logo Sign In

Gaffer Tape

User Group
Members
Join date
2-Jun-2005
Last activity
13-Nov-2019
Posts
7,996

Post History

Post
#228109
Topic
Editing movies ruled illegal
Time
I think that Power Rangers thing is just dumb, for two reasons. One, the word "Morphin" is spelled out in the frickin' title of the show! It's obviously not morphine. "But what if the kid is too young to read?" you might ask. Find me a kid who hasn't gained the skills to read yet knows what morphine is, and I will buy him a car!

EDIT: Third reason. What's so bad about morphine anyway? It's a legitimate drug. I don't see how knowing of its existence is supposed to be damaging to kids.

Censoring is stupid.
Post
#228107
Topic
HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE
Time
Same here! Yeah, I did it lose it at that point, but I lost it earlier too. The first thing that did it for me was when Cedric's spirit spell-recall thingy appeared to Harry and said, "Bring my body back to my dad." Even though I had to smile a bit at their slight line-changing (as opposed to "Bring my body back to my parents," since they omitted Cedric's mother from the movie), it still drove me to the breaking point!
Post
#228105
Topic
What did the Prequel Trilogy need?
Time
Awesome list, and I especially agree with the in-jokes to the OT. Lucas probably thought he was doing a good thing by tying elements together. He just didn't know what he was doing. He left so many gaping holes of continuity, yet he put in a whole bunch of crap that didn't need to be there, like all the things you mentioned. He just put them there for no reason, and that, in turn, gave him the need to change things in the OT to make up for them (i.e. The Fett Bunch). Plus, the entire reasoning is off. I mean, it's so obvious that the only reason they're there is so OT fans can go, "Hey, this is just like when..." But according to Lucas, you're supposed to watch them in numerical order. I think that's a stupid idea to begin with, and, if you do choose Lucas's way, then the "in-jokes" have no meaning behind them because there's no precedence for them. You can't have it both ways. You can't make references to your earlier movies, and convince your fans to watch the earlier movies last. It just doesn't make any sense.
Post
#228095
Topic
HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE
Time
Personally, I don't see anything wrong with Columbus's adaptations. I'm not entirely sure, though, if he would have done as well with the later books, when they got longer and more mature. His book accuracy plan worked well for the two short books, but obviously that would have been impossible with the longer ones, and I wonder if he could have pulled off capturing the spirit while extremely condensing the plot. Prisoner of Azkaban did great with capturing the essence but screwed up a lot of important plot points. Goblet of Fire did great on both, with only a few missteps (Priori Incantatem). Like I've said before, I rarely cry at movies, but Cedric's death had me bawling the first two times I saw it. For that alone, I'd give it two thumbs up, but nearly everything else about it was perfect too.

The only thing I worry about now is how the movies deal with existing supporting characters, primarily the teachers. For the past two movies, you only see classroom scenes with the new teachers. And Kloves always seems to have trouble figuring out new ways to work McGonagall, Snape, Flitwick, etc. into the movie while keeping the plot going. I admit that it'd be hard. We've already seen with GOF that certain characters have had to be sacrificed in order to keep the plot going for the timespan of a movie.
Post
#228093
Topic
Simple Storytelling
Time
"Once upon a time, a beautiful princess got married, had kids, and died, causing her kids to be great rulers. The end," was how the story had gone. Obviously, Jenkins had been one of the offspring. Only he got bored one day and dashed off to Pluto to do some adventuring. The Plutonian atmosphere had allowed him to live for generations but turned him into an albino. There he met a beautiful woman and married her. Obviously, they couldn't have monkey children of their own, so they adopted a monkey, who would be Mojo's father. But they intravenously injected Jenkins's royalty into him through Plutonian science. Then he met Silvestre, who also had a pet monkey. But this monkey was also quarter elf and quarter Petebest the Dragon. Soon the monkeys married and mated. And all those factors meant...
Post
#228055
Topic
Star Wars prequel Box set
Time
Originally posted by: ADigitalMan
^ ^
And there's the rub: Nobody really gives much of a damn about the prequels to complain about the lack of an O-PT. Hell, many of us who support the preservation of the O-OT have gone all out re-editing the PT to our own satisfaction. (Granted, I've done that to the SE as well, but that's only academic. The O-OT is my first love and desperately needs a proper release.)


