logo Sign In

Max_Rebo

User Group
Members
Join date
12-Jun-2005
Last activity
27-Feb-2024
Posts
238

Post History

Post
#311363
Topic
Star Wars Prologue - Epic Prequel Edit (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: DarthBo
Originally posted by: Anti-Matter
Are you sure that Qui-gon should (or needs to) ghost-out at the moment of death? I have to check again, but someone I spoke with seemed to "know" instantly that Qui-gon cannot ghost-out, based on a private conversation between Yoda and Obi-wan.

This was originally all explained in episode III, but as Liam Neeson didn't want to reprise his role the scene was cut. The novel is a must read if not for this scene alone.
In short: when Jedis die, they stop existing, like normal beings. Qui-Gon Jin however learned how to 'join with the Force, yet retain consciousness'. So after he died he was still able to talk with Yoda through the Force. He told Yoda what he had learned and also told him that with training 'perhaps, in time, even your physical self' could be retained.
So there you have it: Qui-Gon didn't disappear because only his mind became one with the Force. Obi-Wan was the first to become physically one with the Force, thus disappearing.

If only it were possible to add this scene to the film (Neeson soundalikes step up please)...


I'd rather Qui-Gon just disappeared then you wouldn't need the terrible explanation! this is George's attempt to explain Obi-Wan's line "I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine" but that could have easily been explained away by the fact Anakin was not a Jedi Master and may not have learned all the jedi's secrets, even if he knew jedi disappeared (he should do he killed enough!) he still wouldn't know they had the power to come back. (all this is of course based on information from the Original trilogy, or at least doesn't contradict it, unlike the prequels)

you could also consider showing some other Jedi disappearing during the Order 66 and Genosis sequence.

I'd also love it if you could remove the emperor's melted face from EPIII, as this really didn't need to be explained in the prequels.

Post
#311341
Topic
Star Wars Prologue - Epic Prequel Edit (Released)
Time
I've not seen any of the other 3 into 1 prequel edits, but it is a good idea and possibly the only way to make the prequels watchable (for me anyway), what bothers me most about the prequels is the complete lack of continuity with the original trilogy but with this edit you can probably just skim over the offending stuff without it seeming obvious.

the Jar Jar removal looks great, keep up the good work.
Post
#311274
Topic
Help Wanted: PAL/NTSC hybrid transfer query
Time
I'm not an 'NTSC user', but I would always rather have the scope frame (providing this is the intended ratio), a scope film will almost always look better that way, you lose too much by cropping of the sides.

If your this bothered about detail just get an HDTV, and download wookiegroomer's WMV files, that way you get the highest possible detail and the correct ratio.
Post
#311012
Topic
Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation (* unfinished project *)
Time
Just a quick update for those who are interested, I found a bit of time last night to do the colour correction on the few frames I'm using from the GKAR and it looks pretty good, I doubt anyone else would be able to notice them but I can still see the difference so I need to improve the Avisynth script a little, but I know what to, so that only really leaves the initial pan down to fix and then the video for ESB will be done.

Unfortunately I was playing around with the audio and I'm not convinced that the 5.1 track I have is genuine, I can't hear any separation in the rear channels which doesn't bode well so I'm looking for another source.

but on a more positive note I should soon be receiving copies of the Flunk and the Reivax.

That's it for now.
Post
#310728
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Originally posted by: corellian77

* I'm a huge fan of the OT, and love the original Fett voice, BUT... if the goal is to match up the OT:SE with the PT, then perhaps Temuera Morrison's voice should stay? Otherwise wouldn't that create an inconsistency (he is a clone afterall, not just Jango's son... it should be identical, no?)


No it shouldn't be the same, voices are not genetic! If you took a set of identical twins and seperated them as tenagers and they grew up in totally different environments for 20+ years they would no longer sound the same (if they even did in the first place). You don't even need to explain this with a voice scrambler or something, there is just no reason for their voices to be the same.

Using Temuera Morrison's voice was just a cheap attempt to link the two trilogies, maybe if his delivery of the lines wasn't so bad then it would be OK, but it is a change that only damages this great film.

