Han Solo VS Indiana Jones

Originally posted by: Darth Chaltab




Denise Richards (Yeah, that "Nuclear physicist" from 007)

Originally posted by: greencapt
Interesting. I *hated* 'Unbreakable (my one word review- 'Unwatchable'). Mainly this was due to my dislike of M. Night Ramalamadingdong's self-indulgent plotting and pacing which I feel he uses to cover up 'stories' which all revolve around one small idea, usually revealing in his 'surprise' endings. Maybe its just me- maybe the world needs more films with 15 minute shots of people walking down the stairs.

As for 'Hulk' I only recently saw it but would only rate it about 2 1/2 skulls out of 5. Well shot visually for the most part but I feel it suffers from too many chefs- Lee who may or may not have known the characters wanted to do one type of film. This kind of story works just fine in comics where you can have all sorts of specials and 'What If?'s or various single issues. The studio on the other hand wanted another 'Spider-Man', etc and there are *so* many scenes in the films which just scream to me 'studio interference' and I'm sure it was a constant battle... and when it comes down to it the studio pays the bills so they're allowed to do that. Many films mess around with the source material and I'm cool with that as long as it benefits and/or improves the story (ie Raimi decides not to make Peter Parker a scientific genius so the audience can relate to him a bit more, and therefore a non-genius would have had a hard time inventing webshooters- so they become organic to the spider bite).

I think I've reached a point with the new Superman film that I just don't care. None of the supposed plot elements sound all that interesting to me and none of the pictures released scream 'Superman' to me. I hope Routh is a great actor but to me he appears to have the same slack-jawed expression in every image. 'Duh I'm, uh, Superman right? Oh yeah- I'm wearing this suit.'

I'll probably not make any big effort to see this film. I wish that Singer would have just tried to make it his own instead of trying to make it a 'sequel' to Superman II.

Originally posted by: PSYCHO_DAYV
THE LAST PIC CONTAINED NUDITY WHICH VIOLATES THE THREAD RULES. I REALLY DON'T THINK THAT ANYBODY MINDS, BUT WE NEED TO STICK TO THE LAWS OF THE LAND.

Originally posted by: theredbaron


Yeah, so is it good?!

I watched Ang Lee's Hulk today, and in all honesty, I thought the criticism of this movie was completely unwarranted (too much sulking, not enough hulking - there was plenty of hulking!). I reckon Ang Lee 'gets' what comics and superheroes are all about. The movie gets *at least* three and a half stars outta me. Better than the Spiderman movies, definitely, IMHO.

Originally posted by: theredbaron
Something I have to ask - is the Flash movie any good? Which Flash is in it?

Originally posted by: PSYCHO_DAYV
I THINK THAT JENNIFER CONNELLY WOULD MAKE A GREAT WONDER WOMAN.

Originally posted by: ADigitalMan


Didn't she bare her ta-tas in Pink Floyd: The Wall? I think she was one of the groupies during "Young Lust" if I'm not mistaken.

Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
"and blonde too."

She was a redhead in Willow.

Originally posted by: sean wookie


I really hate when people don't understand stuff and think you are a freak.

Originally posted by: twister111

"George show me the money!"


Episode 7: Carbonited Han Solo Clones Strike Back


"I want you to walk over there faster."


"Chewie your fur is blocking my view."

Originally posted by: theredbaron
Fair go - MIIB is easily worse than GB2. The pug was WAAAY overplayed - he was mildly funny in a 'oh look, there's a dog and he's talking!' kind of way, the first time around. I think they drew him out to market the film towards the kids. Like Jar Jar Binks, only not as bad (though still annoyed the shite outta me)...

Originally posted by: segaflip
Diagnostic Criteria For 299.80 Asperger's Disorder
A. Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following:

1. marked impairments in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction
2. failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level
3. a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g. by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people)
4. lack of social or emotional reciprocity


B. Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following:

1. encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus
2. apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals
3. stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements)
4. persistent preoccupation with parts of objects


C. The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning


D. There is no clinically significant general delay in language (e.g., single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years)


E. There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of age-appropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood


F. Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia