better than the one in ESB. Sometimes I get the urge just to watch the last 20 minutes or so of Jedi- the funeral pyre scene is also one of my all-time favorite parts of the trilogy.

 

Post
#329805
Topic
Why was the '04 DVD set such a botched release?
Time

Baronlando is right, the early adopters were in large part to thank for letterboxed laserdiscs. And it wasn't just old ladies and soccer moms that preferred pan&scan- I remember listening to Howard Stern about 15 years ago, and he was talking about how he'd bought a bunch of laserdiscs and was going to return them to the store because he hated the 'black bars' lol. 

Negative1, are you familiar with the Home Theater Forum?

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/sd-dvd-film-documentary/

Movie lovers and videophiles discuss various aspects of home theater there, including software, and most of the major motion picture studios get ideas of which unreleased or OOP films are in demand, and they even have chats from time to time with the HTF members, to get information of what home theater enthusiasts would like to see.

Producing DVDs costs a lot of money- it's a gamble, and they won't release a particular title unless they know there's a market for it.

Also, many defective DVDs and blu-rays have been recalled and reissued because of complaints from HTF members.

I believe it was The Black Pearl blu-ray that was mis-framed, and because people on the HTF site and other sites complained, the disc was corrected and there was a replacement program instituted. 

I guarantee that if people had not complained, Disney would not have volunteered the information about the discs because it cost them money to replace them.

That is only one example, but it has happened countless times, including with the Back to the Future series which was also misframed, and the most recent release of Superman: The Movie because it lacked the original theatrical soundtrack.

Negative1 said:

so essentially you CAN upgrade your old versions from DVD -> HD ..

 

I really wish that was true, but according to the experts on this site and many others, you cannot create detail where there is none. I'm sure there are ways of making the GOUT look better, but it is never going to be hi-def resolution because the lines of resolution are just not there. 

Post
#329775
Topic
Why was the '04 DVD set such a botched release?
Time

negative1 said: 

look at my sig, look at it very closely, someday it will make sense to  you..

"[no GOUT in HD?->gout stabilize  ->color correction ->upscaling to HD ->GOUT IN HD !]"

I think there's a terminology misunderstanding here.

The GOUT is a term that specifically refers to the non-anamorphic DVD release from '06. There's no way it can be made into hi-def.

Do you mean the OUT or OOT? Those are more general terms for the Original Unaltered Trilogy or Original Original Trilogy and they don't refer to any specific release.

 

 

Post
#329740
Topic
Why was the '04 DVD set such a botched release?
Time
iRantanplan said:

AFAIR LOWRY did the restauration, not LucasFilm.

I think YCM labs did the original restoration on the prints, and from what I understand, Lowry never even had access to actual film- Lucasfilm just gave them hard-drives with the films on them.

I still don't think anybody knows for sure at what point the blue tint was introduced, though.

 

Post
#329622
Topic
Making our own 35mm preservation--my crazy proposal
Time
lordjedi said:

Second, isn't it illegal to actually own a 35mm print of a copyrighted movie?  I thought there was discussion around here a while ago about that.  Didn't somebody get fined or arrested for having 35mm prints of copyrighted movies?

 

No, it's not automatically illegal to own a 35mm print. 

Roddy McDowell had his 35mm collection confiscated, but it was more about how the films were obtained than about the fact that they were 35mm.

Post
#329469
Topic
Preserving the...<em>cringe</em>...Star Wars Holiday Special (Released)
Time
SKot said:

I did receive a DVD copy of the newly-discovered WBBM version.  The quality is also about a 9/10 and looks really good, almost having an edge over the KCCI version--however, due to the rough commercial edits (done on a VCR originally), the intro missing a few seconds, and numerous video glitches here and there, the KCCI is still the best version.

I'd still like to get hold of the original videotape if possible to see what kind of transfer we can get of it.  I'll continue looking into that.

--SKot

But, can't you just replace the missing bits of the intros and the video glitches with frames from the KCCI version?

I know I asked this question before, but nobody answered me.

