logo Sign In

Gaffer Tape

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jun-2005
Last activity
13-Nov-2019
Posts
7,996

Post History

Post
#417656
Topic
The next Nolan-led Batman film - my thoughts.
Time

Warbler said:

I felt was ok to have two-face in the movie, and his creation was handled  very well.    But why did they have to kill him off?   They should have left the two-arc at the point where Dent was in the hospital bed mentally turning into Two-Face.   Two-Face could have been the main villain in  the 3rd movie.   Other than that, I think the Dark Knight was great.  I think there should only be 1 villain per movie.

Like I said, I'm rather glad they killed him off.  I think his descent into villainy was far more interesting than a Two-Face crime spree would have been.  So it just would have been a let down.  Besides the fact that his objectives had mostly been accomplished at this point.  He was mourning Rachel (oh, and the fact that Harvey actually validated the existence of the character of Rachel Dawes also earned so many points in my book as well) and getting his revenge by giving those responsible a 50/50 chance as well.  What else was there for him to do?  I think if he had taken the next movie solo, he would have overstayed his welcome, so I just love the way they did it in The Dark Knight.

Post
#417625
Topic
The next Nolan-led Batman film - my thoughts.
Time

Really?  I felt the opposite, C3PX.  I loved how they handled Two-Face, and I think it's my favorite portrayal of the character ever.  With Joker they had a premade villain who got to do his villain thing the entire movie.  But by making Harvey the secondary villain, they really had a chance to spend the whole movie showing how he got there.  If he had been the only villain, they wouldn't have been able to get away with such a deep story for him.  I wasn't even disappointed that the payoff was so short.  It fit his character and what they'd been building up for that it was still satisfying to me.  It's like I always said:  I was expected to be impressed with The Joker, but it was Harvey who surprisingly stole the show for me.

Post
#417568
Topic
Actors/Characters Who Destroyed OR Helped a Franchise
Time

Hmm, as far as Lando goes, does he even consistently "add" to the series?  That's not to say I don't love Lando.  He certainly added a unique quality to ESB:  an ally you're not sure you can trust who does do what he thinks is right for the people he is responsible for but doesn't necessarily overlap with what's right for the heroes.  But does he really "add" anything to ROTJ?  Again, I love Lando's section of the film, but, like a lot of the other returning characters, he's basically given a good-guy thing to do and does it, so I can't say he really added anything in that one, any more than I can say Han really added anything to ROTJ.

Post
#417340
Topic
RIP Gary Coleman
Time

Why is that?  I'm actually afraid of hitting a little too close to home in light of your description of your own life, so I don't want to seem callous or (God forbid) encouraging.  But you used the phrase "no life."  As in, lack of quality of life.  While maybe the circumstances you listed aren't the end of your world, who's to say if they're the end of someone else's world?  Doesn't a complete lack of quality of life seem like a legitimate reason to not want to be alive?  Again, not that I'm saying anything derogatory towards you.  Hell, you might just be made of sterner stuff than others.  But that said, I don't necessarily believe the threshhold of pain is linear.  Some things simply matter more to some people than to others, while the opposite is also true.

But I do object to the cowardly thing.  While I don't necessarily think it just for someone who is responsible for others dependent on them (young children, for example), I stand by my answer that killing oneself is not an easy thing to do.  To anyone who considers suicide an easy or cowardly act, put a gun up to your head and tell me how easy it is to pull the trigger.

Post
#417326
Topic
RIP Gary Coleman
Time

It's okay, bkev.  I don't think Warb's twisting my words here.  But I don't know what to tell you.  Like our debate in the Politics thread, it's something that I can understand both sides to the issue, so it's hard for me to argue my point with you.  And also like the other issue, it's something I have a strong, personal connection to and feelings about.  But it's complicated.  On the one hand, you could look at it like putting down a pet.  They're suffering.  They don't want to suffer anymore.  It's selfish of the family to force the animal to continue suffering.  On the other hand, the future is a ball of uncertainty, and who's to say if things won't get better?  It also causes quite a bit of pain and grief for the family and friends left behind, and one might argue that's selfish.  But on the other other hand, aren't people always told (in terms of careers), "You have to follow your own path, not the one that your family wants you to take, because you're the one who's going to have to live with it"?  So, yeah, it's complicated.

Post
#417309
Topic
RIP Gary Coleman
Time

What?  Simply believing this a crapsack world with no redeeming qualities and that life isn't necessarily as precious as other people believe isn't enough of a reason?  Yeah, I do see where you're coming from, but I don't think you have to be cowardly or crazy to simply not want to live.  If he believes he'll find greater peace in heaven or simply by not existing at all, then I think that's a great choice for him to make.

Heh, didn't I make a "right to die" thread about six months ago?

Post
#417295
Topic
RIP Gary Coleman
Time

Yes, Warbs.  It is terrible to his family and friend regardless.  But if someone is suffering that much and really wants to die, I think it's terrible to throw that kind of guilt in his face and force him to remain to be miserable.  I honestly have quite a bit of respect for people who commit suicide.  No matter what anyone tells you about it being the coward's way out, it is NOT an easy thing to do.

Post
#417217
Topic
A Woman for Luke?
Time

TheBoost said:

True, but couldt Wedge, or Niemb Niumb or someone die of old age. Or at least be decrepit? Or let Han use a cane?

 Chewie and Mon Mothma are the only dead people in 50 years.

Don't forget Anakin "I have to be a martyr so the stupid, stupid fans won't get confused when that other Anakin starts showing up in movies and books" Solo.

Already an EU character, I know, but he was one of the core characters, and since Mara was already mentioned...

Post
#417174
Topic
RIP Gary Coleman
Time

I can't believe no one's beaten me to the punch.  On facebook today, I saw one of my friends had switched his avatar to a picture of the animated angel Gary Coleman from The Gary Coleman Show.  At first I just thought he, like I, had enjoyed this rare cartoon from the '80s.  It was to my horror I learned later that day that he had passed from a cerebral hemorrhage.

We will miss you indeed.  I won't quote your catch phrase because I know you wouldn't appreciate it.  I'll just say thanks for all the memories, and I'll miss ya, buddy.