Sorry for the rant but this kind of stuff really bugs me. The theatrical version of ESB is great and I think some people here are just looking for things to change just to make it different, that's what Lucasfilm did and we ended up with a worse version of the trilogy.
Post
#309890
Topic
Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation (* unfinished project *)
Time
Originally posted by: Sojourn
I know for me, it was also the one I watched the most when I was younger, so it has a warm place in my heart. The SE VHS set was the first copy of Star Wars I owned.


Same here, I don't even know how much I'll watch these it's just something I'd like to have.

Originally posted by: Reave

So then, what is the status on this project?


I haven't had the time to do much since my last post so currently the video for ESB is complete except for some colour correction on 18 frames and fixing the initial pan down from the crawl, the 2.0 audio is already in sync but I still need to sync the 5.1 (using an AC3 file provided by Darth Mallwalker which seems to be a genuine Laserdisc rip)

I think I will now do ROTJ next as I have finally managed to rip the video from my TB disc (after at least 15 attempts with 5 different disc drives) and I think it should be a fairly straight forward process.

For ANH I am still hoping to get a copy of the flunk version which was was uploaded to the newsgroups back in 2006 see here, but I will soon have a copy of the reivax (and the first layer of the flunk but I'd really like the whole thing)

I don't think anything is going to take all that long to do it's just a matter of finding the time as I'm about to move house and I'm looking for a new job.

I'll keep you all updated.
Post
#309783
Topic
Help Wanted: Request - Star Wars episodes IV, V, VI &amp; 1997 Special Editions
Time
Originally posted by: reave
Does anyone have the "TB Release" SE Trilogy? I've searched high and low for this, and I can't find anything.

Oh, and do these have burned-in subs? What language? Crawl language?


most people who have the TB release (myself included) have reported CRC error and are unable to copy them, I have recently been able to rip the main title from the discs but I havn't tried copying them recently.

The TB has an english crawl, and the subs are not burnt in but are soft subs in english.

The TB has a number of problems (missings/corrupt frames, squashed picture and bad starfields), so I am currently working on a best possible version of the 97 SE, see here

Post
#309302
Topic
Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation (* unfinished project *)
Time
Originally posted by: Moth3r
After mentioning the Flunk release in the other thread, I've also remembered there was another transfer called the Reivax version. Again, apparently it's a professional digital beta tape transfer, but I think only ANH was ever made available. I have no idea how the quality compares.

Ideally I'd like to get copies of the flunk and the reivax before I start on ANH, so if anyone is willing to share please send me a PM, I may also need another copy of the ROTJ TB release as mine is a bit scratched up and wont rip, but that's a way off yet.


Originally posted by: Moth3r
@wookielover69: Max_Rebo stated above he will be making both PAL and NTSC versions.

From what I've gathered, the plan is to make an NTSC version by combining video converted from the PAL with the untouched Dolby Digital track off the NTSC laserdiscs (although minor edits may be required if the DVB and LD versions have differing frame counts). I assume also that Max will be making a new 5.1 mix for the PAL version by speeding up the LD audio and re-encoding a new AC3 track.


I think Moth3r hit the nail right on the head here, that's exactly the plan.
Post
#309242
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Dunedain
Max_Rebo: Yeah, I suppose the image could be stretched the precise amount needed to correct the degree to which the PAL image is squashed, so that it exactly matches the correct 2.35:1 aspect ratio of Star Wars. But would stretching the image to correct the squashing cause it's own image artifacts, or does the video look perfect (as if the image had never been squashed or stretched at all) just like the 2004 DVD after the stretching correction is applied? You have my confidence that it can be pulled off.

By the way, if you want any info. on how to handle putting the few frames you might need from the GKAR version into the TB version, you might want to ask the guys from the Star Wars X0 Project, they had to do the same thing with the U.S. Definitive Collection laserdisk set. They might be able to help with how to make the colors and such match up perfectly between the two sources, and maybe other stuff, too.

I don't think it will introduce any additional artifacts, it will be a bit like people making anamorphic versions of the GOUT, it should look perfect afterwards.