 

Post
#329352
Topic
I can't BELIEVE this guy!? What an A**HOLE!!!! ROTJ Review
Time
sunday256 said:
Mielr said:
sunday256 said:

it just reaffirms my belief that there's very little difference between both trilogies other than time and technology. The core is the same.

 

Time and technology? Nah.

The major difference to me between the OT and the PT is that the PT has no sympathetic characters. They're not loveable and I don't care what happens to them. The complete OPPOSITE of the OT.

 

So let me get this straight...

You sympathize with a narcotics smuggler, a bitchy princess, a whiny/complaining adolescent teenager, an old self-serving-conceited-liar of a drunk, a two legged bear and a couple of droids?

 

 

LOL! HELL YEAH!

Not a fan of 'colorful' characters, are you?

What makes Han Solo so great is that he's this kind of questionable guy. Is he trustworthy? Who knows. Princess Leia is a bitch? Great! At least she speaks her mind and doesn't have a stick up her butt. 

Are you calling Luke whiny? At least we see him mature through the films and become a Jedi.

As far as 'whiny' goes, sorry, but young Anakin has the market cornered there.

Do you actually LIKE Padme and Anakin? I was hoping there was some way they could both die in the 2nd movie!

 

Thanks, that was the best laugh I've had all week.......:-D

 

Post
#329346
Topic
Jabba the Hutt Strategy
Time
Master Sifo-Dyas said:

When I first saw the movie as a kid, and saw Luke's black outfit ... force choking the gammorean guards and how arrogantly he threatened to kill Jabba, I was afraid he had already turned to the dark side. 

When I saw the early publicity photos of Luke in his black outfit - I was afraid of that, too. I think it was intentional on their part to leave it ambiguous. Then there were the teaser trailers that showed Luke standing next to Vader in the elevator, all in black- it did really look like Luke had turned.

 

Post
#329343
Topic
I can't BELIEVE this guy!? What an A**HOLE!!!! ROTJ Review
Time
sunday256 said:

it just reaffirms my belief that there's very little difference between both trilogies other than time and technology. The core is the same.

 

Time and technology? Nah.

The major difference to me between the OT and the PT is that the PT has no sympathetic characters. They're not loveable and I don't care what happens to them. The complete OPPOSITE of the OT.

 

Post
#329190
Topic
Siskel &amp; Ebert 'Secret Of Star Wars' special from 1983....
Time

Here's some more Jedi-themed retro fun for everyone, (after all, it IS still the 25th anniversary of ROTJ).

This is a report on some of those kooky, kooky fans standing in line to see Jedi on opening day including a couple who got married in line - dressed as Han and Leia, of course:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjce141miEs

Another report (I can totally relate to that kid who said his parents let him skip school that day- mine did too) :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNGAfTuEBd8&NR=1

Toys, toys, toys! A news report on the opening of ROTJ and the related toy sales:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcjs1RMF1iw

Post
#329188
Topic
I can't BELIEVE this guy!? What an A**HOLE!!!! ROTJ Review
Time
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

What an awesome find!  Siskel and Ebert look so young (Brokaw too).  Simon tipped his hand when he said "...if I had them" (refering to kids).  I bet if he had kids, or spent more time with them (or had a happier childhood himself?), then he might be singing a different tune.  As it is, I agree with Siskel that I feel sorry for him.  Siskel and Ebert rock!

 

Hey- that's my man Ted Koppel! (or as I like to call him "The Koppster") LOL!

I agree, if Simon had children, I think his perspective would've been different.

I read a bit of his bio, and it seems that had a bit of a notorious reputation for being a harsh critic of theater (mostly) and film.

Post
#329087
Topic
I can't BELIEVE this guy!? What an A**HOLE!!!! ROTJ Review
Time

I found this Nightline clip yesterday on YouTube while looking at some Siskel & Ebert clips.

I’ve never heard anyone so <span style=“font-style: italic;”>totally</span> clueless about the Star Wars films. John Simon must be the most humorless person on the planet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rB3V3qyZiFM

^ ‘Star Wars Nightline Discussion - Summer of 1983’