logo Sign In

Han Solo VS Indiana Jones

User Group
Members
Join date
5-Jan-2005
Last activity
18-Mar-2009
Posts
2,295

Post History

Post
#154951
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab
I hate how absurdly dificult DVDs are getting to open anymore. I tried to open both my Batman Begins DVD and my SW Episode III DVD, and on both I damaged the packaging tryign to get those stuipd security stickers off.


I agree.

I hate it that Fox won't let go of the Simpsons. That show has been jumping the shark repeatedly for ages now.
Post
#154950
Topic
Changes you want (or don't want) to the 2007 archival editions
Time
Originally posted by: Adamwankenobi
I don't know. He has said many times how much he respects the work of Alec Guiness and of how he plans to never do a CG Yoda for ESB and ROTJ. And I know you know the whole deal with him trying to get Frank Oz the academy award for it and all. Hm... maybe he just doesn't have the respect for certain actors, that he does for others.


I know Lucas can't help himself when it comes to tinkering, tampering and other wise ruining his own legacy.
Post
#154673
Topic
Changes you want (or don't want) to the 2007 archival editions
Time
I tried to ignore the whole Greedo shoots first thing, but I can't deny that it's impossible for Greedo to have missed Han even slightly when they were so close together.

Yet Han still shoots first at Darth Vader in ESB when Vader was just occupying the physical space, making no move to attack Han, yet Han shoots at him anyway. Why isn't that murder? It was murder for Han to shoot Greedo first when Greedo so clearly wanted to waste Han but it's not murder for Han to shoot at Vader when Vader did not display any signs of attacking Han. That's just screwed up.

I fear that all the Alec Guinness ghosts will have Guinness replaced with a ghost of the young Ewan McGregor.

The special editions suck, the worst offenses being the digital replacements of Clive Revill as the ESB Emperor and Sebastian Shaw as Anakin's ghost in ROTJ. These changes were uncalled for and are disrespectful to the original actors. George Lucas is a hypocrtical asshole.
Post
#153582
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time


I always considered Kidder to be an unattractive Karen Allen.


Thank God, I've finally found some folks who agree with me about Kidder. That's up to four now, counting my former English teacher, Dennis Kaplan. Lord knows better actresses auditioned for the part - I think they should have gone with Anne Archer. On the other hand, I could have seen Kathleen Turner or Sigourney Weaver doing Lois Lane. Age is a funny thing here - Reeve was only 24 (26 by the time of release) and Kidder was like 30 something.
Post
#153450
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Warbler
Well, I have never found Alda anywhere near smug, irritating or egotistical. And you can say he ruined M*A*S*H but without Mash never would have been a great show to begin with.


You may be interested to learn that Richard Hornberger, who wrote the original book on which MASH (both the film and TV series) was based, under the name 'Richard Hooker', loathed Alan Alda's portrayal of Hawkeye Pierce.

As for Superman 4, well, the Superman movie franchise had pretty much fallen apart by that point, and given the film's obvious lack of a budget, the film most likely would have sucked regardless of the plot. Mariel Hemmingway was pretty hot though, I agree, but there's that whole Lois Lane thing, even when Lois is played by someone as off putting and unappealing as Margot Kidder.
Post
#153244
Topic
The Things We Hate And Love Thread .
Time
Originally posted by: Warbler
I hate the fact that the Eagles have crashed and burned.

I hate what is going on in France right now.

I hate T.O.

I hate the fact that Jay let certain member return.

I hate the fact that my high school football team whose record was was 0-7 played another team whose record was 0-7, and got killed by that team. Now their record is 0-8.

Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
I hate Alan Alda.


why? He was wonderful in Mash, and is doing a good job on the West Wing. Funny guy and good actor. What's to hate about him?


To each their own. I find him smug, irritating and egotistical in just about every performance he gives, and personally I think he ruined M*A*S*H when he assumed more creative control during the later seasons. It was always preachy, but thanks to Alda at the end it got WAY too preachy.

I hate T.O. as well.

Post
#152702
Topic
Watching in order 1-6 is screwing up the original SW for newcomers!
Time
Originally posted by: CO
I was reading a thread on the force.net, and I am starting to notice a trend of newcomers that watch the saga, the so called way Lucas says we are suppose to watch it now, 1-6, is making Episode IV worse!

They watch 1-3, and love all the flash, the fast lightsaber duels, the new CG special effects, and watch it as the story of Anakin Skywalker to Darth Vader, and the rise of Palpatine to The Emperor.

When they get to Episode IV, all of the sudden they are asking question that Lucas obviously didn't address when he made the movie back in 1977.

Where is The Emperor, he is the star of the prequels, and he is mentioned in one line in the movie?

Where is the inner thoughts of Vader about his loss of his wife, and why is the whole movie really not about him?

Why is the lightsaber battle so slow, and really nothing comparable to the prequels?

Why is the score totally different, except for the opening crawl, and just seems disjointed compared to the other three?

Why when they go to hyperspace, do they not go into that circle, and then go to hyperspace like the prequels?

Why does ObiWan call him Darth Vader in Episode IV, and when he called him Anakin throughout the Duel in Episode III, when he was clearly Darth Vader by then?

Why do the special effects seem so inferior when it is 20 years later in the saga?

All these questions have a simple answer: The movie was made in 1977, and Lucas didn't think have half of these ideas in mind when making the original Star Wars!

This is Exhibit A why a newcomer should watch the saga 4-6, then 1-3. All of these questions are constantly being asked through the movie, but don't need to, cause it was made as a single movie at the time. You should watch Episode IV first, enjoy it for it was : A space adventure about good vs. evil, and focus on Luke, Han, & Leia, because they are the true heroes of the movie. A person who watched 1-3 first, keeps focusing on Darth Vader, and his character isn't given ample screentime that it would today if Lucas would have made them with the true intenion of the saga being about Darth Vader.

You should watch Episode IV, and if you want more Star Wars, then be shown 5 & 6, and then you will understand this is a bigger story than what you saw in the original, but you won't be tainted for stuff to look for that just isn't there. And if you want more, there is a backstory that was filmed 20 years later, and it looks different cause of technology, even the Yoda character is different looking, but it is a backstory and it will give you many answers about Darth Vader you may have been wondering.

My ass that the saga should be watched 1-6! By Lucas putting this silly order in the heads of the new fans, he has now screwed up the one movie that is a classic they HE directed, The Original Star Wars.

GOOD JOB GEORGE!


I feel your pain, CO. Many of us feel your pain. Good points on all.