- Post
- #772240
- Topic
- 4K restoration on Star Wars
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/772240/action/topic#772240
- Time
Oh, sorry, I'm visiting my folks, so I haven't had a chance to take a proper look at it yet.
Oh, sorry, I'm visiting my folks, so I haven't had a chance to take a proper look at it yet.
Well, I recently bought a 28" 4K Samsung monitor and it looks absolutely marvelous - it's sitting right next to my old 28" 1080p monitor and the difference is staggering! When I got the 58" 4K Panasonic, the pixels on it were pretty much the same size as on the 28" 1080p monitor, so the image quality difference wasn't that amazing compared to what I was used to but with this new monitor, which is close to retina resolution, the difference is amazing - I now understand why some people say that 4K is just a stepping stone to 8K. I don't think we'll ever need 8K content but heed my words, 8K screens are coming, because as we get used to retina displays on our phones and tablets, we become more sensitive to seeing the pixels on our TVs.
http://www.videohelp.com/software/tsmuxer
This program will create a BD ISO for you - no transcoding so the quality is kept and it only takes few minutes.
None of the releases so far has been completely GOUT-free and I'm afraid v2.0 of Jedi won't be either but the GOUT presence should be absolutely minimal.
What's more interesting is that among his videos is also a couple of video of screenings of Star Wars, which are clearly German too and in the description he claims it's a Technicolor print and from the colors in the videos it seems believable - so were there tech prints made for other European countries than just Britain?
The sample is compressed to hell. You need at least 100MB/s for 4K to look decent with h264 and even then it will crap up the detail and smudge grain. That is why they came up with HEVC for the 4K content.
Oh, yeah, definitely the BD will be used. And commentaries will be included.
The new sources will be Team N1's 35mm scans and possibly Puggo's 16mm.
Audio will be the same as the other 2.x releases except I don't think there's a mono mix of Jedi.
Or one of those fancy new 4K BD players ;-)
Probably for v2.0 already.
Yeah, that's definitely a lens flare - always been there.
I'm sorry, I don't follow. Do you mean the lens flare? Also, this belongs in the ESB thread.
http://www.dvd-guides.com/guides/blu-ray-copy/260-burn-blu-ray-avchd-using-imgburn
Yes, just like the push for 3D TVs - pretty much every TV today, except for the most low end ones, is 3D, just like pretty much all TVs within a couple of years will be 4K.
And sure, 4K BDs will be for cinefiles only but isn't that what most of us are here - most non-cinefiles were pretty happy with the GOUT after all :-)
And while 4K BD may be pretty niche, 4K streaming is catching on pretty fast.
By this, I'm not saying you should necessarily do this project in 4K, because sourced from prints, 4K as a final output may actually be a bit of an over-kill and 4K makes everything much harder to deal with and you need super-powerful hardware if the work's not to become awfully frustrating (I would know, I deal with 4K on a daily basis), I'm just pointing out that your reasoning behind why not to go 4K is flawed.
Well, I have a 4K 58" TV and I brought it home through the front door :D
And as soon as they come down in price a bit, I'm getting a 4K projector for my 135" projection screen (which I also brought home through the front door).
4K BD players are already officially announced and the number of people with 4K TVs is growing rapidly.
I'd also like to point out that I typed the previous msg on my phone after having drunk 5 glasses of wine in abouz two hours, so you'll have to exuse the typos :-)
OK, here's the report: Even though it was the '97 SE as expected, even though I was sitting in the 9th row and the tallest guy in the theater was sitting right in front of me, so I was in dire need of binoculars/periscope, it was still an amazing experience.
I noticed that Hoth was surprisingly white and Dagobah surprisingly blue but over-all, I'd say the colors in ESB v 2.0 are pretty good.
Going into more detail, Hoth was very white (actually almost yellowish) in the highlights and very blue in the shadows. Dagobah was pretty much blue/cyan tinted throughout. One other thing I noticed was that all the "empire shots" (abord Star Destroyers, AT-ATs) were distinctly teal-orange tinted. Another thing was that Vader's lightsaber was more orange that red and Luke's was pretty desaturated blue (with no hint of teal). And over-all, the freezing chamber shots were less saturated than I'd expect.
Another important thing I was watching out for were matte-boxes in non-recomped shots. I definitelly saw some because I was paying close attention and looking for them, so they are visible on 35mm prints, but they were nowhere near as obvious as on the BD and other home-video releases.
But we are talking about the '97 SE here and also the whole thing was clearly too dark (very little shadow detail to be seen), so I don't think the bulb brightness was quite right, so this is no definitive proof of anything, but I still made some interesting observations and I definitely had a good time :-)
I'm on my way to Prague where I've been invited to attend a 35mm screening of TESB. I expect it will be the 97SE but it should still be pretty cool.
It's part both - the color "correction" done to the BD can only be undone to a certain degree and sometimes things like that get revealed when you change the flat colors of the BD.
I certainly hope to, if I can get a 35mm source for that.
Hmmm, boobies! Harmy like! Must buy!
I know. And it doesn't - only has one HDMI connector.
Great! Thank you!
MPC HC with Mad VR. I use Any DVD HD to decode BDs, so that I can play them in MPC as well and the results are far better than when I play them in my BD player - less banding, less visible compression artiifacts, more detail, plus FFDshow allows me to add grain, which helps a lot with hiding DNR and compression artifacts.