Originally posted by: Moth3r
That's some bad MPEG artefacting in the GKAR shot above.

Have you investigated the quality of the Flunk version? It was apparently encoded direct from the digi-beta rather than a captured DVB source - potentially the best version yet - but unfortunately from the shots I've seen the image was corrupted in several locations. Still, it might be possible to replace the corrupted parts with video from the TB release.

Also, can I suggest starting a new thread for this discussion - titled "Max_Rebo's definitive '97 SE preservation superset" or something similar - rather than tack it on to the thread about the TB version.


yeah the GKAR is so much worse than I thought it would be but hopefully none of that will be noticeable in the end.

I believe the flunk was only for ANH so I hope to look at it before I start on that one as from what I've heard where it's good it's really good but where it's bad it's really bad.

suggestion taken new thread is now here: Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation

Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
From its .NFO file, Flunk wasn't a straight transfer. It had "its colors and contrast imporved." [sic]
It's possible those imporvments might need some restoration. Proceed with caution....


advice noted, and I have sent you a PM.


PLEASE NOTE: Further discussion of Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' should take place here, this thread should be used for discussion of the TB set.

Post
#309241
Topic
Max_Rebo's '97 SE superset' preservation (* unfinished project *)
Time

This thread is for the discussion of my 97 Special Edition preservation following on from the discussion that started in this thread. (mainly pages 6 - 8)

My intention is to use the best available materials to put together a best possible version of the 97 SE. The main reason for doing this is that to me this is now the version of these films that is least likely to ever get a proper release, and in my opinion they aren’t as bad as the dvd versions.

For various reasons I am starting by doing ESB using the video from the TB and GKAR sets as a source (both are PAL), to my knowledge these are the only two anamorphic sources available, and conveniently they are based of the same master so are very easy to cut between. The audio will be both 2.0 and 5.1(from the laserdiscs) and there will be both NTSC and PAL DVD-5 versions.

Some examples of the relative quality of the two sources:
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5387/esb2vp1.jpg
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/2536/esb3ti9.jpg
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3743/esb4oo5.jpg

As you can see the TB version is much better but unfortunately it has a few missing frames and encoding errors so these are being filled in with the GKAR footage. So far the video file comprises of only 18 frames from the GKAR (not including the credits) which fill in missing/damaged frames and only one of those frames is noticeable when you watch it and will require some colour correcting.

The only other video problem I have so far noticed is the starfield in the opening shot of the TB just disappears as the camera pans down so I will need to fix this shot:
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/2982/esb1xx8.jpg
The GKAR set doesn’t suffer from this problem but obviously I can’t use the whole shot from the GKAR as the crawl is in German, also this is the only shot of the film that isn’t framed the same in the two versions so I can’t simply cut from one to the other, it shouldn’t be to difficult to fix I just haven’t got around to it yet. All in all the TB set is pretty weak for starfields, but the GKAR set has been excessively filtered so the stars blur on pans (except for this shot) so either way the stars wont look as good as we’d like, but I’ll do my best.

After ESB I will do ANH for which there should be a couple more anamorphic sources available (although I only have the TB and GKAR at present) and then ROTJ for which I currently only have the GKAR and some of the TB.

I think that basically covers it but it’s late here and I’m tired so I might not be making any sense so feel free to ask questions.

Post
#309104
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Dunedain
Max_Rebo: You mean the image itself (not counting the black bars) in the TB version is squashed vertically? Meaning that Leia in that screen shot you posted is made to look shorter in the TB version than she looks in the U.S. SE widescreen laserdisk set in that scene? If that's the case, there's no way to correct for that, as the source image itself has already been squashed.

Is it noticeable, or is the squashing effect so tiny that even if you were watching the TB version and the U.S. SE widescreen laserdisk side-by-side on different televisions that you couldn't see the difference? Thanks for any info.


Yes everything appears squashed vertically and it is noticeable, but it is very easy to correct by just stretching the image a little vertically and/or adding a small amount of pillar boxing in the over-scan area, trust me everything will look right at the end, this was one of the first things I did and would need to be done for the PAL to NTSC conversion anyway.

my intention is to make sure that the aspect ratio matches the official DVD exactly so that it is easier for people to use in editing.

