Lord Haseo

Double post

Neglify said:

Lord Haseo said:

I don’t know if there’s a sports thread but…May the Force/God/Whoever be with the Golden State Warriors. Also I hope we get some good crying Jordan pictures tonight.

Oh are you in the SF Bay Area? Born in SF myself.

Nah, I reside in Florida. Just a fan of Curry, Thompson and everyone else who I deem great. But I have never like Lebron though.

The budget for a live action Star Wars show would have to be immense to have the effects be compelling which is definitely doable. The real questions are:

1. Who should be writing the show?

2. Who should be casted in the show?

3. Who should direct the show?

4. When should this show take place in the timeline?

5. What should the tone of this show be?

6. Should the show be more action or character oriented?

These questions are what is going to make or break the show.

I don’t know if there’s a sports thread but…May the Force/God/Whoever be with the Golden State Warriors. Also I hope we get some good crying Jordan pictures tonight.

I guess he thinks anything that is even mildly racy is for immature people and that in of itself is an immature thought in my opinion. So long as the thing you’re watching has more to offer than just things of sexual nature then it’s fine if there it occasionally get’s racy.

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

I’m pretty sure Frink was just making fun of grown men who watch Dragon Ball Z. Y’all need to adopt a sense of humor.

There’s more to anime than just DBZ. There is actual anime that is geared towards adults and adults pretty much exclusively. Also the entirety of this conversation isn’t just aimed at Frink.

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Lord Haseo said:

And if someone said Star Wars (in general) was just for kids you would say…

That they’re wrong and Frink’s still right

Yes because one wild generalization is wrong while the other one is accurate. The hypocrisy in this fanbase is absolutely staggering.

And if someone said Star Wars (in general) was just for kids you would say…

ZkinandBonez said:

Lord Haseo said:

I wish they would produce a Star Wars show for adults. Preferably in the anime style rather than that dreadful CGI shit that’s in Rebels and TCW.

So essentially a TV-series based on this short film?;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PN_CP4SuoTU

Yes, have that art style with smoother animation and we’d have ourselves something great in terms of visuals. The more important aspects would be plot, characters and tone.

imperialscum said:
Tauntaun, for example.

That’s a good example I have forgotten about. Too bad that wasn’t the standard for the rest of the OT.

imperialscum said:

There should be no blood at lightsabre wound. When the lightsabre cuts the flesh, the wound should be cauterised. In that respect, ESB and ROTJ are correct and ANH is wrong.

They don’t show cauterized wounds in ESB and ROTJ though. That is something that was first introduced with the prequels.

Dek Rollins said:
This is exactly what should have happened in the ROTJ skiff/sail barge battle.

There should have been at least scorch marks on the people Luke was killing but instead we got a lightsaber which functioned as a glowing baseball bat. Then later in the film it actually acts like a lightsaber when it cuts off the front portion of a speeder and Vader’s hand.

Tyrphanax said:
Oh. I guess if by “adults” you mean “angsty teens”… no thanks.

Way to generalize man…

Gore…

Yeah, Return of the Jedi was really missing the rancor’s head bursting like a melon when the gate landed on it.

I was talking about stuff like this:

Is it weird I want Jaime and Cersi to be together? I didn’t really pop a boner when they made out but I was kind of happy to see them together again.

I wish they would produce a Star Wars show for adults. Preferably in the anime style rather than that dreadful CGI shit that’s in Rebels and TCW. Gore, complicated plot lines that deal with betrayal and political machinations, layered characters with their own arcs and backstories, philosophical discussions etc.

I dunno

Oh my god…I just died a little on this inside…Like I’m literally feeling chest pains right now.

BillionaireHobo287 said:
I only follow the canon of the seven Episodes/movies. It’s better that I deviate from the actual movie so that less possible spoilers occur.

You mean spoilers for TFA? If so then the statute of limitations are way past due on that.

Well, I do like the idea of bantering villains so I did that with the Knights of Ren. I don’t know how Hux could otherwise be an interesting character besides the banter, and my story has lots of arcs and subplots going on already.

Hux seems to be fanatical about the First Order so having him cling to those ideals while Kylo clings to his would make for a good spark for a schism.

Tyrphanax said:

Duh-nuh-nuh-nuhhhhhhhhhh.

Thank you very much

suspiciouscoffee said:
How can the meaning of life be a long-dead meme? Really, the meme died long ago. Find some fresher memes. Free yourself from the frog’s meme hell.

NEVER!

TV’s Frink said:

Lord Haseo said:

Yes, because giving people choices it a bad thing. Hey, next why don’t we disable avatars too because people will have to be subjected to see them plastered all over the place as well?

Slow down there buddy.

We had the option to keep people’s sig images to showing up for us. It affected you not one bit, unless you somehow think it’s critical I see your sig image.

Actually that sounds like a good idea. That gives people even more options 😄

Tyrphanax said:

You can chuck it to me and I’ll crop it if you want.

I didn’t go to university for six years for nothing!

Thank you in advance.

ray_afraid said:

I never told you what you can/can’t or should/shouldn’t have on your profile.

ray_afraid said:
How 'bout no pic at all since it adds nothing to you, but it’s something we all have to see plastered all over the place?

You serious?

And to be frank it’s not the message you’re trying to convey it’s the way you said it. The “How 'bout” makes you seem like an ass especially when there was literally no provocation that led to you saying that. Had you written it differently we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

ray_afraid said:

Lord Haseo said:

I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.

Meaning you’re really interested in why?
Look, I know you’re easily riled and I “shrugged” to say “no big deal either way”.
Continue with this fit if ya wanna. I truly couldn’t care any less.

I don’t care why you think the way you think. That’s why I omitted the shit in the first place. Also I’m so “riled” because do you see me going around commenting on the way people should dress, how their hair and body should look, what they should read, listen to, watch or what to do with their profile? No, I don’t. And if you didn’t truly care you wouldn’t have come at me like a demanding and entitled ass.

You did sound like a demanding ass. Taking out the other sentence doesn’t do anything to make your post seem any nicer. Plus that sentence is what I was directly responding to. I could give a fuck about why you can’t see why someone would have a picture in their signature.

Yes, because giving people choices it a bad thing. Hey, next why don’t we disable avatars too because people will have to be subjected to see them plastered all over the place as well?