logo Sign In

JediSage

User Group
Members
Join date
22-Mar-2005
Last activity
10-Jan-2011
Posts
2,109

Post History

Post
#126093
Topic
Comics Fans
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
MMMmmm Hmmm.

JLA Year One had me spoiled I guess. Batman "The Long Halloween" is also a great arc if your interested in more of The Dark Knight.

And can someone explain why, if DKR takes place in the near future, WHY Reagan is still president and why the USSR still exists?


I've never understood why he used Reagan, but I do understand the U.S.S.R.; keep in mind that it was written around 1985, I believe, and at the time there was no end in site to the Cold War.

Have you read DK2? Many people didn't like it, but I did. I especially loved Miller's take on the relativists: Braniac's destroying everthing, some geek goes on TV and starts talking about how we can't make value judgements about the bad guys, then he says "Excuse me? Why yes, I'm from San Francisco, why do you ask?". LOL
Post
#124879
Topic
Martial Arts
Time
I did a lot of reading on Bruce Lee and Jeet Kun Do, and also have "The Tao of Jeet Kun Do". I've never studied formally, but have always been a believer in the art of "whatever works best". If you lock yourself into a particular style someone with adequate knowledge can eat you alive.

Also, in this day and age, in actual fights, outside of a dojo, people have a tendency to not play by the rules. Too many people carry weapons, and Lee said it best, "...against somebody with a weapon, you are at a disadvantage". Best defense is to not get into a fight, at all costs.
Post
#124376
Topic
BSG
Time
Originally posted by: starkiller
One of my hopes about the series has been revealed...

SciFi Wire
Galactica Will Encounter Pegasus

David Eick, co-creator and executive producer of SCI FI Channel's original series Battlestar Galactica, offered SCI FI Wire a few more details about the introduction of the Battlestar Pegasus, a returning element from the original series, which co-creator Ronald D. Moore revealed in a panel at Comic-Con International in San Diego. "This really came out of a conversation Ron and I had early on about the episodes we had seen of the original show and what felt like they might be well served by a fresh interpretation," Eick said in an interview. He added: "The storyline that we thought was interesting was the Battlestar Pegasus. And so, naturally, we put a pretty unexpected and, I think, pretty subversive spin on it. But it's definitely going to be a fixture for a while." The Pegasus appears beginning in the 10th episode of the second season.

The arrival of the Pegasus will launch a complex story arc inspired by current events, Eick said. "It stands to reason that in a show that's all about how we're all trying to survive this horrific attack by this inhuman enemy, that the thing that we're really exploring is not that threat from without, but how it turns itself inward and how it becomes insidious and internal, and how it begins to break us down from inside ourselves," he said. "And what better way to take that idea to the next level than to introduce another human being who, on the face of it, is going to help us defeat the Cylons, defeat that third outside enemy, once and for all, but in reality serves to only remind us once again that the biggest enemy is really us?"

Eick also hinted that the Pegasus will be involved in a multi-episode arc, though its crew may not be around as long. "It's not going to go away as quickly as people might think," he said. "That's not to say that the folks involved in bringing the Pegasus to us are going to remain indefinitely. But for sure it's going to be a fixture for some time." Battlestar Galactica airs Fridays at 10 p.m. ET/PT.
A while ago, I said I hoped they would "copy" just one or two of the original series episodes. I think I actually mentioned the Pegasus episodes in particular.

So, I'm happy to see the Pegasus showing up. I have no touble it will turn out different, but at least its there.

Now...can I get Gun on Ice Planet Zero??


All I want is Lucifer...hear that foppish "By your command!!"
Post
#124322
Topic
Comics Fans
Time
Originally posted by: Nanner Split
I'd have to say my current favorite graphic novel is Grant Morrison's "Arkham Asylum", but then again, I've only made it to Volume 2 of Sin City and plan to remedy that very soon.

Has anyone else here ever read "Arkham Asylum" or "The Killing Joke"? Both are awesome Batman books, and "AA" is actually kind of creepy in some parts.


I read Killing Joke many moons ago. I preffered it to Arkham, and thought it sported some of the best Batman/Joker artwork I've ever seen. How about Batman: Digital Justice? It was done using all computer generated art back around 87, which was a biiiig deal back then, and took place way in the future, with a different Batman who "inherits" Wayne's mantle.

Post
#124386
Topic
Quotes I Like
Time
This week's "Leftmedia Buster" Award: "Not much has changed since the mid-1980s. Substitute 'insurgent' for 'Sandinista,' 'Iraq' for 'Soviet Union,' 'Bush' for 'Reagan' and 'war on terror' for 'Cold War,' and the stories need little editing. The U.S. is 'bad,' our enemies 'understandable' if not downright 'good.' ... When's the last time you read a story about the progress being made on the power grid [in Iraq]? Or the new desalination plant that just came on-line, or the school that just opened, or the Iraqi policeman who died doing something heroic? No, to judge by the dispatches, all the Iraqis do is stand outside markets and government buildings waiting to be blown up. ... And reporters wonder why they're despised." --Mark Yost, St. Paul, Minnesota Pioneer Press
Post
#124120
Topic
BSG
Time
Originally posted by: greencapt
***comments on spoilers with spoilers about the spoilers***











Originally posted by: JediSage

I am disappointed to see that the colonial fleet has adopted the Independence Day practice of recruiting barely functional alcoholics for important positions in it's heirarchy. Give me a break.


I understand what you're saying, but I don't see it quite like that. ID4 had a drunk Nam vet who pitched in when there wasn't any other help (essentially); good or bad it made some sense within the context of the movie.