Have faith.
Post
#309080
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: bkev
IMO, the GKar set seems to have better colors - but, the TB has greater detail. Unfortunate about the stars, I wish you luck in fooling around with that.

I'm not sure I posted the best shots for colours as generally the TB has better colours, the GKAR is less saturated and a bit over bright.

Originally posted by: Dunedain
Max_Rebo: Thanks for the info.! I see what you mean about the video, the TB version has better detail and clarity than the GKAR version. There is perhaps the slightest hint of grain in the TB version, but as you said, it appears to be just a natural film grain, not noise, so that's fine, no problem at all. And the picture does indeed look great in the TB version, superb detail!

Here's a better example showing the difference in the grain:
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/3743/esb4oo5.jpg


Originally posted by: Dunedain
What is the resolution of the TB version? Do you know if the TB version video is in the same aspect ratio as the video in the U.S. Star Wars 1997 SE widescreen laserdisk set (which is 2.35 to 1, I think)?


the actual image resolution of both the TB and the GKAR is 704x408, they are anamorphic but the bars aren't the right width so they appear squashed vertically, but I'm pretty sure the actual aspect ratio is 2.35:1 (or close to it), I have yet to check but I'll let you know when I do.

Originally posted by: bkev
OK, so uh... one question: these all have different amounts of footage, right? Some cropped in areas and others not? Would it be easy to combine them, or not worth the time?

Then again, I could be wrong about this whole thing.


THE GKAR and TB are framed/cropped the same (except in the first shot) and they should have the same footage it's just that the TB dropped a few frames when it was captured. So it is very esasy to combine the TB and GKAR, but it wouldn't be worth using laserdisc material if that's what you mean.
Post
#309011
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Dunedain
Max_Rebo: Will the NTSC version on DVD have the video down-converted to the correct NTSC DVD video standard (which is 480i resolution, I think), so that the DVD's will play on any standard U.S. NTSC DVD set-top stand alone DVD player (not a computer DVD drive) hooked up to a regular NTSC television set?

Hopefully the NTSC version will conform to all the proper NTSC standards and playback fine on NTSC equipment.

Originally posted by: Dunedain

This is a great idea, to put together the best possible Star Wars SE (1997) DVD set. So this will be combination of the highest quality PAL video source, plus the 5.1 soundtrack from the U.S. Star Wars SE laserdisk set, correct?

correct.


Originally posted by: Dunedain

Wouldn't it be easier for the NTSC set to just do the best possible transfer from the U.S. laserdisk set and then put that on a dual-layer DVD for maximum quality? Or is the idea that if you start with a PAL video source that is at a higher native resolution than even the NTSC DVD video specification, and then slow the video down to the correct NTSC 23.976 frames per second, that you will then be able to make an anamorphic NTSC DVD 480i video conversion from this that doesn't have any grain or other resolution problems in the picture quality?


Yes that's the idea, the original PAL source should offer a much better picture quality than is possible from a laserdisc transfer, although it will most deffinitely have grain, and probably more than the laserdiscs do, but that's a good thing!

Originally posted by: Dunedain
Thanks for any info., this set sounds very exciting!


Not a problem.


Now for the promised screenshots and a progress update.

Here is a nice example showing the superior quality of the TB set, just look at that fur, it's much better defined:
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5387/esb2vp1.jpg


Here is an example to show what I meant above about the grain, you can (hopefully) see that the TB is more grainy, but the grain and the quality go hand in hand, and this is real film grain not noise:
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/2536/esb3ti9.jpg


and here is an example of one of the problems with the TB set, this is from the opening shot, as the camera pans down from the crawl the starfield just disappears:
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/2982/esb1xx8.jpg

The GKAR set doesn't suffer from this problem but obviously I can't use the whole shot from the GKAR as the crawl is in German, also this is the only shot of the film that isn't framed the same in the two versions so I can't simply cut from one to the other, it shouldn't be to difficult to fix I just haven't got around to it yet. All in all the TB set is pretty weak for starfields, but the GKAR set has been excessively filtered so the stars blur on pans (except for this shot) so either way the stars wont look as good as we'd like, but I'll do my best.


