logo Sign In

Knightmessenger

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Nov-2005
Last activity
23-Oct-2017
Posts
819
Web Site
http://www.youtube.com/user/Knightmessenger

Post History

Post
#239069
Topic
Where Does it Actually Say that the DVDs are *NOT* Anamorphic?!?
Time
I'm not sure about the menus. Certain dvd menus appear letterboxed on my computer screen but are 4:3 on a tv, even a widescreen one. Or is there something else you know about the menus.
What's sad is that it seems there are a lot of people at Lucasfilm who want the original films restored but "they must obey their master." Sansweet at the comic con basically admitted this when he said something about wanting to do something special for the fans (with what was to be individual releases of just the 2004 versions) and this is the most Lucas would permit.
The official site has screenshot comparisons of the '77/'04 versions. I know they're at a small size but the original screens look rather good against the new ones.
Post
#238803
Topic
So, this is how the DVDs are going to look...
Time
"The Star Wars restoration process began with a 10-bit RGB high-definition scan of the original negatives. This data was then used by a team at Lucasfilm and Industrial Light & Magic to work with George Lucas to do some significant color correction to the movies. This color-timed data was then transferred to Lowry Digital hard drives, to begin the massive clean-up effort."

So Lucas and ILM are to blame for the horrible colors. I guess Lowry did a good job removing scratches. But that is very stupid to do it that way. You get the highest quality scan, then you remove whatever picture flaws or dirt. The LAST thing to do is color correction. If you color correct a film covered in dirt, then wouldn't there be a risk of the color being oversaturated and unbalenced when the dirt is removed? Maybe that's what went wrong.
To see how Star Wars looked before THX, look at the official screenshots page for the Japanese Special Collection.
I hope the people who originally posted these shots don't mind me reposting them for comparison.

Film example
http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/f4a8af8c3b.jpg

dvd
http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/cfc1fd48d7.jpg

X0 newsletter (Judge it not by its size but by color & contrast)
http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/88ec861348.jpg

dvd
http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/1c5faef7a9.jpg
Post
#238184
Topic
Problem with slow motion in Vegas
Time
No, I mean I had rendered the avi file with the slow motion and it had looked good. The "before" is a reference to the screenshot which is from a rendered final avi video file. I burned that video file to a dvd.
The screenshot labeled "resample disabled" shows how it originally looked, without any interpolation. When I rendered the video together, the slow motion clip turned out to look like the "before" screen. Watching the dvd, I was happy with how that looked. About a year later, the same rendering process made the final edited avi file look like the "after" screen. Watching slow motion clips rendered since then has looked a lot worse.
Post
#238035
Topic
Star Wars isn't the only one...
Time
I believe the only difference between 1.1 and 1.2 is with gameshark codes. Would someone be able to make a complete uncompressed audio file of the original Fire Temple music. They would have to capture from the gold cartridge (or a 1.0 grey) but it isn't hard at all to get the music isolated.

Go to a place where there aren't background sounds. (This can be done in the first room if you kill the bat enemies and look in the right direction)
Play the song of Storms (this will restart the music from the beginning after the rain stops)
Before the music restarts, switch to first person mode (This will prevent Link from adjusting his equipment)
Capture and you have an isolated track!!
Post
#237673
Topic
Tell imdb.com to separate their rating system for theatrical and altered versions of movies.
Time
The "alternate versions" link just has a description. There is no way to give seperate ratings for each version of a film. I think it's a great idea. I'd love to see how each version of "Legend" rates. I gave it an 8 because I was voting for the director's cut.

Just saw these
http://www.imdb.com/poll/results/2006-05-11
http://www.imdb.com/poll/results/2005-09-23
http://www.imdb.com/poll/results/2004-12-21

Two polls dealt with which order to see all Star Wars movies and they were landslides for different results.
Post
#237663
Topic
Problem with slow motion in Vegas
Time
I believe it's less than half speed. It's not a round number as I just stretched the video as I saw fit. However, all the screencaps are at the same speed.

By the way, the problem I wrote about dropped frames, I think it's because some of the rough parts of the video are just too taxing on my computer's cpu. 90% of the time they occur at tape scratches or vcr edits with the fuzzy rainbow line. No drop if I record the tape to a dvd recorder, then capture from the dvd.

Here are smaller preview versions of the images that don't show the interlace lines.

Before
[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/b90438352f.jpg[/url]

After
[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/f8ae93e2f5.jpg[/url]

Resample Disabled
[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/7197415708.jpg[/url]
Post
#237166
Topic
Problem with slow motion in Vegas
Time
Lower field first. I believe deinterlace method is set to none. The thing is why is it interpolating more frames now (middle) than it was before (top)?

I've actually had that signature for a while. I first posted it under X0 logo design but I don't know how to make t-shirt designs. I guess it does leave the question, when will the EU book come out that lists what every clone order # does?
Post
#237023
Topic
Problem with slow motion in Vegas
Time
The interlacing is normal. But notice how the middle frame shows the player in more than two positions. That's why I put the other ones up for reference. I did try playing around with the interlace settings and that's actually when the trouble started. Don't know if their related though. The thing is the video is interlaced to begin with so encoding it progressive wouldn't help. I don't know how to properly de-interlace (not even those jpeg screencaps) and I've heard that it often makes the video worse unless you do it absolutely right.
Post
#237010
Topic
Been doing some thinking... OT box set
Time
I've been thinking the exact same thing. So in one respect, I belive the September release will be the only way to get the original movies by themselves. To do something like restore the movies and compile a ton of other footage for new documentaries of all six films will take a lot of time. Lucas just wants to stop bootlegs for the time being. But then again, if he were to say "The original movies will be restored and included in a 2007 box set," no one would be complaining. Most would say take your time and get it right. I think Lucas is doing the same thing as Blade Runner, but not disclosing it. Then again the '97 BR dvd is anamorphic.
Post
#237006
Topic
Star Wars isn't the only one...
Time
I love the sound the guards make though. I have the official soundtrack and the Fire Temple music fades out early before the chanting. It is only 42 seconds when the other temple music play for nearly 2 minutes. I just wanted to use an SAT word: truncated or should I have said hackneyed.

Here's what's really weird. I wanted to capture the N64 game to my computer and the capture device picked up no video or audio signal. The gamecube has always captured normally. I recorded some of the N64 game to a vhs tape and then tried to capture the tape. That didn't work either, no a/v signal. What's up with that? Why can I capture from the gamecube but not the N64?
Post
#236985
Topic
Problem with slow motion in Vegas
Time
before

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/d7696e77f2.jpg[/url]

after

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/39709e3e73.jpg[/url]

resample disabled

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/5ea9706bff.jpg[/url]

Although the first two shots are motion blurred, the second one looks a lot worse, especially in motion. The first one has a soft blur that looks natural for the slow motion but the second plays very jarring and garbled. These are from rendered avi files. The capture source is a vhs tape. As far as I know the vegas settings are the same so I don't know how the resampling got worse.
Post
#236983
Topic
Good capture card?
Time
[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/cd3a8df5b6.jpg[/url]

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/608d7b102f.jpg[/url]

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/c546bae96a.jpg[/url]

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/3105112d27.jpg[/url]

[url=http://www.uploadfile.info]http://www.uploadfile.info/uploads/939f87574e.jpg[/url]


If this works, see if you can guess which video camera format I used for all but the last one (it's from a different video camera). All used an s-video cable.