logo Sign In

Lord Haseo

This user has been banned.

User Group
Banned Members
Join date
19-Apr-2013
Last activity
2-Oct-2017
Posts
4,841

Post History

Post
#926385
Topic
What is wrong with... <strong>Attack of the Clones</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

HansiG said:

Lord Haseo said:

Outside of 4chan and (as of now) a youtube comment section the internet should not be like that.

But it is

Well a lot of people do things and behave in a way that they shouldn’t. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be mad when offensive things are said and just shrug it off as “That’s how it is”. Definitely doesn’t mean we shouldn’t chastise people like that either.

Post
#926241
Topic
What is wrong with... <strong>Attack of the Clones</strong>? - a general discussion thread
Time

yotsuya said:

Lord Haseo said:

The only thing TFA lacks that the PT has is George’s wild imagination and world building skills. But as far as telling a competent story with likable/layered characters Lucas didn’t showcase any of the talent he once had when making the OT.

I think you have nailed why the PT is not as good as the OT. But I think that GL’s imagination is more important to the overall story than his ability to write characters which is why even though TFA has better character stories, I think it is a weaker film because the overall plot is unimaginative.

I can understand you saying that the OT is superior based on that but the PT? The PT had semi imaginative plots with piss poor execution and mostly had dull characters. And plus if you don’t care about your characters you won’t be too invested in the plot anyway.

Post
#926237
Topic
What do you <em>want</em> to happen in the the rest of the ST?
Time

Scott109 said:
Perhaps I need to watch the film a second time to give a more objective assessment.

You should see any film more than once. Just to reaffirm your position.

A storm trooper spontaneously deciding to leave the First Order and join the Resistance is equivalent to a member of Hitler Youth deciding to leave Nazi Germany and fight for the Allies. It is conceivable, but his motivation should have been explained better.

SilverWook said:

Finn wasn’t conditioned to be evil, (evil people seldom think what they are doing is “evil”) he was conditioned to be obedient, and fed First Order propaganda. Being ordered to slaughter innocents and seeing a fellow trooper die was a major shock to his system.

History is full of people who woke up and realized they were on the wrong side, and tried to do something about it.

They could have prolonged it but there was enough for Finn to defect. Especially since he was about to be reprimanded had he actually submitted his blaster for inspection.

Luke was only able to deflect the blasts of the seeker droid and blow up the Death Star as a result of Obi-Wan’s training. Even if Luke trained Rey as a child before Kylo Ren wiped her memory, she should not have been able to subconsciously remember how to perform a Jedi mind trick as her memory was wiped.

For one blast deflection takes time. More time than just a couple of minutes. And like stated before all Obi-Wan did was tell Luke to stretch out with his feelings and to not trust his eyes. Anyone could have told him that.

As it pertains to Rey if she had her mind wiped like Revan the teaching lying dormant in her mind could have been coming back to her.

If Kylo Ren massacred the New Jedi Order, why was he unable to defeat Rey?

This has been answered on at least one occasion and you’ve ignored it. Hopefully you won’t do so again.

  • He was shot by Chewie’s bowcaster which one shots everything in the film
  • He had his sword arm cut by Finn in their duel
  • He was weakened by the guilt of killing Han (hinted at by the film and confirmed in the novelization)
  • He most likely hasn’t had a serious lightsaber duel in over a decade
  • He hasn’t completed any of his training whether that be Jedi or Dark Side training

as an alternative we also have the fact that Rey could have had her mind wiped and is now reclaiming her suppressed skills.

Post
#926215
Topic
Star Wars: Rogue One - * Non Spoiler Discussion Thread *
Time

BmB said:

Lord Haseo said:
*Judging from the teaser, this could be way more interesting than TFA.

Fixed that for you.

How did that fix anything? The “judging from the trailer” part already made it a provisional statement. “Could” isn’t needed.

For one you can’t surmise the quality of a finished product just from a teaser trailer. And secondly the finished product could be not as good as the movie you’re comparing it to.

Post
#926205
Topic
What didn't you like about TFA? <em>SPOILERS</em>
Time

imperialscum said:
Main villain could have betrayed Luke just the same and Rey could later be trained by him just the same, if he was not missing/hiding in the first place (i.e., no “finding Luke” useless filler).

Well considering Rey goes off to find Luke at the end of the film and you’d have to alter the script a bit to account for that.

Also wouldn’t getting the Death Star plans to the rebels be considered as filler too? And aside from that the implications of finding Luke are different from finding a blueprint.

Post
#926198
Topic
What didn't you like about TFA? <em>SPOILERS</em>
Time

imperialscum said:
Remove Luke element from the film and replace map to his place with map/blueprint of the superweapon (which is film’s defacto focus anyway) and you have completely identical film.

They’re both mcguffins but unless that map/blueprint trained and was betrayed by our main villain and is presumably going to train our main protagonist I wouldn’t say they’re identical.

Post
#926192
Topic
What didn't you like about TFA? <em>SPOILERS</em>
Time

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

imperialscum said:
And that is pretty much all there is to it. In other words, almost nothing.

That’s all there needs to be. We were given the premise of the film in the opening crawl, most of the plot centered around finding Luke and he was found.

I’m still confused as to how the film has nothing to do with Luke’s plot element when the plot is about finding Luke. That doesn’t even make sense.

The film pretends that finding Luke is the main plot. In reality, it is just an empty filler to find together rather unrelated SW rehash elements.

Then why are most of the actions everyone does in the film related to finding the map to Luke?

Post
#926190
Topic
What do you <em>want</em> to happen in the the rest of the ST?
Time

pablumatic said:

With The Force Awakens mimicking the original Star Wars so much I’m not sure where else the story could go other than continue to copy the first three films.

That’s assuming Episodes VIII and IX will be soft remakes as well. Which is something we can’t assume considering how many people didn’t like how TFA was so similar to SW.

Kylo should have no redemption.

I agree wholeheartedly. Makes things more interesting

No more heroes getting their limbs cut off.

Well with Finn getting his back sliced up you may get your wish on that one. Hopefully they continue to experiment with new ways of harming/killing people with a lightsaber.

Post
#926189
Topic
What didn't you like about TFA? <em>SPOILERS</em>
Time

imperialscum said:
And that is pretty much all there is to it. In other words, almost nothing.

That’s all there needs to be. We were given the premise of the film in the opening crawl, most of the plot centered around finding Luke and he was found.

I’m still confused as to how the film has nothing to do with Luke’s plot element when the plot is about finding Luke. That doesn’t even make sense.