So far the video file comprises of only 18 frames from the GKAR (not including the credits) which fill in missing/damaged frames from the TB and only one of those frames is noticable when you watch it and will require some colour correcting.


I think once I've got ESB done ANH should come together really quickly but ROTJ is a whole different story (more on that later).

That's all for now, I'll keep you all posted on any developments.


And I'd like to end by saying AviSynth really is amazing!

Post
#308980
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: LexX
Originally posted by: Max_Rebo
Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
Originally posted by: Max_Rebo
but probably not in PAL.
Are you looking for PAL? I don't think you'll find any PAL laserdisc with AC3 on it.


I know I won't find the 5.1 at PAL speed, but I'm going to put everything together as PAL and then convert to NTSC.


NTSC only? I'd like to get that PAL version before conversion, I've waited that someone would do these too, so thanks!


No there will be both PAL and NTSC versions, I'm in the UK so I will be watching the PAL versions.

I wasn't expecting quite so much interest in these, but I'm glad, hopefully it will live up to everyone's expectations.

Post
#308876
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
Originally posted by: Max_Rebo
but probably not in PAL. Are you looking for PAL? I don't think you'll find any PAL laserdisc with AC3 on it.


I know I won't find the 5.1 at PAL speed, but I'm going to put everything together as PAL and then convert to NTSC.

Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
I've got a trilogy of AC3 files which might be worthy of a closer inspection.
They're 384kbps, which doesn't prove anything, but IIRC that's the native rate for LD format which is a good sign at least.
OTOH they're 48kHz -- was native LD AC3 also 44.1 like PCM?
Check your PM.


Replied by PM.
Post
#308863
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Sluggo
3. Are the making of interviews that were on the VHS before the films available in widescreen? (I only ever had the P&S VHS)

No the interviews are pan and scan on the widescreen tapes as well.


thanks for letting me know, in that case I might do a capture from my VHS set (which are probably in a box somewhere) and include them as a special feature, providing it doesn't compramise the disc space too much. Although now I think about it I'm sure one of the discs i have round here has them on it but probably not in PAL.


Originally posted by: adywan
I have the 5.1 track from the laserdiscs but i haven't synced them to the 2004 ntsc dvd. it is still in 3 separate parts in uncompressed wav format but they are too big to post on rapidshare. the first 2 are about 1.5gb each and the 3rd part is 800mb. I was thinking about syncing it up to the dvds when i get a bit more time and creating a AC3 5.1 track that can be easily added to the SE


Hi Ady, have you got the 5.1 for all 3 films or just ANH? either way would you mind putting them on a DVD (or 3) and sticking them in the post? (I'm in the UK) even if it's just the for the one film it would save Karyudo some time.

Cheers
Post
#308815
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: Karyudo
Originally posted by: Max_Rebo
2. Is there any other source for a genuine 5.1 mix? (I know it's on the laserdiscs but is it on any of the bootlegs?)


Not sure I'd trust any bootleg, as getting the genuine 5.1 mix off the LDs was (is?) tricky. If you need the 5.1 off the LDs, lemme know. I've got all the equipment to do it.


yes please, that would be great.
Post
#308702
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Originally posted by: MoveAlong
You're going to have to deal with the different aspect ratio's of the two sets. I believe one of them is squashed down to 2.25:1, can't remember which one. In other words, one set has thicker black bars than the other. Some cropping and resizing will be necessary. Good luck...


Actually they are both squished (or at least appear so) because they are based off the same master (all the same dirt and scratches can be seen on them) the TB is 8 pixels higher than the GKAR but otherwise the aspect ratio, framing etc. is the same (except for the title crawl)

I think the aspect ratio can be easily fixed just by adding a bit of overscan to the sides, since the image size is 704x576 just adding 8 pixels to each side bringing it up to 720x 576 does a lot to sort it out, I need to compare it with the official dvd to see if it's close enough.

