logo Sign In

Grinder

User Group
Members
Join date
29-Jun-2005
Last activity
12-Dec-2012
Posts
223

Post History

Post
#156414
Topic
<strong>The Jedi/Feta Definitive Collection</strong> (Released)
Time
Originally posted by: dark_jedi
Grinder,could i possibly get copies of your capture?
i would LOVE to test YOURS on my 62" DLP Hi-Def Widescreen TV,with High-end Yamaha Reciever for sound,and see just how GOOD yours would look.
my guess is,it would NOT look to good
DJ

What the hell?! I did not say anything ABOUT your capture, I just wanted to know whether or not it was your capture. I've never criticised your transfering in any way. I very much appreciate it, for comparing the different LD sets, you know that. Don't confuse me with the naggers. And yes, you can get a copy of my transfer, on which I'm working at the moment, and I'm telling you it WILL look good

EDIT:

Originally posted by: Darth Mallwalker
I think you've misinterpreted Grinder's comment.
I'll betcha he meant another dark_jedi capture rather than his own or somebody else's


You got it!
Post
#156413
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
Along these lines, did your comparisons ever include the Battle of Yavin, because this segment of the Faces discs (Disc 2, side 1) is in CAV as well. You may find that they look identical (except for contrast). If so, then it is your player creating the blur, rather than the disc itself.


I don't have the discs myself, I'll have to check DJ's transfer for that. Comparing CAV to CAV played back on the same player, the differences you see are on the disc, I'm curious what comes out...
Post
#155414
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Oh I know the 2950/925/909 don't even come near the X0/X9/S9. There's no question about that. But I live in PAL land, so that's why I have PAL/NTSC players myself. I have been thinking about getting one of those top Japanese ones, but unless the final product of this project will blow me right off of the couch, I'm not willing to spend THAT much money. It's gone far out of hand already, with two players and over 150 discs )
Post
#155319
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Originally posted by: gltaylor74
Sorry if this is off topic, but I'm wondering if there were seperate U.S. and Japanese pressing of the definitive collection set like there was the Faces set?


Yes, there is, but I can't tell you if it's better or not. It was on ebay last week: link.

And nin, thanks for all the LD info, and for those X9/X0 screencaps. Really interesting stuff. What are your experiences with the 2950/925/909? I'd like to know what you have to say about those, how do they compare (I have a 909 and just got a 2950, but haven'y done a thorough comparison yet).
Post
#154984
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
No compared to those they may look slightly better, but I doubt it. I've seen the US ones on my own LD player, and Dark Jedi's transfer of the SC set on DVD. And I didn't notice any difference. The LD was just a bit better, but that's because the other was a transfer to DVD, and that will never look as good as the original source. At least, no single transfer as of yet, has.
Post
#153991
Topic
Idea &amp; Info: an OT preservation project in Anamorphic W/S + on Dual-Layer DVD = ?
Time
That's right, so the transfer with the least benefit from putting it on DL instead of SL will be X0 But I really wonder if you'd get more compression artifacts in an anamorpic transfer than in a non-anamorphic one... There is less black and more image, this makes it harder to compress. But it's also less sharp (when watching them both in a 4:3 ratio) which makes it easier to compress. Would that cancel each other out?
Post
#151915
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
I have to say that clip speaks for itself The temporal smoothing is worse than anywhere in the "R2 in the valley" sequence. Maybe there could be benefit from using some SC footage. But bear in mind that aside from the previous comments, the SC also has a LOT of artifacting. And I forgot to mention that - just as the color - the aspect ratio is all over the place.
Post
#151646
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
When I heard all the good reactions about the DJ's transfers of Sega's Japanese SC set, I decided to get the US equivalents. Got them pretty cheap, $15 (plus $30 shipping to Holland). And I carefully examined them on my DVL-909, comparing them to my definitive set. The only positive things I noticed were:
- the absence of motion smearing, this is very evident
- the presence of stars, especially those in the opening shot of SW
I also noticed they are much brighter than the definitive, so in some scenes you see more (things which are black or very dark on the definitive). I can't say if this is better or not, it just gives you a whole other viewing experience.
But after the examination I sold them again (for $45, plus shipping), the reasons? It has much more noise, the colors are way off in some scenes, especially the desert scenes. The shot in ROTJ of R2 and 3PO on their way to Jabba's palace has a horrible, oversaturated and weird look for instance. The definitive also has a bit more detail, and I discovered what THX certified sound means.
Now, the noise was my biggest problem, an X0 will deal with most of that, but there definitely is more noise on the discs. Zion, you haven't seen these on the X0 yet, right? And what you said about the shift towards green (due to film ageing or not), could that could that have something to do with the green shading present in Cowclops' v2? I noticed it in DJ's Definitive capture aswell btw.