logo Sign In

Johnboy3434

User Group
Members
Join date
13-Dec-2006
Last activity
19-May-2013
Posts
407

Post History

Post
#325121
Topic
Do you feel like this: pre-1977 to 1983 is the real Star Wars Canon
Time
Fang Zei said:

Hey, it would be funny if Owen actually is Obi-Wan's brother anyway. It would be a really wierd coincidence, especially when we're talking in galactic terms, but it could work.

 

Until I came across the reference to the other Owen in the Jedi Apprentice series, I liked to pretend that, if only to give a bit more meaning to the line, "You were my brother, Anakin!" If the Kenobi-Lars relationship had been kept, they would have actually been stepbrothers. Unfortunately, Obi-Wan's family supposedly lived on a grassy planet and were fairly wealthy. Neither description fits the Lars family. Sucks, don't it?

Post
#325029
Topic
The best upgrade for a home theater?
Time

My granddad just recently came into a crapload of extra cash (no, no one died), and has decided to give his home theater a mega-sized upgrade. Since I'm the only one in the immediate family that's technically savvy (read: I can use the Internet), he asked me for some advice. I figured that I'd suggest the best technology available. This is what I plan to tell him so far:

1080p HDTV: Panasonic Viera TH-50PZ800U
7.1 Channel Sound System: Cambridge SoundWorks Newton MC650HD 5.1 Home Theater System + 2 MC650HD Speakers
Profile 2.0 BD/DVD Player: Panasonic DMP-BD50

Right now, he could get these for $6,400 (and that's without searching for a deal, which I'm sure we can find). Are these good choices? Does anybody have any suggestions?

Post
#324913
Topic
Do you feel like this: pre-1977 to 1983 is the real Star Wars Canon
Time
Ripplin said:

Now, can someone explain the Ben/Owen thing? Haha. I know they were brothers up until the SEs, right? And so in Episode II, Beru is just some little girl that can be seen playing outside Padme's house in a deleted scene, right? Then she grew up and married this Owen fella, who may or may not have any extra significance to the families/characters at all?

And good gravy, why is it that everyone ages so much and Padme seems to have barely aged? Heh.

Yes, the prequels confuse me.

 

Actually, the two girls playing outside Padmé's house are Ryoo and Pooja. Beru was also in AotC, as you may recall. Yes, Obi-Wan and Owen Lars are no longer brothers, but he DID have a brother named Owen, according to the Jedi Apprentice series.

Post
#324484
Topic
Do you feel like this: pre-1977 to 1983 is the real Star Wars Canon
Time
Akwat Kbrana said:

At least he actually delivered in ROTJ...

 

Well, for all the "eww, gross!" moments that came of it, I'd almost as soon he hadn't delivered on it and let the EU handle it like he did with Sifo-Dyas. Of course, back then, the EU wasn't the juggernaut that it is now, so it would have had people screaming "plot hole"*, even though it wouldn't be, etc.

 

*Off-topic mini-rant: It pisses me off to no end that every unanswered question in a story is called a plot hole. A plot hole is when pre-established facts and logic are contradicted without explanation. If said contradiction is explained, it becomes a retcon. An unanswered question (such as who the Other would be if it had not been Leia) would NOT be a plot hole. It would have simply been a plot point that went nowhere, or, more formally, a "plot cul-de-sac." Leia remembering her mother when Padmé died shortly after giving birth? Until it's explained, THAT is a plot hole. Sifo-Dyas and his connection to the Clone Army? Not a plothole, simply an unanswered question (that is, in fact, answered, if you're willing to look it up).

Post
#324417
Topic
Do you feel like this: pre-1977 to 1983 is the real Star Wars Canon
Time
Hunter6 said:


In the past year, My thoughts on Star Wars have been changing to this:

Everything from pre 1977 to 1983 is Canon to me
the classic versions of all three OT films, the deleted scenes from the classic versions of all three OT films, the novelizations of the classic versions of all three OT films, the radio dramas based on the classic versions of all three OT films and any material from this time span (the Expanded Universe and so on from pre 1977 to 1983). I also do not like using "Episode __" in the title of the movies. I call them Star Wars, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back and Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. Sometimes I call Star Wars by Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker.


Everything from 1984 to the future is Non-Canon to me
Star Wars been changed to Episode IV A New Hope, using "Episode __" in the title of the movies, The SE, The Prequel trilogy, The Thrawn trilogy, Caravan of Courage, The Battle for Endor, Star Wars: Droids, Star Wars: Ewoks, Star Wars: Clone Wars, Star Wars: The Clone Wars, The up coming live-action series, a future Sequel trilogy and every thing from 1984 to the future is for TF.N lovers and dumb-a**es.



