logo Sign In

Jar Jar Bricks

User Group
Members
Join date
15-Jun-2019
Last activity
29-Aug-2025
Posts
2,937

Post History

Post
#1408099
Topic
Star Wars: <strong>The Rise Of Skywalker</strong> Redux Ideas thread
Time

Movies Remastered said:

Jar Jar Bricks said:

Movies Remastered said:

TestingOutTheTest said:

The profit-making shit show that is Fixing Disney Star Wars

Dude, let it go! You have no idea how much they’re spending on each project nor how much is being donated. Non profile doesn’t mean designers/vfx artists/voice actors works for free. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Who ever it was used EbSynth from what I recall.

Yes, it’s true that there isn’t necessarily any profit-making involved. However, that still doesn’t give them the right to collect funds to create content based upon intellectual property that isn’t their own. Star Wars Theory funded his fan film entirely through his own funds, and he didn’t restrict access to seeing his work based upon whether you are paying him directly or not. If the Fixing Disney Star Wars team had a Patreon, and simply posted their content for everyone to see on YouTube while saying, “Hey, if you like us, feel free to support us financially through donations” then it wouldn’t be a problem. It becomes a problem when the content itself (which isn’t their property even if they create it) is an incentive to supply funding. Yes, it sucks to have to spend that much money on stuff, but they aren’t being forced to do any of that work. It should be coming solely from their ambition as fans of the franchise.

You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Star wars theory funds his films with donations and YouTube money. He even says “without you guys these fan films wouldn’t be possible”. It’s kinda boring having the same argument on different threads so I’ll leave it there.

No you don’t know what you’re talking about. I clearly made that distinction in my argument. I have no qualms with donations. The problem comes when you restrict access to content that isn’t intellectually yours based upon whether you donated or not.

Their team literally just said that for 2 months the only way you will be able to see their fan edit is if you pay them via SubscribeStar. If that isn’t illegal then I don’t know what is.

Post
#1408028
Topic
Star Wars: <strong>The Rise Of Skywalker</strong> Redux Ideas thread
Time

Movies Remastered said:

TestingOutTheTest said:

The profit-making shit show that is Fixing Disney Star Wars

Dude, let it go! You have no idea how much they’re spending on each project nor how much is being donated. Non profile doesn’t mean designers/vfx artists/voice actors works for free. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Who ever it was used EbSynth from what I recall.

Yes, it’s true that there isn’t necessarily any profit-making involved. However, that still doesn’t give them the right to collect funds to create content based upon intellectual property that isn’t their own. Star Wars Theory funded his fan film entirely through his own funds, and he didn’t restrict access to seeing his work based upon whether you are paying him directly or not. If the Fixing Disney Star Wars team had a Patreon, and simply posted their content for everyone to see on YouTube while saying, “Hey, if you like us, feel free to support us financially through donations” then it wouldn’t be a problem. It becomes a problem when the content itself (which isn’t their property even if they create it) is an incentive to supply funding. Yes, it sucks to have to spend that much money on stuff, but they aren’t being forced to do any of that work. It should be coming solely from their ambition as fans of the franchise.

Post
#1407814
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

Octorox said:

Honestly, I’m not so sure about the castle shot either. It still looks too obvious that it was ripped from Rogue One for me.

I just watched the scene in Rogue One which it is ripped from and it legitimately took me an entire minute to realize where we ripped it from in the landing sequence. IMO the color difference, reversal, and mirroring of the image make it look completely original.

Post
#1407809
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

JakeRyan17 said:

In the topic of switching up the trees, would it be possible to re-colour the trees from Mandalorian: The Jedi? Is there a shot in there that could be laid underneath the TIEs?

I just took a peek at the episode and I’m pretty sure that every aerial shot has Mando’s ship in it so it would have to be edited out. Additionally, the camera is really low to the ground (like below the trees kinda low). Not sure that it would work.

Post
#1407536
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

hinventon said:

That’s nice, if someone could take that and animate some TIES over it it might look great with the forest shot we have already.

As I said, the shot actually has Kylo’s ship flying across the screen. Also that watermark is stuck there, for now.

Additionally, there is the concern of legality. I’m fairly certain that since the CGI was commissioned, by all rights that video belongs to the Fixing Disney Star Wars team. We would have to communicate with them or settle some sort of deal in order to use it.

Post
#1407527
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

ziggyonice said:

Jar Jar Bricks said:

https://youtu.be/b1Xf24aX-kk
So apparently that animation is already finished, too. By Petrovelly (says so in description). But only viewable on their SubscribeStar. Doubt they are willing to share it, either.
IMO just kinda sucks that this fan editing community’s manpower is being divided because the Fixing Disney Star Wars team is using financial contributions.
EDIT: I realize they likely wouldn’t be able to create that Mustafar shot without that money, but it still seems kinda scummy imo.

I signed up just to see that clip. I applaud them for the effort, but rest assured that what we have looks better.

If you want to see it, PM me.

Alright so I agree to a certain extent that the second shot doesn’t look completely movie quality. Additionally, there is no forest anywhere in that shot by the castle, which makes no sense. And I think it would have been better to use the TIES instead of Kylo’s ship.

I did enjoy their version of the castle in ruins, though. And they did say it was only 90% done so who knows if that second shot would improve.

Post
#1407386
Topic
Revenge of the Sith - Expanded Edition (v2 Now Released!)
Time

Jar Jar Bricks said:

Just want to point out that there is a small audio issue on the latest version of the edit. Right before Palpatine says, “I need your help, son” there is a musical cue that begins to play, at least in the older version I have. However, this is missing in the latest version, making the jump between the deleted scene and the higher quality scene much more noticeable.

This issue is still present in v2. Idk if you intended for it to be that way, but the music just sort of pops in at an awkward point and makes the cut really noticeable.

Post
#1407365
Topic
The Rise of Skywalker: Ascendant (Released)
Time

TestingOutTheTest said:

Part of me feels that Rey holding the lightsabers of the two Skywalkers who helped shaped her to be the Jedi -
holding their legacy against the man who ruined their lives - is more symbolic and meaningful.

It is also symbolic of if Anakin (Skywalker saber) had stood by Mace (purple lightsaber) to reflect the lightning back at Palpatine. It’s about correcting the mistakes of the past.