Obviously all this only applies to ESB, I'll have to wait and see with the others.


I'm glad there are other's who want these preserved, they were the first versions I had on video and it's how I remember first seeing Star Wars (but not Empire and Jedi, I had them on video taped off TV, and always enjoyed them despite having no knowledge of what happend in the first film!)

Post
#308620
Topic
Help: looking for... 1997 SE TB Digital Broadcasts
Time
Just to let everyone know I have started to put together a '97 SE superset', it had been my intention for some time but when I couldn't get my TB discs (kindly supplied by Darth Boman) to copy I gave up on it. However over the weekend I managed to rip the entire video from both the ANH and ESB TB discs (after many failed attempts it just suddenly worked, but they still wont copy!).

so rather than just re-author the TB set I though I would combine the best elements of the TB set and the GKAR set (which ripped without any problems) and make a best possible version.

I'm currently working on ESB, because that's the one that I got to rip first and it has no subtitles to worry about, and I have been surprised to find that the TB video is actually more detailed than the GKAR, but the TB has a few missing frames and glitches in the video. I'm not sure if this is also true of the other films but for ESB I can safely say that most of the video will be comming from the TB set.

You may have noticed that I haven't yet mentioned ROTJ that's because I haven't been able to get the TB disc to rip properly (it is visably more scratched/marked than the others), it's got to about 30% which is enough to cover the subtitled scenes but I want to have the full thing ripped before I start making decisions on that one.

A couple of questions for anyone who might know:
1. Is the english 5.1 track on teh GKAR set genuine or is it an upmix?
2. Is there any other source for a genuine 5.1 mix? (I know it's on the laserdiscs but is it on any of the bootlegs?)
3. Are the making of interviews that were on the VHS before the films available in widescreen? (I only ever had the P&S VHS)


I just want to say that this will not be a fast process as I'm a perfectionist and I'm really busy in the real world but I'm happy with my progress so far and I'll try and post an update at the weekend with some pictures showing the difference in quality between the two sets.
Post
#308002
Topic
Info &amp; Ideas: ESB and ROTJ Wishlist
Time
since when was a voice genetic? there is no reason Boba should sound anything like his father after 20+ years without his influence. There is no continuity error and no need for stupid explainations he just has a different voice. Plus the original voice sounds a lot better.

and personally I like the way he dies, there's nothing in the films to say he's 'the most amazing bounty hunter in the galaxy', he's just a bit better than the others or he got lucky.
Post
#307254
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time
On the subject of the arm again (I really don't want anyone to think I'm bitching about this, it's just got me thinking that's all) I've had another think about this and I'm now quite undecided, there's just a really odd sequence of events that lead up to this sequence being the way it is:

1. the script heavily implies and the novel outright states that it is the human's arm that is cut off with ponda baba and the little rat like thing both getting cut in half.

2. when shooting the scene it was decided that it would be ponda baba's arm that gets cut, and when you look at the footage from the lost cut which is framed differently and you can see more of what is going on, it is clear that the human's arm doesn't get cut (you can see it as he falls back) and ponda's arm is seen on the floor having been chopped off when obi-wan swung at both of them.

3. for some reason it was decided not to use the footage of ponda's arm and to use the hairy hand instead the only reasons I can see for this are either it didn't look right because the flipper couldn't hold a gun or they wanted it to appear to be the man's arm and just modified the existing prop and shot it when they were shooting the extra cantina footage.

But regardless of what the intention was at the time I think the final edit of the film makes more sense it it is the human's arm, perhaps they didn't make it look entirely human as they were worried about getting a PG rating, but I've also read somewhere (maybe T-bone's site) the hairy arm was meant to belong to the rat like creature who was originally scripted to get killed in that fight.

now I've thought about it some more I can see it from both angles but I think the real problem with the flipper is the question "how would he be able to pull the trigger?"

I think for me I'm still just on the side of going with the human arm, but this is Adywan's edit so it's his choice.


Also Adywan it's really cool to be in the credits of star wars, thanks for that.