Do Some people on this Site feel like this too ?

 

Well, as long as you don't use that logic in a SW debate, you should be fine.

Post
#324414
Topic
Just finished watching the '04 DVD version of Star Wars
Time
Mielr said:

The '04 DVDs sank the SEs to yet another depth by adding Hayden Christiansen to the finale of ROTJ, which to me, is one of the most inexcusable atrocities ever committed in the history of the moving image.

 

I know I'm going to regret asking, but here goes: why do you think it's such a crime? An unwanted change I can buy, but a crime? If it's because Shaw is dead, then I'm calling bullshit. In case you didn't notice, he's still in the unmasking scene. You know, the one appearance where he actually has to act. His entire performance is still in the movie, minus five seconds of standing and smiling. If anything, you should just count yourself lucky that Hayden didn't actually say anything. Seriously, of all the things to get riled up about, you choose this? What about Clive Revill? Not only was his entire performance cut out of the film, but he's still alive to see it. That's a much bigger insult than what happened to Shaw, and yet that's the one major change that most of the people around here seem to accept.

Post
#324065
Topic
An experiment in poor storytelling... *WARNING: High tolerance for bull**** required*
Time
skyjedi2005 said:

"An experiment in poor storylelling" is exactly what the star wars prequels and indiana jones IV were, LOL.

 

Maybe those movies can go back to "the space between the spaces" LOL.

 

Goddamn it, sky, that's enough. At this point, you're just looking for any and every opportunity to blast Lucas, whether the conversation calls for it or not. I would greatly appreciate it if you would leave this crap out of my thread. If anyone's writing is to be criticized here, it will be mine. Got it?

Post
#324062
Topic
An experiment in poor storytelling... *WARNING: High tolerance for bull**** required*
Time
Tiptup said:

You should combine more sc-fi and fantasy worlds and be less Potter-centric, but otherwise it sounds fun. Though I hope you're not totally apposed to "scantily-clad women" being in the story; they're nice.

 

The inspiration for this story (besides the joke it started out as) was the Kingdom Hearts series of video games. In that game, the main character (Sora) is constantly accompanied by Goofy and Donald Duck, even though he meets characters from plenty of other films. Now that I've got a plot in my head, I want the Potter kids to be the Mary Sue's Donald and Goofy, in that they're almost always with him. As such, they get a bit more character development than the rest of the cast. Besides, it won't be Potter-centric in the usual sense, because Hogwarts is a huge crater by the end of the first act, and the Mary Sue's personal conflicts take center-stage for most of the story. There will be character arcs from other franchises, though. Don't worry. Oh, and as for scantily-clad women, there will be some sexual content, but nothing R-rated, since it's my experience that the written word is only truly arousing if there's some really heavy stuff going on, and I don't want to have to put a disclaimer on my fic.

Oh, and as I implied, the basic plotline is finished, and I am in the process of typing it up. This may take a few days (I've got a load of homework), but I'll post it when I'm through.

Post
#323974
Topic
An experiment in poor storytelling... *WARNING: High tolerance for bull**** required*
Time

So I was frequenting the Star Wars board on GameFAQs when a joke topic came up about bringing all the characters from both trilogies together for Episode 7, 8, and 9 through several ridiculous plot devices. To continue the joke, I posted the following:

 

I've got a better idea: Sauron crosses the dimensional barrier and teams up with Sidious and Voldemort. Meanwhile Agent Smith hijacks a spaceship and spreads his copies across the universe. In order to stop these deadly menaces, Harry Potter and his friends must learn martial arts and the chi manipulation from the cast of Dragon Ball Z. After digging up and magically repairing the Power Coins, Harry, Hermione, Ginny, Ron, and Draco become the next generation of Power Rangers. In the climax of the story, Sauron recruits the Heartless and send them to destroy Disney Castle while Sidious leads a droid attack on Coruscant. Voldemort grows to gigantic size and fights the Megazord while Zion's operators desperately search for Smith's kill code. The Z Fighters launch an attack on Sauron's stronghold in an attempt to cut off his bid for power at the source.

That's it. I have just summarized the perfect fanfic. I'll be holed up in my room typing for the next few months if anyone needs me.

