logo Sign In

Grinder

User Group
Members
Join date
29-Jun-2005
Last activity
12-Dec-2012
Posts
223

Post History

Post
#357839
Topic
Help: looking for... The HD broadcasts
Time

Thanks for the heads up ChainsawAsh. Though I'm really NOT in favour of the whole fan-edit business, Adywan seems to have done a good job. Leaving changes to a minimum. I mean, nobody wants to see the Jabba scene ever again, and the color correction looks good from what I've seen. Still, I was talking about the not-tampered-with HD broadcasts. Do you know what the source was?

Post
#357819
Topic
Help: looking for... The HD broadcasts
Time

I’m very bad at looking stuff up in the forums, can’t find anything about the HD releases floating around. I recently got all episodes in full-HD at PAL speed, recorded from the BBC by someone. The sound on ANH was pretty crappy, with a lot of hiss on 3POs dialogue and a few blips. Can anyone elaborate of the different versions, there surely must have been NTSC broadcasts aswell.

I still am an OT-buff though, it hurts me a bit to be watching the SE verions volutarily, but man there’s so much detail! I noticed several continuity errors I had never seen before.

Post
#341648
Topic
Is laserdisc better than VHS?
Time
Mielr said:

Quite frankly, unless you're planning on collecting a bunch of laserdiscs, I wouldn't go to the expense of buying a LD player just to play the OOT LDs on. I did that about 5 years ago, and had I known that the GOUT DVDs were coming out, I wouldn't have because it would have saved me several hundred dollars. :-/

 

Sounds familiar :o) and if it's just about SW you're right. The GOUT DVDs are better than any LD playback, X0 included. But media fanatic as I am, SW led me to the world laserdisc and I now have 3 players and over 300 discs.

A couple of posts back I read something about closed caption decoders. I still don't have one for my player, and in Europe no-one has ever heard of closed captioning. I see the occasional decoder passing by on ebay, can anyone tell me if all those decoders are suitable for laserdisc cc decoding, or do you need a special breed?

Post
#291653
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Being in college and living by myself I don't have the time anymore to spend entire evenings at the computer (to finish my simple PAL-fullscreen LD transfer for example). Now this project takes up more time than all the others combined, so I don't understand how you guys even find the time at all to do such extensive work all in your free time. The only thing I'm interested in are SW transfers and technical discussions about them, I don't give much about fan-edits. So this thread is the reason I keep logging in every few weeks. As long as it will be finished, and before I'm old and wrinkled - just slightly remebering some movies which had stars and wars, I'll be happy. I'd rather wait another year than see a result which could have been better (in your right mind).

Sure hope Laserman will finally be cut some slack and get well. You guys should print a book with all his posts, I'd buy it!

EDIT: Remebered I had a short email conversation with him when the OT DVD's were being released, and I was still hoping the PAL DVD's would be superior. As I was reading them again I saw he already predicted they wouldn't be: "If they take the easy way out they will use the NTSC pressing master and just upscale for the PAL version. One would hope not, but it would be much less costly and faster for them to do. We will have to wait and see."
Post
#281176
Topic
Smokey and the Bandit *aspect ratio*
Time
Of course I have a 16:9 TV! It's just that if it turns out the NTSC release won't give me more picture information, I won't bother getting it. Then I could just as easy zoom in on my PAL DVD. But it's also the first time I've heard of this thing, matting off a full-screen film to make it widescreen. Ridiculous if you ask me. Or the director must have intended it to be shown in widescreen in the first place, it was probably shown in theatres that way.
Post
#281169
Topic
Smokey and the Bandit *aspect ratio*
Time
Also one of my all time favorites. I've got the PAL DVD for quite a while now and always disliked the fact that it was a full-screen (1.33:1) release. Now I just discovered there's a NTSC release in widescreen (1.85:1). But on the verge of ordering it I read that in this case the widescreen version is actually missing picture information compared to the full-screen version. The reason would be that the film was shot in open-matte (aspect ratio 1.33:1). So my question is, does anyone here have that widescreen release? If you do could you post some random screenhots, I'd like to get to the bottom of this Thanks.
Post
#242943
Topic
Star Wars Limited Edition Screen Captures.
Time
Originally posted by: vbangle
Of course, just by looking at his eyes you can tell that.... But measure from the forehead wound to his eyebrow...there is a clear difference there.
What I'm looking at is the proportions of his head...it just doesn't look right, to me it looks stretched out...
It may be nothing but I don't recall Vader's head
being that mis-shapened, even with him moving around....


