logo Sign In

ImperialFighter

User Group
Members
Join date
4-Mar-2008
Last activity
15-Jan-2026
Posts
2,112

Post History

Post
#336011
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
adywan said:

 

The Revisited edits were started so i can get versions of the saga that i have always wanted to see ( not counting the the OUT of course), so removing blue TIEs fits into that perfectly. I toyed with the idea of keeping blue TIEs only due to nostalgia but after seeing the completed colour correction for those sequences i just didn't like them.

 

 

Whew, I'm exausted after all that too!  I reckon that the above statement by Adywan is the ONLY explanation he needs to give anyone, and that goes for any future suggestions too, that any of the good folks here have in the future. 

Like his amazing ANH:R edit, there eventually may be a couple of certain little things in this latest planned edit of his that I would have liked to have seen done differently, but I realize that I'm just so damn lucky that there is someone out there with the talent and commitment to generally improve on this whole saga in the first place....and making it available for myself and everyone else to enjoy.  The fact is that his decisions can't please EVERY differing preferrence from everyone interested....BUT we can rest assured that overall, his own personal ones will probably improve things a lot, and are sure to beat the hell out of the many slip-ups that have been made in the past!

Thanks for your continued interaction here Ady, as you are doing marvellous work for us all.

 

Post
#335378
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

ladyferry -  Thanks again for adding these to YouTube

 

Adywan -  Great to see your improved colouring on this sequence.  Terrifice stuff. 

And your Stardestroyer 'shake' is just perfect!  It's the little things like that which will help to make this edit as awesome as your previous one. 

Post
#334781
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time

ladyferry -  Thanks for adding those recent clips to the YouTube collection.

professa adyfan -  Nice work, and gives a flavour of how things would've looked if Adywan had decided to go with that.  I like that look too, but don't mind either way.

What I REALLY dislike though is the laser from the circular Rebel 'turret' seen firing at an At-At (which is seen in your clip there).  I always thought that this particular laser looked very 'painted on' and not very good.  Maybe Adywan could improve on it somewhat. 

Post
#334054
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
ImperialFighter said:

Can you please do something with the distractingly large, unnatural (hey it's ALL unnatural I know!) 'orange glow' that occurs when a very small asteroid collides into the large 'crater' of the huge 'potato-shaped' asteroid, just after Han replies to C3PO, 'Never tell me the odds'.

Perhaps either put in some 'sparking debris' on it's impact, or get rid of the small asteroid, it's shadow, and subsequent 'orange glow' altogether! Either way would be preferable to what is there at the moment. Thanks.





 

Adywan - The 'glowing' asteroid thing that Monroville and others commented on recently was something I mentioned way back on page 31 of this thread. 

While it's not a big deal, it's something bigger than some of the subtler things you've attended to previously, and seems an over-the-top effect for such a small asteroid impact into the bigger one....  Maybe you could consider even 'toning' the resulting explosion down a tad, or make the tiny asteroid a little bigger....

Just a last thought on that.

 

Post
#333285
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Darth Hade said:

4. Shortened Wampa scene

Honestly, I don't understand the dislike for the new wampa scene. I know the argument for less is more being scarier, but come on, it's Star Wars, not SAW.                                                                                                                                     

And Lucas would've had it in there in 1980 if he could. Ironically, the bad wampa shot is when we first see it hit Luke and kill the tauntaun.

That's the shot that should be removed.

Show just the claw hitting Luke and killing the tauntaun. Wait till the cave to actually see the creature.

If one looks at it logically, the wampa would definitely take both the tauntaun and Luke. There's no way a large meal like that would be passed up in such a frozen wasteland.

So, seeing the wampa eating the tauntaun makes perfect sense.

The only bad shot in that scene is when the wampa starts to slower lumber toward Luke after it stands up from its crouch. In the next shot from the OUT, it has claws raised and is moving very fast.

That makes no sense. Lose that one shot and the scene is perfect, especially if you add burn marks to the wampa's fur, add a little smoke to the wound, and correct the timing of Luke's lightsaber deactivating.