The BSG premiere though showed, through not the best use of 'young age' makeup, a wartime friendship that took two different directions. While basic soldiers the two were best buds, one optimistic and one not so much so. Some time later Adama, the optimist, reached his goals while his friend had dropped out (or been run out) of the service due to his alcoholism and mental breakdown. When re-instated by Adama, what *I* took out of it was that Adama, despite the possibly better judgment of everyone else, decided that his friend had something worthwhile and despite the odds he wanted to save him from himself. And by that time of the series (the flashback) the Cylon threat was a thing of the past and the army was moving towards being disbanded basically.


I just want to see some three way babe smack-down action between Boomer, Starbuck, and 6. Meee-oooow!! See the fur fly. Saucer of milk, table 12...

Post
#123945
Topic
BSG
Time
Thought it was slow moving, but well done overall. Next week's episode looks FANTASTIC.

****Spoiler Ahead****









I am disappointed to see that the colonial fleet has adopted the Independence Day practice of recruiting barely functional alcoholics for important positions in it's heirarchy. Give me a break.
Post
#122552
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
Originally posted by: Shimraa
athesist dont care thou warbler, for the most part if there is a prayer they will just stand there and think to themselves or something.


Exactly. Nobody is FORCING the an athiest to pray. If one doesn't want to pray, he/she can just standthere until it's over.


Actually I wouldn't even go that far. Nobody should have to even stand, if they wish.

I hate...Going off topic!!!!
Post
#122551
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Warbler
Originally posted by: JediSage

No argument. But this is far from your original comment. You originally said you cannot have freedom of religion without freedom from religion, which on the surface implies that all semblances of religion in public must be eliminated. Not quite the same as saying that one should have the right to choose none at all.


Freedom from religion simples means that one is not forces to choose to practice a relgion. And it means that the government must be free of religion. This is different from saying that all semblance of relgion in public must be eliminated.


This brings us back to my original point. The ACLU, with the tacit approval of the US government (via taxpayer funding) is relentlessly attacking towns, cities, states, courts, schools, etc...forcing them to remove any and all religious symbols, to deny employees the right to read the bible or pray on their own time, the list goes on and on. That is the big difference. In it's effort to embrace neutrality, it has instead embraced hostility. In the absence of a supreme power, the ultimate arbiter of right and wrong is the state.


Originally posted by: JediSage


Again no argument, however, the "Supreme" Court has ruled that saying a religion neutral prayer before a football game on school grounds is unconstitutional, somehow construing this to mean that the person saying it is really congress and that this act constituted establishment of a nation-wide religion. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...". A student body is NOT congress.


Just how in the world can you have a religion neutral prayer? Any prayer is not neutral to an Athiest. While a student body is not congress, if a prayer done as part of an offically sanctioned event at a school fuction, it the equivalent of the government supporting a specific religion over others or religion in general over nonreligion.


"To an unknown God..." please help our team win this game

How's that?

Again, taking the "establishment" clause and reading it as it is written, not "interpreted", the school(s) in question are NOT congress acting to establish a religion. No agency or person has the right to say that they may not pray before the game. How do we go from "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion" to "Schools, government employees, Boy Scouts, the military...etc cannot pray or read the bible, or hand out tracts, or wear religious jewelry...."?
Post
#122548
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
ok so in the quran it states that all whoa re not muslims are infidels and it probably also has a lot of other antisematic talk about christians. so i were to go on to a church on easter, or christmas eve and stated that christians are infidels, and that they need to change there beleives or die in hell. what would happen to me. this guy quoted a very hateful quote from the bible of all the weeks of the year on GAY PRIDE WEEK, in responce to gay pride. i'd say the guy deserved what he got for sheer stupidity, what did he think would happen. and the guy wasnt arrested, he was fined, big difference, that quote was indeed hateful. how would you feel if i said to you that your chirstian you should be beheaded in repayment for all the crimes that christians did in the cursades and all throughtout history, you wouldnt like it, nor would a gay person. and the court is not saying that the bible is hateful he says the quote was hateful, again big difference. it just shows how when christians over react whenever one thing goes wrong in there favour.

and ill remind you, everyone has freedom of religion, however no one has the freedom to persicute and infringe on the rights of other people. which is what was done when the guy printed those verses.


There can be no discourse on the subject so long as one side of the argument can be silenced with the help of the police power of government. A government/people cannot make the claim of being tolerant while intimidating those who would disagree. If they silence those who disagree on the basis of their religious beliefs, how long until they silence those who just say "homosexuality is wrong"? Does a person's right to speak get suspended during gay pride week?

In response to your question of beheading, I'd say no surprise. It's been hundreds of years and the left still screams "CRUSADES!!" in response to anyone who dares raise a moral or religious issue in a public forum the same way they scream "McCarthyism!!" when someone points out a socialist voting record. Of course most people still don't "get" that the Crusades were in response to a Muslim invasion of Europe.

A fine is a punishment for something for which you've been arrested. If I get a speeding ticket, I've been arrested for speeding. It doesn't matter how miniscule the crime or punishment is.

I suggest you take a look at your own response when accusing someone of overreacting, and your reply about the bible/Christians being hateful is dripping with hypocrisy.
Post
#122459
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Shimraa
Originally posted by: JediSage
Originally posted by: Shimraa
and i just like to add that athiests dont try to convert people of religion to not believe in god, however it is the opposite with religions. so by chooseing a stance that infringes on peoples rights the least would indeed been the best choice.


Wow...that sounds quite...totalitarian. Wasn't someone arrested in Canada for quoting a verse in the bible regarding homosexuality? Very...tolerant.


when was that.



Article