logo Sign In

Harmy

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Feb-2010
Last activity
16-Aug-2025
Posts
7,233
Web Site
http://revengeofthejedi.wz.cz

Post History

Post
#440097
Topic
RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
Time

dark_jedi said:

Harmy said:

WOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR GOD'S SAKE

LOL, Isn't editing copyrighted video and releasing it to everyone illegal? To funny!

 

Wow, wow, wow, hold yer horses, who said anything about releasing, in my threads I usually instruct people to PM if they are interested in the edits but as far as the thread is concerned my reply to these PMs can well be: "Well, you can't have it, punk!" And there's nothing illegal about editing the video...

:-D :-D :-D

Post
#440078
Topic
RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
Time

Yeah, I thought of using the 2004 DVD video for the subs, although it would mean a 4th different source to be dealing with. But to use the script you've still gotta have the font in your computer and also adding the subs in AVISYNTH would mean reencodig the whole video again and I don't think that is a good idea. I can't get them right myself without buying the font (and believe me, I tried.) If someone could make a PSD photoshop file with the subs in it (ideally already with the shadow and positioned and stretched for 720x576 anamorphic video) I could try adding them in After Effects, which would also be good for trying to match the grain and feather on them.

Post
#440022
Topic
RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
Time

Thanks, guys, I'll keep myself busy then :-)

I tried to do something about the added Boba Fett flirting with dancers shots, other than just splicing in GOUT because the GOUT quality is quite bad in these shots but it looks like I'll have to do it that way because no blending seems possible to pull off convincingly as the quality difference is sadly huge.

I removed one of these shots in the PDE but there I used a reversed shot of Chewie from later in the scene to substitute for the Boba shot but that is something I can't pull in a reconstruction so even though it will be quite a big quality jump I'll have to use GOUT for both of these shots.

Post
#439927
Topic
RETURN OF THE JEDI 1983 THEATRICAL VERSION RECONSTRUCTION DVD by Harmy (MKV, NTSC DVD5 AND PAL DVD9 AVAILABLE)
Time

OK, a question, guys: How was the Classic Edition (and the other similar restorations)? I'm just asking whether this hasn't already been done, because honestly, for my personal watching I'll probably be sticking to the PDE until a true full HD version of OOT comes out, so if you guys can already get this in DVD quality elsewhere, there's no point doing it. There's no way I'm doing this in HD, which would make it worthwhile compared to other edits, but there's just too much GOUT and the KGAR is actually pretty bad too.

In other words, having seen the PDE (I'm keeping most of the changes the way they are there) and the samples I posted, do you feel confident this could be better than the edits released so far?

Concerning the ending celebration, I'd be using only GOUT there, as the SE celebration was heavily recut and while it was possible to get close to the original in the PDE using the SE footage it is not possible to do an exact reconstruction because while most of the original shots are there, many of them are missing several frames. But I think that the clebration in Jedi is a prime example of where the GOUT actually looks pretty good; (I guess it depends on the reel they scanned from but I don't know) It has quite a lot of grain but it's also got a lot of fine detail and has a very film like look to it IMO.