logo Sign In

Gaffer Tape

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jun-2005
Last activity
13-Nov-2019
Posts
7,996

Post History

Post
#451658
Topic
Gaffer Tape's YouTube Reviews of Awesome Candy-Creating Goodness! (The Facts of Life/Star Trek III Conspiracy!)
Time

Superman The Movie The Ending Review!

My next challenge for Who Reviews the Reviewers.  Oh, yeah, I guess I should have mentioned that I wasn't voted off last week.  This week's challenge was to review something I didn't like.  So I did.

Oh, and at Frink's great advice, I reduced the run time from three hours to seven minutes.  I hope I didn't leave out anything important.

Post
#451255
Topic
Dialoging
Time

No-name pilot?  Ric Olie's going to have words for you soon.  ^_~

But, yeah, aside from the almighty establishing shot, that kind of dialogue is part of what makes the prequels so... "special."  But I will say in the defense of that particular moment is that at least he was talking to a child, somewhat justifying such a blatant piece of exposition.  George saw the easy way out and just RAN with it!

Post
#450553
Topic
The Dark Knight Rises: No Riddler, No 3D
Time

This topic does come up every so often, and, as a huge fan of Batman Returns, I also don't mind its take on The Penguin.  And watching all the documentaries and such, it's awesome just how connected Danny DeVito was to his character.  It's true, looking back, that you can kinda see how Batman Returns marked Burton's... completion, I guess, of the evolution into his unyielding style, which I admit has fatigued me quite a bit over the years.  So I can certainly understand derision towards Return for it being that.  As was also said in the supplements, "It's a Tim Burton movie."  I can also certainly see people agreeing with it being a Tim Burton movie at the cost of not being a Batman movie.  I don't think it crosses that line, but it does come pretty close at times.

All that said, I would certainly like to see The Penguin done "right."

Post
#450481
Topic
The Dark Knight Rises: No Riddler, No 3D
Time

That's a good point, though, especially about The Riddler and Catwoman.  I wonder why no Riddler?  Has that always just been idle speculation?  And it's just such a shame that Catwoman has been so marred due to her own terrible movie.  But, still, it might give Nolan a chance to redeem her.  After all, with Rachel blown to smithereens, it would make some sense to give an emotionally-scarred Bruce a femme-fetale on the rebound.

Post
#450253
Topic
A new Star Wars Trilogy on the way?
Time

Alexrd said:

Gaffer Tape said:

Alexrd said:

generalfrevious said:

Stop milking the cash cow, Lucas. It's been bleeding for the past five years...

Has it? People keep drinking their milk. I never understood that problem. Let a new generation have Star Wars too.

Why does there have to be new Star Wars for a new generation to have it?  There's already plenty of Star Wars for this, the next, and every subsequent generation to be satisfied.

And who decides there's plenty? The movies are there for everybody, yes. But what's so wrong to give people (old or new) more Star Wars? I'm not talking about more movies, but everything else. If people buy it, it's because they like it. I still don't understand the "stop milking the cash cow" argument...

Because there are fans who actually realize that stories need to come to an end at some point.  That if you just keep going for the sake of having new stuff, it's utterly useless.  There is one mindset of fans that they just want to always have that feeling of having new stuff come out because it feels nice when new stuff comes out.  Then there's that mindset of fans that just want an awesome story told in an awesome fictional universe and then have that awesome fictional universe laid to rest because, let's face it, that's part of what makes it special.  If you're constantly inundated with it, first it becomes routine, then it just becomes annoying.

Today is BTTF on Blu-ray day.  I have a feeling you're not going to find a lot of disgruntled fans out there begging for another sequel under the logic, "Let a new generation have their Back to the Future too."  The existing trilogy already tells a story that continues to delight people.  No need to drag it out or spin it off or milk it dry.