There's nothing wrong, it just hasn't been resized.
Post
#235353
Topic
<em><strong>Grinder's PAL first issues transfer</strong></em> (* unfinished project *)
Time
I use a Sony DCR HC40E for the DV capturing. It can only deal with PAL, so nothing needs to be (or can be) calibrated on that. The screens I posted in the X0 thread were from quick caps I did with the DVD-recorder, I assume it adjusts itself to PAL and NTSC depending on what you're recording. I should have scaled up that NTSC shot instead of the other way around, but I don't see how the black level can be off. Those '95 PAL releases are just damn dark. Here are a couple of screens from ANH (it's OK to drool):

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s1.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s2.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s3.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s4.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s5.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s6.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s7.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s8.jpg

http://www.student.ru.nl/tomdriessen/s9.jpg
Post
#235312
Topic
<em><strong>Grinder's PAL first issues transfer</strong></em> (* unfinished project *)
Time

I finally got around to transfering this unique LD set. I’ve never seen a transfer of it, and it certainly deserves it to be preserved. The ANH LD is from '82, TESB from '85 and ROTJ from '86. The image is so clear, sharp, and has such an authentic look to it, it’s my favorite SW LD set. It looks very “unprocessed”, probably because it is just that. And on top of that they rival the official (widescreen) DVD release in detail. Certainly the detail in near-dark sequences. The only drawback: it’s P&S. Except for the entire crawl-shots of ANH and ROTJ, which are enhanced anamorphic widescreen. I say enhanced, because there are no black bars present, so you’d actually have to scale it down to fit it in the normal aspect ratio if you were making a widescreen SW DVD.

ANH has got some noticeable laserrot though. So when I got that disc, and was stunned by its appearance, I started looking for two additional discs so I could use TooT. I would have done that, but on one of the discs the rot is so bad that a particular 5 minute sequence can’t actually be read anymore by both of my players! The only way I could get around that would be to accept the rot in that sequence, and let TooT filter out all the other rot. I may still do that, but not for now, with the september release coming up and the faded interest in preservation efforts. Though I expect these transfers to even have advantage over the official OT releases. But let’s cut all the speculations on that, and hope to be pleasantly surprised on that 11th of september. TESB and ROTJ are rot free by the way.

I am doing a complete preservation, capturing all the footage on the LD, including copyright warnings and such. ROTJ even has a trailer for another movie before the feature starts! I was thinking about leaving the side breaks too, because of the “side 2” screen, but I decided to leave that out. Apart from that I’m doing nothing more than encoding to MPEG-2 and AC3 to fot on a DVD5. I will be using the Pioneer DVL-909 again: still haven’t got that 2950 looked at. It gives a slightly sharper and cleaner image, except for the extensive amount of chroma noise. Does anyone know what causes that by the way? Anyway, the 909 is one of the best PAL machines too, so you’re talking about 1% differences here.

ANH will be up on a.b.starwars by the end of the week, it will include English and Dutch subtitles, as with my previous transfers.

Post
#233314
Topic
~~~Segaflip's Newsgroup Posting List~~~
Time
Originally posted by: lordjedi
I use binsearch right now to create an nzb file. The only problem with this is that you can't browse the group. You have to know what you're looking for in order to find anything.


Oh no, don't say you download headers, or they'll take you for an amateur You CAN browse newsgroups with binsearch.info and yabse.com, works a lot better. I've heard Grabit is a fine program, I'm a very happy Newsleecher user myself (version 1.0).
Post
#231229
Topic
.: The XØ Project - Laserdisc on Steroids :. (SEE FIRST POST FOR UPDATES) (* unfinished project *)
Time
Originally posted by: Karyudo
Those are not straight captures, Grinder. They can't be, since they're the same size. So how (and why) did you resize them?

Also, did you correct for the setup (+7 IRE, as I recall) on NTSC discs?


I only resized the PAL image to NTSC resolution, for comparison's sake. But what I meant was that they don't have any filters applied, or corrections done. I didn't correct anything, just hooked the player up and made screens in virtualdub, should I have?