logo Sign In

JawsTDS

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Jun-2011
Last activity
23-Jun-2024
Posts
631
Web Site
https://www.cartycinema.com/

Post History

Post
#1022412
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Just got back from my second viewing.

First off: neither showings I’ve been to (in 3D and 2D) have been remotely in focus. I could get used to it for a while, but whenever a subtitle would appear, I’d remember that the projector is out of focus and notice how “blurry” everything is. Every time I’ve tried to see a Star Wars film in theaters, something always goes wrong.

…another strange point - the LucasFilm logo and “A long time ago…” visuals appear much smaller than in TFA. It doesn’t make a lick of difference, but it’s just something that caught me upon both viewings.

Now to the main point…

It’s much better the second time around. You get a better feel for the style and the story, and nothing is as confusing as going in blind. I actually knew why each little thing was happening, and finally caught the final shot Tantive IV going into hyperspace. The first time I saw RO, I blinked and then the film was over! If you had any doubts after your first viewing, give it another shot. It’s worth it.

As stated by everyone else, Donnie Yen steals the show. He is the best part about this film, along with Alan Tudyk’s droid. The CG was also far superior than that in TFA – I actually mistook the Star Destroyer’s for actual models… and if no one had informed me of Tarkin’s CGI recreation, I wouldn’t have even thought twice. Great effort on ILM’s behalf.

My main question, after finally seeing the film twice is: did anyone catch a “Wilhelm scream” hidden in the sound mix?

Post
#1019658
Topic
Thomas &amp; Friends - Classic Series NTSC Preservation (US dub) (a WIP)
Time

MKtheinstrumentalist said:

Question: for S1-2, are you using the Original, Restored, or Remastered footage cuts? (I think there were three but I may be wrong and there’s just two, I can’t remember anymore XD) Only because the footage is cropped COMPLETELY differently on a few episodes, most notably The Flying Kipper - almost very shot in the restored version is cropped nearly two inches lower on pretty much every shot compared to the original, which really ruins a few of the scenes, not least the famous crash scene… Here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcclK85EX9I

I’m going to be using the PAL restored DVD files for the main video source. I will later mux the original analog masters to the audio, so you can have both sets with the remastered US narration.

Post
#1018646
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

DominicCobb said:

JawsTDS said:
And to top it off, it was missing the hallmark wipes / dissolves from the original saga.

This is, however, untrue.

I should’ve clarified. There are wipes / dissolves, but they’re of a much different type (i.e smoke dissolve from Finalizer to Jakku). It’s nice to see a new twist on that aspect, but you know… fans are never happy.

Post
#1018563
Topic
Star Wars: Rogue One - * Non Spoiler Discussion Thread *
Time

joefavs said:

Ideally they run a teaser with Rogue One, but I’m trying not to get greedy.

I’m under this assumption as well. Fingers crossed!

Is there anyone who’s theater is ONLY showing RO in 3D on 12/16? Friday night at my local cinema in NJ only has the film in RealD 3D. Every other night has a 2D showing, which means I’m gonna have to see it in 3D – it’s a fun gimmick, but would seem distracting with Star Wars.

Post
#1018559
Topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Time

Am I the only one who was irked with the cinematography in the film? Certain shots felt very awkwardly framed and placed, and the use of ‘dutch angles’ and ‘whip pans’ was incredibly annoying. Nothing I saw on the screen felt reminiscent of the camera work done on OT nor the PT, which I believe shared mostly similar visual traits. It felt too “flashy”, as did most of the effects in the film. And to top it off, it was missing the hallmark wipes / dissolves from the original saga.

I still love the film, but certain elements about it really bug me…

Post
#1015639
Topic
Info: STAR WARS - Magic Bullet Grades
Time

NeverarGreat said:

The yellows are a bit green, and the skin tones seem a bit desaturated, though that’s more a matter of personal preference.

That may be due to the slight hue shift I applied – will try and amend that to see if it helps. Thanks for your input.

Question for anyone who takes a look at these – do the whites seem clipped or blacks crushed? I wasn’t sure how far to boost the shadow / highlight curves – clearly the Blu-ray was too dark, so I tried my damnedest to correct it without blowing the picture out.

Post
#1013710
Topic
Info: STAR WARS - Magic Bullet Grades
Time

-edit- bad link

Here is my corrected opening of A NEW HOPE. I believe the highlights and shadows have been adjust correctly. However, I did remove most of the green bias in the film, which is fairly prevalent in the theatrical grading. It should be noted I’m not going for theatrical accuracy, rather, closer to the '97 SE.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1-W6ByLSZVKSnVVbVd1M0FkZDQ

Post
#1013418
Topic
Feedback Wanted: my ColorMatch LUT Sharing
Time

Just applied it, looks very nice, fixes a lot of issues I could never work around in Vegas. Great stuff! My only gripe, and this just might be only on my end, is that the highlights look a bit too bright. However, this may be merely how my screens are ‘calibrated’, so take it with a grain of salt.

But seriously, these luts are incredibly helpful!