logo Sign In

GundarkHunter

User Group
Members
Join date
10-Mar-2003
Last activity
9-Apr-2017
Posts
4,720

Post History

Post
#218284
Topic
Nintendo Wii
Time
When I bought the GameCube, it came with 2 controllers and Mario Kart Double Dash. Most of the games we've bought since have been for the kids. I never really have time to play, but I do have a handful of games of my own (Soul Calibur II, Metroid Prime I & II, Rebel Strike, Scorpion King and Donkey Konga 2). My wife actually plays more often than I do (she's addicted to Zelda and Animal Crossing).
Post
#213580
Topic
The Reason the OOT was released
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
I agree, Harlock, and I'm glad you brought the issue up.

For those of you who have the '93 Laserdiscs, I see positively no reason to purchase the DVD. You already have an official version struck from the exact same master. Having an LD -> DVD project is nothing more than an archive of material you own so my statement above applies in your case as well. If you aren't selling rips, and you shelled out friggin $250 for the Definitive Collection set, you've made a nice payment towards that Star Wars license.

It would be an interesting legal argument that you'd probably lose if you had a pirate of the official O-OT DVD as your archive, but even that would make an interesting case that has yet to be tried. I think you'd actually be in clearer territory just owning the X0 project or whatever as the definitive archive of your LDs.

Disclaimer: I'm no lawyer, so none of my statements are legal advice. Just legal speculation.

I am a lawyer [almost; I'll be called to the bar in August]. The defence you are using is what is known as the fair use doctrine, and was the defence used in the "home taping " cases of the 1980s. The same logic still applies: Why should I have to go out and buy a brand spankin' new version of something I already own in order to play it on a different machine? In the late 70s-early 80s, it was albums being recorded to cassettes for use in car stereos. The same logic can be applied to "ripping" CDs you legitimately own for the purpose of burning them to a recordable CD in MP3 format for a car deck or transferring them to a portable MP3 player. The DMCA or Digital Millenium Copyright Act tries to circumnavigate this by throwing in all sorts of mumbojumbo with respect to copy-protected material, but the principle has yet to be tested before the courts, mostly because the music and film industries are still hung up on "catching the pirates."

Since I don't own an LD player or any copies of Star Wars on LD, this decision still really pi$$es me off.