 

Then, the more I thought about it, the more I liked the idea. Obviously, no one could ever take a plot like this seriously (or at least I couldn't), so the thought came to me: why not make a fanfic that's basically one big, veiled meta-reference to the clichés fanfiction writers usually doll out? Like Scream, but for fanfiction instead of slasher films: a fic that exists simply for people to read and laugh at, but makes few overt jokes about its nature and instead takes itself far too seriously. It will be well-written (grammar- and spelling-wise, I mean), with characters from a myriad of franchises thrown together in a plot that, while plausible within it's own system of physics, would seem completely over-the-top in terms of storytelling merit. I came up with a list of the big clichés that I wanted to include, and posted this to GameFAQs:

 

The most obvious of these clichés will be the crossover, which will be more horrifically bloated than any serious attempt that has ever been made (except, perhaps, for the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen; that comic is ****ing insane). After that, we'll have the bad-guy-that-turns-good-simply-because-the-author-doesn't-want-to-kill-him, which will come in two varieties: the sincere-change-of-heart in the form of Draco Malfoy, whose romantic feelings for Hermione Granger will come to light when he discovers his father sealed them in a pensieve for "his own good" (consequently offering a nice helping of teenage angst), and the badass-who's-only-doing-this-because-his-life-is-on-the-line in the form of Agent Smith, who is forced to help our heroes when they discover his killcode and threaten him continuously with it, not unlike a dog with a shock collar.

We then have the contrived circumstances for our heroes to jump through hoops in order to learn skills they quite honestly would never need, this being the Hogwarts kids receiving physical training from the Z Fighters when magic would serve them perfectly well against any opponent... except the one they happen to be facing (Sauron, whom I will retcon as the undisputed master of all forms of magic; although I claim justification from the fact that one of his numerous nicknames translates as The Wizard). We'll have the washed-up villain who always comes back purely to annoy the heroes and is never a real threat in the form of Voldemort, who more or less withers in the company of the considerably more badass Sidious and Sauron. The running gag with this is that Sauron will continually resurrect Voldemort using necromancy simply so he can see how he'll screw it up next time. This actually stems from my own frustration with the character as written by Rowling, who seems incapable of doing anything right despite monumental advantages (i.e., teenage opponents, a cult of thousands of bloodthirsty wizards who hang on his every word, and control of pretty much the entire British Isles by the time Deathly Hallows comes around). He's like the slightly more sophisticated version of Team Rocket. So... a Bond villain, essentially, but minus the scantily-clad women (except for Bellatrix, rowr). [Hindsight Note: I realize that I overstate Voldemort's incompetence by a wide margin. Part of this is due to comedic hyperbole, the other due to the fact that I despise any and all protagonists under the age of 21 and fail to see why the most powerful Dark Wizard of all time could possibly have any trouble hunting down and killing a bunch of kids when he knows where they live.]

 

Then we have the obligatory aging of the characters over the course of the story to give the illusion of character development (i.e., the fact that they are older implies that they are wiser, without the author having to provide evidence to support such a conclusion). They will essentially act the same as they did when they were 15 even though the characters may be 30+ and have children of their own. This will be more or less personified in the character of Pansy Parkinson, who, feeling cheated when Draco and Hermione got all friendly-like (and when he unceremoniously drops her like a diseased fish), will go on an adolescent spree of revenge during the entire narrative (Hell hath no fury, etc.). The vendetta grows more and more obsessive to the point that, by the end of her character arc, her inability to move on ceases to become amusing and jumps into the realm of genuinely disturbing, even to the other villains.

Then, we get to the mother of all fanfiction clichés. The mere mention of it's name strikes fear into the hearts of readers everywhere. It is: THE MARY SUE!!!! *lightning strike, blood-curdling scream, etc.* But not just any Mary Sue, it's an ANTI-SUE! And not just any anti-Sue, it's an ANTI-SUE TRYING TO BE A MARY SUE! A character with genuinely good intentions, but several personality flaws, kind of like... a realistic character. Wait a minute. I did something wrong. I'll get back to you on this one.

 

I'm in the process of ironing out a plot to fit these tropes together in a cohesive manner. If anyone is finished, I'll post an summary once I'm satisfied with it. Just thought I'd share this potential project with everyone.

Post
#322930
Topic
RIP George Carlin
Time

I have mixed feelings about Phelps. On one hand, he's a near-constant source of entertainment. On the other, the bastard claims to belong to the same religion as me. Now if only his followers would start blowing themselves up in public places, I might be able to identify with the average Muslim. I'm not sure if that would be a good thing or not, to tell the truth.

