No, we live in a world where the people who worked on the '97 SE read the books. If Corucsant in the '97SE was already a PT reference, then why did they have to alter it in 2004 to make it a PT reference?
Actually, what I have is a scan of a good reference print, so there's no guarantee that it is perfectly correct. But yeah, memories are the worst reference, plus it sounds like they just watched a part of my sources documentary (thrice re-compressed, if they watched it on youtube) and his dad just made some off hand comments.
To be honest, it's starting to make me physicaly ill to keep going in circles discussing the colors in Despecialized - I'm the first to admit that they are by no means perfectly accurate but they do look much better than the official BD. Can't we just leave it at that? If I ever do anothwr version, I'll be starting completely from scratch anyway, so there's no real constructive point in discussing the colors in the current one to death.
Oh, no - I'm not hinting at anything like that. Just showing off my new setup, that's all. I'm not in charge of making the BD.
Wow, cool!
Saw this in the street the other day:
It made me think of Star Wars for some reason...
Finally!!! The Despecialized Edition is playing in my living room the way it was meant to :)
*Knocks on wood...
Actually, 4K TVs are dropping in price rapidly and can be had for as little as $350. But I agree that 1080p might be sufficient for now, as the detail in a projection print isn't likely to exceed that.
Thank you so much!
ronwlim said:
pittrek,
I actually thought of making a few for sale, but then decided it was against the spirit of Harmy's work. I'll include all the elements to make everything yourself. Though be forewarned, its a ardulous process to recreate, and not inexpensive.
As long as they didn't include the actual movies I'd be fine with it :-)
Actually, how would you feel about making one of those babies for the guy who made the Despecialized Edition? I'd be happy to cover the cost of postage and material. Pretty please...
I would also love me one of these:
http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Blu-Ray-and-other-HD-box-size-STAR-WARS-covers/post/745885/#TopicPost745885
so I'd like to extend the same request to spheretronic or anyone willing to make that from the files he provided.
It would make me all giddy to have these on my shelf and even more so if I knew and could tell people that they were made by fans of Despecialized!
I'd also be happy to give you some kind of special credit in future DeEd projects.
That is awesome! Thanks for sharing!
Nice :D
More like many other things got f*cked up.
Those are some of the best seeded torrents on the spleen. Try using uTorrent instead.
newguy said:
Harmy said:
I have no problem with anyone using my stuff as a source for their projects, so feel free to use anything you may want.
And yes, I did the CC shot-by-shot based on a scan of an I.B. Technicolor print, which had a lot of color inconsistency and I must admit that if I was to do it over, I'd go for a bit more natural and consistent color-palette, much like what you're doing here.Thanks, so far I've only used the speeder scene from mos eisley and the censored blaster impact (were is this sourced from btw? The detail is on par with the bluray).
https://plus.google.com/u/1/photos/109609428403596349302/albums/5932164278535972945/5932166480978474338?pid=5932166480978474338&oid=109609428403596349302
https://plus.google.com/u/1/photos/109609428403596349302/albums/5932164278535972945/5932166538969673938?pid=5932166538969673938&oid=109609428403596349302
Having a hard time to match the mos eisley scene with my version though, I wish I could get my hands on a non manipulated clip of this scene. Is the source for that from Team Negative1?
I could provide the original clip if Team Negative 1 give their blessing but it has a lot of grain and dirt and it also has a big "Saving Star Wars" logo in the lower right corner, which I had to paint out.
PM sent :)
Yes. Grain also helps create the illusion of detail. It's really all about the experience - if you feel like you're watching a detailed image, it is more important than actually seeing one that is a little more detailed but actually feels less so because everything looks like plastic.
That is not what the BD looks like. But if there were scenes looking like that, I would simply add some grain.
I didn't think I'd see the day Frink would miss a joke.
I don't know. This thread ownership is a bit tricky. Does the fact that you started the thread mean that you own it? Or does it belong to the countless forum members who read it and fell in love with it?
I have no problem with anyone using my stuff as a source for their projects, so feel free to use anything you may want.
And yes, I did the CC shot-by-shot based on a scan of an I.B. Technicolor print, which had a lot of color inconsistency and I must admit that if I was to do it over, I'd go for a bit more natural and consistent color-palette, much like what you're doing here.
Oh, the fact that they actually build this droid practically was one thing I was extremely impressed by.
I don't know, to me, both of these images look like photoshop paintings, especially when viewed at full resolution.
Well, based on how horrible Black Angel looks on iTunes (and that is HD), I'd say that even if it is the original, your LD rips may still look better.
I'm personally not too excited. There were some bits I liked and there were some I didn't. Some of the character moments were nice but in the last shot, it didn't click for me as seeing Han again, I just saw Harrison Ford, I don't know why and Chewie looks really weird too.
And the VFX shots reminded me of this video by MVerta about VFX shots grounded in reality, which was a hallmark of the original movies. The crazy camera moves, while cool, just don't read as reality. It looks sort of incogruent with not only the original movies but, from what we've seen so far, also with the live action in this new movie.