logo Sign In

Handman

User Group
Members
Join date
25-May-2014
Last activity
9-May-2025
Posts
3,667

Post History

Post
#1024275
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Haarspalter said:

TV’s Frink said:

suspiciouscoffee said:

TV’s Frink said:

Mavimao said:

The prequels for one. Great soundtracks. But mediocre films.

Tron Legacy…

Tron Legacy is also a great soundtrack, but I happen to think it’s a very good film as well.

Yeah!

Superior to the original in many ways, actually.

NOT YEAH!

Don’t get me wrong, I think Tron is good…but it also hasn’t aged very well.

f

Tron Legacy is aging faster than light speed.

Oh gosh, that’s what Tarkin will look like in 6 years. I’m not ready.

Post
#1023923
Topic
Doctor Who
Time

suspiciouscoffee said:

If what I read online is true and Hartnell broke the 4th wall to wish the audience a happy Christmas, then I really wish Dalek’s Master Plan would show up someday. It’s nigh impossible for hardly any lost episodes to ever be found though, yes?

Unfortunately, the episode where Hartnell wished us a happy Christmas was episode 7, “Feast of Steven”, the only 60s Who episode that wasn’t telecined, so the chances of its recovery are zero. Fortunately every other episode was, so there’s at least the possibility.

Post
#1023743
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Anchorhead said:

Palpatine is one cameo that I would have really disliked. Enough of his signature on every damn film. A one-dimensional character with no place in this tangent story. Same for a Hayden showing. Also super glad he wasn’t part of this. As an original fan, I’ve been bombarded with prequelisms for nearly twenty years. Glad they threw me a bone and let me enjoy the 1977 story again.

^Yeah, there were a few prequel influences here, but I’m glad they didn’t go overboard with it.

Post
#1023621
Topic
Gen-X Thread
Time

DominicCobb said:

Handman said:

They also call VCRs, VHS players, and it bothers me.

Are they not interchangeable terms? Always thought so.

But who calls them that? They were always called VCRs, nobody called them VHS players. Hell, most people didn’t even call them VHS tapes, it was just a tape or video, Betamax tapes were Beta, nobody got confused. It just sounds stupid.

What really cracks me up was when I had a young guy correct me from saying VCR to VHS player. That’s just wrong.

Post
#1023593
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

CHEWBAKAspelledwrong said:

Did anyone get a good enough look at the recycled 77 footage to determine what master it came from?

Officially, they said it was archival footage of unused takes they digitally scanned in and matted into new cockpits just for this, so no new master of the OT.
http://screencrush.com/rogue-one-unused-star-wars-footage/

Post
#1023179
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

I am surprised that only one point I had against the film has been the focus here. The main sin Rogue One commits is that it’s just boring to me.

Fan film and fan service, etc., are slurs only in the case of a huge feature film. We generally expect different things from something from a fan than from filmmakers. It goes along the same line of thinking where in response to people saying the Despecialized Editions should be official, Harmy saying he’d be outraged. Because he expects better.

Post
#1022951
Topic
Rogue One * <em>Spoilers</em> * Thread
Time

Lord Haseo said:

Handman said:

Hi again, first chance to chime in about Vader again despite the topic having kind of shifted from that. So if that’s an issue I apologize.

In regards to the Bespin duel in ESB, comparing that to Vader going apeshit isn’t really the same. There’s so much context to that duel, so much feeling, so much shifting motivations, how Vader just toys with Luke for awhile and then goes all out by the end that it’s not even a fair comparison.

That’s not the point of the comparison. The point of the comparison is to prove Vader can be brutish sometimes. You’re looking too deep into it.

My point was that it’s not the same. Glad I’m able to look too deep into things.

In the new one, he just goes apeshit to a level only seen in something like The Force Unleashed

Starkiller was turning people into ash and crushing AT-ST’s with the Force so no.

It still looked like a video game, and might as well have been as ridiculous.

and it’s the only time he pulls out a lightsaber for anyone not wielding the same, calling to question numerous times he could have done so in the original films.

Well, I’ve been calling this into question for years so this seems more like a personal problem.

It’s entirely a personal problem, it’s my opinion isn’t it? 😛

The end of ESB shows Vader does have limitations, Luke was still incredibly inexperienced, why couldn’t Vader just lift him up at any point like he does the Rebels? Why does Vader suddenly seem so much more limitless in what he’s capable of doing with the Force in Rogue One and come across as sort of a putz in the original by comparison? His line in ESB, “Bring my shuttle”, shows just how much rage he was just trying to keep in after having his plans foiled. That’s not the same kind of guy who would just go apeshit to no-name rebels.

For one, Vader was facing against regular beings and not Force Sensitives. Secondly, he seemed just as imposing in ESB especially considering that Luke was a somewhat trained Force sensitive

The execution in Rogue One was still ridiculous, you can read my responses to luckydube56 for more on why that is.

In this way, the use of Tarkin was much more faithful to the character, he never does anything we wouldn’t expect him to. But Vader has changed from all the video games and the prequel films reframing his character since the OT that it somehow influenced how he is portrayed right before the events of the original film. It doesn’t mesh. Why would he be okay with sending in the troops onto the Tantive later on when he could just deal with them himself much more effectively? Why wouldn’t he use more effective means to torture the rebel commander on the ship, instead of accidentally kill him clumsily?

We should have gotten a scene like this in the OT. I don’t think Rogue One should be scolded for the OT’s mistakes. Also isn’t it a little more than implausible to assume Vader has never done something like this before?

I think DominicCobb said the same thing, but I wouldn’t call it an OT mistake and more Rogue One not doing enough to mesh with Vader’s portrayal there.

Anyway, most everything I had to say about it has already been said in the following posts. What did you think of those?

In the end the movie would have worked just as well without Vader, and for me personally, it would have benefited from it.