logo Sign In

Mielr

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2006
Last activity
27-Dec-2024
Posts
2,805

Post History

Post
#334489
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time
Oldschooljedi said:

There's one scene in particular from SW that I'm curious about: in the scene where Luke and Han are walking down the steps during the medal ceremony, there's some odd aliasing in the area of Luke's mouth. I wonder how well the script handles that (?)

I looked at the scene and would say 'no'.

"No" meaning, it wouldn't help it at all, or, "no" meaning you've already looked at the processed version of that scene and it still looks bad?

 

Post
#334372
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time

 

Oldschooljedi said:

Maybe the script needs to be changed for every movie individually, I don't know.

My thought was, that what improves ANH, improves ESB and ROTJ too and when the encodings were done I was satisfied with the result. Maybe the result would become even better with a individual script for every single movie, I don't know.

Yeah, except for the weird artifacts in the last one, the screenshots look good. 

 

There's one scene in particular from SW that I'm curious about: in the scene where Luke and Han are walking down the steps during the medal ceremony, there's some odd aliasing in the area of Luke's mouth. I wonder how well the script handles that (?)

 

 

Post
#334297
Topic
GOUT image stabilization - Released
Time
Oldschooljedi said:

I'm sure the actual script 3.09 makes a good job with ESB and ROTJ too, because the quality of the unprocessed videos is a littlebit superior compared to the unprocessed ANH.

I encoded all three movies earlier this year with the script that was actual at this time and the result was really, really good, although I did not alter the script for every movie.

ROTJ looked the best with the script then.

Well, ROTJ looks the best of the three right out of the box, so that makes sense. 

What about the anti-aliasing part though? SW has the worst aliasing problem, and it's surprising that the anti-aliasing part of the script didn't negatively affect the other 2 films since they didn't have as bad a problem as SW did.

 

Post
#334107
Topic
We should sue George Lucas.
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

You know the most moving thing emotionally about Lucas and Spielberg's Films is John Williams Music.  I Don't think he gets nearly enough Credit what would Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Or Jurassic Park be without his music.

Not only does the music lend Humanity to the characters, but lends believability to them.  Under Williams you believed Superman could fly, and Elliot and ET could fly.  The Grandeur of Jurassic Park was almost completely in the score not the often mentioned cgi. Star Wars succeeds as well as it does because it is almost written as an opera without singing, space operas were never meant to be literal but Star Wars was indeed an epic space opera.

I find it in no way bizarre that almost all my favorite movies have had a Williams Score. 

Even some of my most hated movies as well, but i at least like the soundtrack for them Like Episodes 1-3.

In fact probably the biggest dissapointment to me in years was the Indiana Jones IV score as it seems like it was totally phoned in so i don't own that cd.

One of the greatest thrills of my Cinema going life was to hear a reprise of the superman theme in the Score for Superman Returns.  The movie stunk but that was quite exciting. 

I agree. 

One of the reasons I wanted to see Superman Returns was for the opening credits with the Williams theme. I never saw any of the original Superman films in the theater, so I was glad for the opportunity.

I was disappointed in the ROTS soundtrack, though, especially the end credits because they sounded very cobbled together and mishmoshy. I liked it very much when they used the throne room music in the end credits for Jedi, however. Jedi is probably the soundtrack I listen to most- the Luke & Leia theme is my favorite.

 

Post
#333703
Topic
Puggo GRANDE - 16mm restoration (Released)
Time
Puggo - Jar Jar's Yoda said:

GOUT reassessment...

I just recently got a widescreen plasma TV (a 58" Samsung).  Previously, I had only viewed the GOUT on a 4:3 TV.  This morning, for the first time, I tried watching the GOUT on the new plasma... and for the first time I appreciate just to what extent the GOUT truly is - to quote Luke - a piece of junk.  WOW.  They actually rendered it unwatchable on a modern display.  Now I'm beginning to realize why some posters are hoping that the Puggo Grande might turn out more watchable -- I'm beginning to wonder if it just might.  Amazing.

Crap- I hate hearing that. :-( I haven't had the "pleasure" of watching it on a large plasma or LCD screen yet.

Am I correct in assuming that SW looks worse than the other 2?

Post
#333556
Topic
Apparently there were message boards discussing the OT back in '83.
Time
Sluggo said:
Mielr said:

Janskeet said:

Apparently there were message boards discussing the OT back in '83.

They were originally made of cork. ;-)

 

 More of Mielr's tacky humor.

"tacky".......*groan*!!!!! LOL!

I like this one:

 

"Winner. Perhaps not quite as crafty an ending as I had hoped, 
but a reasonably satisfying ending.  I felt very good leaving 
the theater (not because I was leaving, but because the movie 
was so good). 

I am afraid that the movie is possibly not suitable for very 
young children; parents may wish to check it out ahead of time. 
There are some scenes which are a little violent and possibly 
scary for young children. 

General consensus of 12 of us: 10 out of 10, possibly the 
best of the three.  We are all going to go see it again 
before making any critical analysis of plot or effects. 
The overall feeling was good, however.  The crowd for the first 
showing at Atlanta's Phipps theater (the only Atlanta 70mm 
print) applauded and cheered many scenes throughout the movie, 
and gave a standing ovation at the end. Of course, some of 
these folks were die-hards who camped out all night to be 
first in line. 

Bottom line: the film could have been a tremendous let-down 
after the first 2 and all the attendant speculation.  It was 
not a let-down -- it was a very pleasant experience. I would 
easily rate this a $6 or even $8 movie -- even the second 
time around!"   Gene Spafford 

 

 

Post
#333550
Topic
"BRING BACK STAR WARS" Channel 4 UK documentary coming soon...
Time

skyjedi2005 said:

Bring Back Star Wars.  they should do a show called "let it die" featuring Indiana Jones and Star Wars.

You'd like it, Sky. I mean, I'm like you in that I'm not interested in anything related to the PT, and I enjoyed it because it has to do only with the OT actors/characters. The interviews are some of the most candid I've ever seen.

LordVader said:

just fast forward through all the added scenes in the GOUT DVDs

???