Post
#322929
Topic
Mark Hamill endorses Barack Obama....
Time
lordjedi said:

One of his latest policy outlines is requiring community service in order to graduate high school and college.

 

The bastard. Why doesn't anyone realize that by making people help the community, you only inspire resentment towards the community? Think of it this way: would you live in an apartment building where you not only have to pay rent, but also wash your landlord's feet everyday? Would that endear him to you? No! You'd high-tail it out of there as quickly as possible. Unfortunately, in this case the entire country is an apartment building, meaning the only way to escape it is to jump the border and get a degree in Mexico or something. Who here wants our kids doing things like that?

Post
#322078
Topic
Robert A. Harris on Film Grain and Blu-Ray
Time
zombie84 said:

But why should your preference dictate how everyone sees it, or how the art, irrespective of ANYONE'S preference, should be presented.

 

That road runs both ways. Why should I be forced to look at those unsightly brush strokes and grainy pictures just because "they need no improvement". And there's a obvious difference between editing the presentation of a piece of art (removing grain and brushstrokes) and editing the content of it (adding Pikachu to Laurence of Arabia).

Post
#322025
Topic
Robert A. Harris on Film Grain and Blu-Ray
Time
zombie84 said:

But not respect for what the art actually is, nor the way it was made, nor the way the artists, regardless of intention, actually made it. And thats the point. Your opionion on what looks better means fuck all because thats not what the argument is even about, its about respecting the historical truth of the way the work was made.

 

It is the Mona Lisa, and after removing brush strokes and the like, it will still be the Mona Lisa. I believe intent is far more important than reality when it comes to art, especially when it's the creator's intent. If you want to respect the historical truth, then keep a written record of what it was like. Or take a fucking picture before the changes are made. Or release a low quality version of the original as a bonus to the revised version.

Post
#322020
Topic
Robert A. Harris on Film Grain and Blu-Ray
Time
ChainsawAsh said:

But if it wasn't made that way, it wouldn't be there at all, now would it?

 

So a piece of art is worthless if it isn't kept exactly the way it was made to begin with? Rubbish. Everything can be improved. We can only fight about what qualifies as "improvement". I think grain removal is an improvement. You do not. Such is the nature of aesthetics.

Post
#322011
Topic
Robert A. Harris on Film Grain and Blu-Ray
Time
zombie84 said:

Would you like to have all "artifacts" (ie lines of paint, uneven quality to the layers applied, and visible and semi-visible brushstrokes) in every painting ever made to be erased too?

 

Sure. Why not? If it makes the objects in the picture more prominent (as opposed to the stuff that's only there because of the way it was made) then I'm all for it.

 

Post
#321998
Topic
Robert A. Harris on Film Grain and Blu-Ray
Time
ChainsawAsh said:

You say that like it's a good thing.

 

I think it is. Obviously, a lot of the posters here may disagree, but I'd prefer a mere simulation of what it would look like without grain to a picture with a bunch of artifacts that are nothing more than an unavoidable side-effect of film-making. That said, I want the process of removing such artifacts to extend beyond merely blurring the image. It only looks good to me when it's been done by frame by frame, practically by hand, like the OT DVDs. Unfortunately, that's incredibly expensive and time-consuming, so we often end up with what Harris describes. Sucks, but that's life for you.

Post
#321432
Topic
Robert Harris Godfather Restoration WHY cannot lucas restore the oot ?
Time
generalfrevious said:

It's all too obvious why George Lucas doesn't want to restore the OOT. He created the OOT, in spite of his nonexistent and derivative talent, to create something that became part of the national consciousness- and then deliberately raze it all to the ground in making money off the only thing he chose to make for the rest of his pathetic directorial career. The treatment of the OOT proves that Lucas is a sadistic monster who wanted to throw millions into a mindless delusion that he is a great director and place the people who cared about the OOT into a state of absolute despair that can only lead to the absolute loss faith in anything, material or spiritual. And now it is inevitable that he has ruined another franchise with KOTCS, as we watched this franchise crash and burn into dust. I'd rather exist in a universe where Lucas and SW never, ever existed than live in this world.


For everyone with a short attention span, allow me to translate: "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!" God in Heaven, grow up! So you won't get to see a crystal clear transfer of your favorite version of a particular set of movies. Meanwhile, families in Somalia wonder if they'll eat tomorrow. Cry me a fucking river.