Even though I'm not a huge fan of the prequels, I do give a damn, because I'm not just here because I think the Star Wars trilogy's theatrical editions should be preserved, but that of all movies.
Post
#227819
Topic
SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
Time
Originally posted by: greencapt
Originally posted by: TheSessler
They didn't change his look, I thought it was just a part of the symbiote storyline?


Eventually it was, but at the time it was a marketing ploy to increase sales of Spidey. At first it was *only* a costume, albeit a strange one that was made from alien technology... but the writers gave themselves an 'out' by making it slightly different from the other costumes that the alien tech made (read 'Secret Wars'). Fan backlash was strong, mainly against the costume, so Marvel used the 'out' to make the suit try to take over Spider-man (and eventually become Venom). But enough fans enjoyed the costume that Marvel couldn't totally commit one way or another so for a time (circa 'Web of Spider-man #1) that Sipdey actually made a regular cloth costume that looked exactly like the black alien costume.

Confused?

You won't be after this week's episode of... Soap.

Oh wait... wrong series.


I just had to give you props for the Soap reference. Sometimes I feel too old for my age...
Post
#227810
Topic
End of SE ROTJ...
Time
Well, I would never say that it destroyed the whole movie, but Lucas's reasoning behind it does compromise the whole redemption aspect. Besides, that line of reasoning is the best possible motive behind it. But I have my suspicions that:

a. It was simply done as a futile and half-hearted attempt to connect the two trilogies together
b. It was done to make fans feel completely obligated to watch the movies in their improper order of I-VI. In other words, a laughing, "Screw you!" to the fans.
Post
#227804
Topic
Star Wars prequel Box set
Time
Originally posted by: Mike O
Originally posted by: Paulus
Have I spent some years in a coma or something?????
Didn't Episode I just get released not ten years ago????

Could old george really be serious about tinkering with episodes I, II, and III????? If he does, I think that we can't put this down to Buddhism but to insanity. He just doesn't know when to quit.....


It is almost a fact at this point that he is going to alter the PT. Not that I mind much, and in any case the original version of those have been circulating in high quality (the edge enhancement on Episode I controversy aside) on DVD for a while now. But that doesn't seem to bother him as much as the OOT. I wish that I could understand this man, I really do.


Actually, that's not at all true. None of the prequels' theatrical versions exist on DVD, and they never have. He couldn't even wait for those to get on DVD before he started tinkering with them. TPM has the most significant (and worst) edits, while ROTS just has one scene transition changed (allegedly), but the fact remains that the theatrical versions of all three prequels have already been supressed much further than even the OOT.
Post
#227560
Topic
Simple Storytelling
Time
With Mojo's sudden success whisking him off his feet, many years passed before Mojo even thought about his destiny, the necklace, or the card again. But, of course, that was all part of Reallife's altruistically-imparied plan. It was a really quite complicated plan, actually.

EDIT: Added subordinate phrase in first sentence for clarification.
Post
#227547
Topic
SUPERMAN RETURNS REVIEW
Time
Originally posted by: Han Solo VS Indiana Jones
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
But as far as I know, all the modern Batman films have had large and successful toylines. I still have dozens of figures from Tim Burton's Batman and Batman Returns. Apparently, however, they couldn't get the rights to use DeVito's face or maybe they thought it would be too scary, but the figure of The Penguin was the comic-book version.

That's probably part of why filmmakers and toymakers love Batman so much - Batman's vast array of gadgets makes it easy to mass merchandise him. Superman, Aquaman, Wonder Woman, Flash, Captain Marvel, Green Lantern, Martian Manhunter lack those accessories and I wonder if that works against them.


I don't know. Most of the "gadgets" they use in Batman toylines are made up exclusively for the toyline and resemble absolutely nothing ever used in any type of Batman story. As a kid, I'd generally go for the Batman figure that most resembled the one in the movie/cartoon/comic and then expand my collection from there. But, anyway, my point is that they could just as easily make up gadgets or costume variations for other superheroes, and make figures that utilize one of the superpowers. I know they've done this before. I have three Spider-Man action figures from back in the day. One of them has his arms spread out with string emerging from them that he can slide up and down. The second has him in a darker costume that has a button that allows his arms to move in a wall-crawling motion. And the third has detatchable night-vision goggles and Dr. Octopus limbs.

So, yeah, toy developers have a long history of butchering aspects of superheroes.