On the other hand.... 

I always personally loved that first 'unexpected' scare of the sudden appearance of a roaring Wampa's face popping up into the frame near the beginning, and would not like to see it omitted from Adywan's edit....especially since that first version has got the best-designed facial features as far as I'm concerned....

Yes, it makes perfect sense for the Taun-Taun to have been eaten....but I certainly don't think that Luke's Taun-Taun was left behind just because we only see Luke being dragged behind the Wampa onscreen.  Surely even the mighty Wampa would have struggled to drag both Luke and the heavy Taun-Taun along to it's ice-cave at the same time, in one trip.... 

While it could be said (and it has been previously) that there is also the possibility that there was more than one Wampa around to share the load....I always thought that Luke had been 'hung up for another time', while the Wampa (or Wampa's) ate the Taun-Taun first, which had been brought back secondly....

As far as which SE shots should be kept or removed, or whether the sequence looked better with none of the new shots, and should just revert back to the minimal original editing and pacing, there seems to be wildly differing opinions, and no consensus unfortunately.  There are a few combinations that would look okay (if they didn't linger so long), but hopefully we'll like Adywan's eventual decision, whatever it turns out to be, even if it reverts to the exact original editing. 

Hey, I'm just looking forward to the re-colouring! :)     

 

Post
#332968
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
adywan said:

Just added more details on what will be fixed in this edit to page 1

 

Fantastic!  Thanks for the latest update on all this.  While they are all going to be anticipated greatly in making this movie even better in many ways, one especially sticks out for me personally -

23. Larger blockade orbiting Hoth

 

This was always something that I hoped you'd look at in some way, in ANY kind of way.  I don't care how you end up adding to the overall effect here, I'm just really pleased that you are doing something here.  It will be great I'm sure. :)  

Post
#331942
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

As bkev said, each to their own, but I'm in the camp that will need more than George just fixing previous errors (such as lightsaber colours and sound mix) in any future releases that are put out, to impress me now.  We'll see what eventually comes out, but in the meantime it's only Ady's future versions that I'm looking forward to expectantly. 

Post
#330843
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

Can someone please clarify this for me? -  on Adywan's 'ANH:R' page on the Fanedit.org site, it gives 'RapidShare' links for the following versions -  Xvid AVI / PAL SL DVD / NTSC SL DVD / NTSC DL DVD / NTSC DVD-5 Purist Edition SL DVD.

What I'm unsure about is this -  While I know that the NTSC DL DVD will be the one with all the 'extras', I didn't realise that there was also a something known as a NTSC SL DVD version (not to be confused with the Purist Edition NTSC SL DVD).  Is this just an NTSC version of Adywan's 'extended' edit without any menus and 'extras'?

Also, I thought that the PAL version with 'extras' would be a PAL DL DVD, yet the 'RapidShare' links just mention a PAL SL DVD, with no mention of a PAL DL DVD.  Again, is this PAL SL DVD that is mentioned, just a version of the 'extended' edit without any menus and 'extras', or have these links been written wrongly?  Thanks for any help in clearing this up for me.

Post
#330361
Topic
'Bring Back... Star Wars' (UK TV - Channel Four Documentary) (Released)
Time

skyjedi2005 -   I wouldn't worry about the fact that we might not see much of Mark and Harrison on this thing.  Usually Justin fails to ever get a 're-union' of any specific show members he goes after!  It's usually just a case of being lucky enough to 'hang out' with the 'more accessable' ones on an individual basis, and reminisce with them on a personal level.  It should still be a warm and possibly irreverent watch.  Enjoy!

Post
#329937
Topic
STAR WARS: EP V &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - <strong>12GB 1080p MP4 VERSION AVAILABLE NOW</strong>
Time
Bingowings said:
Bobocop said:

 

By the way, Bingowings,

Indeed it does but as much as I would like to take credit for the hardwork of others that was asterisk8 who did those there shots, I was merely commenting on them.

 

 

What 'reflection shots'?  I think these must have been in the 8 posts that I can't see....  What were they concerning?